Obama appoints two climate change experts to top scientific posts

Barack Obama has announced that physicist John Holdren and marine biologist Jane Lubchenco will take up two of the top scientific posts under his administration.

John Holdren will be Executive Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the president’s science adviser. Jane Lubchenco will be in charge at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which runs much of the government’s research into global warming.

This pair of appointments points to a major change in science policy from that under George W Bush, whose senior figures frequently dismissed advice from scientists, preferring to paint global warming as an imaginary leftie-plot.

UPDATE: There’s extensive coverage of this news today (Sunday) in front page stories in The Observer and Independent on Sunday, including the key earlier Energy Secretary appointment.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA.
Advert

15 Comments

  • Obama is already proving the naysayers wrong. It is not possible to say, as it might have been 6 months ago, that he is pretty words & nothing else. He has made respectable policy announcements & surrounded himself with some top people… a few regrettable types who had to be included for political reasons, notwithstanding.

    Yes, I am confident that the cynics will be dumbfounded by Obama’s performance. I was expecting competent 1990s-style centrism but I think I will be setting my standards higher now.

    Those, like me, who admire what Amerrica stands for & represents will be gladdened by the president-elect (& ashamed of our own & the EU’s failure to live up to it). Also, I can’t help being delighted that we’re getting our own back on the right-wing droolers who sneered 🙂

  • The climate is changing – always has and always will. Someone came up with the idea that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is causing warming. The media and masses loved the concept. The politicians loved it, because it was a basis for election. The scientists loved it because they could get lots of money for research grants. However, a few thousand scientists decided to test the hypotheses, and found it sadly lacking in any real evidence. In fact, the more evidence that was measured, the more it disproved the hypothesis. The cause was a combination of many other factors, yet to be defined. They yelled at the top of their voices to warn everyone. However, scientific speedhumps were not allowed to get in the way this runaway vehicle thundering along the path of economic ruin. Somewhere along the way, Obama jumped aboard. There is a fight to be fought, and it doesn’t matter if we have the wrong enemy, or indeed, any enemy at all. I just hope the vehicle runs out of fuel before toppling over a cliff of certain destruction.

  • On the other hand, he’s just chosen Rick Warren to give the opening prayer at his inauguration. Nice.

  • Isn’t it odd?

    David Icke regards Cheney, the US oil industry and the people behind them as the greatest fount of evil in today’s world.

    Yet he claims that global warming is an Illuminati scam aimed at giving government more control over our lives.

    Strange then, that the Illuminati seem to agree with Icke.

    Am I missing something?

  • Andy Hinton,

    You’re just another person who says “I won’t bother backing it up”, because you can’t. I repeat, can anyone produce any evidence that increased CO2 has caused significent global warming? Remember CO2 has increased 5% in the past 10 years, yet there’s been no warming. The CO2 signature 10km above the tropics as predicted by the models can’t be found. There’s no evidence to suggest positive feedback is stronger than negative feedback from any greenhouse effect from CO2 (remember the IPCC models depend on positive feedback). Do I need to back these up, or are you at least up to date with all this?

    I’m happy to preserve our resources, and reduce harmful pollution (which doesn’t include CO2 – an essential gas for plant life), but for the right reasons – global warming isn’t one of them.

  • Whereas Bishop Hill knows it all, & one day the world will regret having not listened to “sceptics” like him.

  • So will Clegg appoint Ben Goldacre of http://www.badscience.net/ as a scientific adviser?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    I would add caring to bold and relevant. Getting a sympathetic ear at the end of a telephone help line is as important as an extra pound in your pay slip. Under...
  • Peter Hirst
    One of the more important issues that the electorate care about is how much political parties understand what matters to them. This varies from person to person...
  • Peter Hirst
    Inequality must be seen in the round. I appreciate living in the north-west because it gives me easy access to mountains such as in Snowdonia, The Lakes and Der...
  • Peter Hirst
    One of the aims of most societies is some sort of redistribution. So fiscal federalism must have a mechanism for the rich regions giving to the poorer. Without ...
  • Peter Martin
    The price mechanism is essentially a system of rationing. In wartime it is usually recognised that it isn't the most equitable system! So some better system h...