As I touched on in a previous post, there is much to debate in the Government’s Communities in Control White Paper published over the summer, even if Hazel Blears’ recent speech on the topic seemed to rather miss the opportunity.
Here’s another morsel:
We will give local authorities the power to provide incentives for voting in local government elections, for example by entering voters into a prize draw. Voting incentives should not be construed as ‘paying for votes’ or create a major new financial burden on councils. Instead, they should be viewed as an eye-catching method to increase awareness and engagement, especially with young people who have never voted and who might view the process with suspicion. [p.70]
What do you think of the idea?
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Can Burnham win the endorsement of Number Ten's most important occupant?
In the Britain of 1940 cars were deadlier than German bombs
"Winston and David" on stage
Slamdac
Rif Winfield
Callum Robertson
Peter Hirst
11 Comments
I don’t agree with that idea. It will mean people voting in order to get a lottery ticket, rather than because they believe in something.
People who do not know who to support, or who against all of them should not vote.
The problem that needs tackling is not to get people to vote any which way, but to get them to vote because they positively support someone who is standing.
I think that anything that gets people into the habit of voting is a good thing. I have my doubts that a lottery of this type will make much of an impact however.
Encouraging people to vote in this way is just tinkering around the edges of our democratic system.
People aren’t voting not because they are not “engaging” in an otherwise-worthwhile process but because the process itself is seriously flawed.
I find this idea truly appalling, completely abhorrent.
That people should need a financial incentive to exerting their voting privilege – awful.
That rather than offer people a political reason for voting our country could resort to something so vulgar – terrible.
That the fate on an election could be decided by people who only bothered to turn out because they might win a year’s free council tax – genuinely horrifying.
I doubt it would have much impact either way.
Though it would be perverse to give a prize of “free council tax” to get people to vote for a body that in effect has little power to alter the rate of council tax.
That’s quite frankly ridiculous. Like paying pupils to go to school, I think it’s government coercion/nanny state at its worst. It would smack of sheer desperation and people would be switched even further.
sorry – no edit button – switched ‘off’ even further…
This isn’t just vulgar, but it shows Labour is willing to resort to bribery where it can’t make a coherent argument.
Pathetic.
Personally, I’m not entirely opposed to weighting votes, perhaps using some basic multiple-choice questionnaire about the candidates, their parties and politics, to favour those who actually understand the issues they’re voting on.
Such a system would be less affected by the problem of people voting for a reward, particularly if their chance of receiving said reward were similarly weighted.
nah