Should you get a lottery ticket for voting?

As I touched on in a previous post, there is much to debate in the Government’s Communities in Control White Paper published over the summer, even if Hazel Blears’ recent speech on the topic seemed to rather miss the opportunity.

Here’s another morsel:

We will give local authorities the power to provide incentives for voting in local government elections, for example by entering voters into a prize draw. Voting incentives should not be construed as ‘paying for votes’ or create a major new financial burden on councils. Instead, they should be viewed as an eye-catching method to increase awareness and engagement, especially with young people who have never voted and who might view the process with suspicion. [p.70]

What do you think of the idea?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

11 Comments

  • Andrew Tennant 9th Nov '08 - 2:19pm

    I find this idea truly appalling, completely abhorrent.

    That people should need a financial incentive to exerting their voting privilege – awful.

    That rather than offer people a political reason for voting our country could resort to something so vulgar – terrible.

    That the fate on an election could be decided by people who only bothered to turn out because they might win a year’s free council tax – genuinely horrifying.

  • Hywel Morgan 9th Nov '08 - 2:27pm

    I doubt it would have much impact either way.

    Though it would be perverse to give a prize of “free council tax” to get people to vote for a body that in effect has little power to alter the rate of council tax.

  • This isn’t just vulgar, but it shows Labour is willing to resort to bribery where it can’t make a coherent argument.

  • Pathetic.

  • Personally, I’m not entirely opposed to weighting votes, perhaps using some basic multiple-choice questionnaire about the candidates, their parties and politics, to favour those who actually understand the issues they’re voting on.

    Such a system would be less affected by the problem of people voting for a reward, particularly if their chance of receiving said reward were similarly weighted.

  • nah

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 23rd Apr - 10:47am
    It's inevitable. They were essentially a sort of lobby and Brexit means they are redundant. Most of their votes will swing back to the Tories,...
  • User AvatarAlistair 23rd Apr - 10:47am
    The headline doesnt match the article
  • User Avatarmalc 23rd Apr - 10:34am
    There are two Scottish polls in Sunday’s newspapers – Panelbase for the Sunday Times and Survation for the Sunday Post. Voting intention figures, with changes...
  • User AvatarAlisdair McGregor 23rd Apr - 10:34am
    I assume this means "Tory MPs in pro-Remain seats", rather than actually pro-EU Tory MPs?
  • User AvatarWilliam 23rd Apr - 10:33am
    Not sure any Tory candidate counts as pro-EU, given the manifesto they will be standing on.
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 23rd Apr - 10:16am
    All very impressive. Very different (thank goodness) to the Dad's Army level of "support" non-target candidates used to get ten years ago or more.