Mark Pack

High Court rules against Government over Al Yamamah

By | Thu 10th April 2008 - 10:13 am

Breaking news: the High Court has just ruledthat the Serious Fraud Office acted unlawfully in dropping the probe into corruption allegations around the Al Yamamah arms deal. The Court has criticised the SFO for failing to stand up to Government pressure and has said that the SFO broke the law as a result.

As the Government pressure came direct from the then Prime Minister and Attorney General (Blair and Goldsmith), this ruling is a major rebuff to Labour.

It leaves a big question for Gordon Brown: is he going to respect the courts and now give full Government backing to the anti-corruption investigation, or will Labour continue to try to undermine and block it?

The ruling will also reinforce the calls for a public inquiry into the handling of the affair by the SFO and by Labour; you can sign the petition here.

UPDATE: Vince Cable has told the BBC that the ruling is “a devastating indictment of the government”, which had “crossed the line between law and politics”.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Mark Wright 10th Apr '08 - 1:25pm

    This is a great subject for LDs to attack on because it’s another where Lab/Con are in sordid agreement.

  • Diversity 10th Apr '08 - 7:51pm

    The High Court have made a powerful assertion of the independence and integrity of the British legal system. This assertion is made against the Government, and by implication against those who have gone along with the Govenment line. It is our duty as LibDems, as well as to our political advatage, to hammer home our support for the High Court.
    Second, the High Court have noted tha the Government have effectivly not disputed the facts alleged. We must therefore assume that the allegations of the complainants are true; and hammer the Government and its Tory predecessor on the Al Yamamah deal.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • George Thomas
    "Of course, devolution cannot simply mean moving responsibilities without resources. Local leaders need meaningful fiscal powers, long-term funding settlements ...
  • George Thomas
    Greater devolution without greater funding is a poisoned chalice and that is what's being offered in Wales. That and sly digs at the Senedd. Then it leads t...
  • William Wallace
    I think I became a Liberal from listening to sermons of the social gospel when I was a choirboy. But the social gospel of the New Testament is a very long way ...
  • Nick Baird
    I would add to David Evans' valid concerns above. We are facing reverse-devolution via the abolition of our local (firmly Lib Dem controlled) Borough Council. W...
  • Mick Taylor
    @Jana. I am a lifelong Liberal Democrat and a Quaker. I am a believer in the Quaker Peace testimony and this means that I differ from the party on ways to achie...