Ming: a woman will stand for leader when I go

An interesting comment from Ming Campbell, as reported in The Guardian:

“When the moment comes, it won’t just be Huhne and Clegg, there will be others, including at least one woman. There’s some very bright cookies around.”

Any similarity between that statement and this article in The Scotsman is surely coincidental:

‘Revealed: Lib Dem version of Margaret Thatcher, 29′.

Share:
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1363 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

18 Comments

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 9:27 am | Permalink

    Perhaps he means Elspeth?”

  • MatGB
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Julia to be ‘leader after next’, but don’t tell the activists, it’d upset them.

    Hmm, I’m looking for an objection to the idea m’self. Nope, not seeing one.

    But not as a replacement for Ming, a first time MP fine, but a first time MP younger than me? Actually, that could work.

    I still want Lynne to run.

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Lyne Featherstone?

    :-)

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:10 am | Permalink

    As a Conservative, I would be over the moon if you chose Featherstone!

  • Meral Ece
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    This seems a perfectly obvious statement for Ming to make. We have talented femal MP’s. Seems to be a bit too revolutionary for some though…
    Next there’ll be suggestions that one day we could even see a BME MP even going for Leader!

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    I’d be all in favour of a woman leader, but with one important proviso. She absolutely has to be good looking. At present, I’m not sure I can see where the “talent” lies within the Westminster lady MPs.

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    “We have talented female MPs”

    Yes, but Julia Goldsworthy isn’t one of them.

  • Stuart
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Laurence (at 5), you are naughty, but I did giggle.

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    So the media have spent this conference talking about a leadership contest that exists only in their pikaian brains. But not content with that, some of them are now waxing their carrots about the next fictitious leadership contest after this fictitious leadership contest.

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps there’ll be a BME candidate too? No?

    Someone that didn’t slide in via posh upbringing, millions in bank and Brussels?

    But no to Goldswothy, no to the millionairess, no to that crashing and burning end of her Teather woman.

    Ming must mean Kramer surely? Surely?

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t Maggie only become leader because she challenged a sitting male leader who was perceived as a failure when everyone else thought it better to wait though :-)

  • helsom
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Thatcher wasn’t exactly nurtured by the Conservative Party. She was nominated against Heath by the hard right of the party because none of the obvious candidates had a chance, all of them being barking, and she was a marginal enough figure not to have made enemies within the faction. (They might also have thought that they could control her if she won. Ha ha ha.) And allegedly Airey Neave fixed the election so that she beat Heath.

  • WINKLER
    Posted 20th September 2007 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    The Tories in Cornwall appear to be panicking about the chances of Julia becoming Leader. On Conservative Home leader page they are frantic about the headlines this will create in the Cornish papers, especially just before a possible Election.
    Julia seems to be very popular on her home patch, and her friend,the newcomer Teverson seems to be getting there on the Truro/Falmouth scene.

  • Posted 20th September 2007 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Julia Goldsworthy has been my favourite for the next leader for a while (or leader after next). She’s the closest thing we have to a normal human being on our front benches but she certainly needs some more time and assistance to become real leadership material.

  • dreamingspire
    Posted 21st September 2007 at 9:09 am | Permalink

    Lynne to stand. She has the ability, the commitment, the common touch, and the work rate.

  • Hywel Morgan
    Posted 21st September 2007 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    “the newcomer Teverson”

    Hardly a newcomer – she fought Falmouth and Camborne in 92 and 97.

  • welsh and proud to be a liberal
    Posted 21st September 2007 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    It will be good for the cornish liberal democrats in the run up for an early general election because the Cornish Media, especially the weekly papers will indulge in a feeding frenzy, which is great publicity.
    If and it is an If, Julia stands against two men she has a good chance in being a woman.
    I bet the cornish conservatives are anxious with the publicity.

  • Posted 21st September 2007 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    perhaps we wont have a woman running, perhaps we will. Its certainly a possibility considering how bloody good our few women MPs are in comparison to most of the men. I thought Jo Swinson was very good at conference although I do have a certain admiration for Susan Kramer.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?