Nick Clegg leaders’ debate win: your LDV reader

Here’s a welcome problem to have this morning … wading our way through the sheer volume of media news that’s positive for the Lib Dem following Nick Clegg’s terrific performance in last night’s televised lesaders’ debate.

Let’s make a start with the newspaper editorials:

Nick Clegg’s night (Guardian)

Expectations shape reactions, which is why Britain’s first televised leaders’ debate will be judged not just in terms of how the three men involved in it performed, but what was predicted before they began speaking. On that measure, Nick Clegg thrived, David Cameron disappointed and Gordon Brown survived.

The Other One Wins: Nick Clegg seized his moment (Times)

Nick Clegg took his chance and changed a two-man competition into something that looks more like a three-horse race.

Clegg uses first TV debate to best effect (Telegraph)

And then there’s the commentators:

The winner was Clegg, partly for being there (Steve Richards, Independent)

The winner was Clegg, partly for being there. In front of an audience his predecessors would have died for he was calm and authoritative while managing to pull off the awkward balance of appearing distant from the leaders of the bigger two parties without seeming eccentric and on the margins. Crucially he seemed relevant. By the end he was almost shameless in his proclamations of dismissing the others while promising vaguely “real change”.

‘I agree with Nick’ was the night’s real catchphrase (Jonathan Freedland, Guardian)

[this] was a debate that surpassed expectations. But that was not the greatest surprise of the night, an honour that went to the Liberal Democrat leader. From the start, Clegg asserted himself as the star of the show, anointed as such by a whopping 51% of those surveyed by an instant Sun/YouGov poll.

Nick Clegg was the winner in this historic leaders’ debate (Martin Kettle, Guardian)

Clegg, treated fairly by the system for once and not barracked by backbench bullies from the other parties, had most to gain and duly gained it. “We need to be clear with you and straight with you” may sound like political blah but voters like honesty.

This was a huge evening for the Liberal Democrats. Clegg was helped merely by being there. But he also had to prove he was worthy of his equality with Brown and Cameron. There’s not much doubt that he succeeded. … His final pitch was significant. Yes, he said, there is an alternative. It’s not true that the parties are all the same. There’s another option which Labour and the Tories will never give you.

Look into my eyes (Bagehot, Economist)

Nick Clegg grasped the need to talk through the camera to the audience at home better than the other two. And whereas Vince Cable’s central position in the chancellors’ debate helped to make him look statesmanlike, Mr Clegg’s position at the side of the stage supported his bid to portray himself as an insurgent. He has always been more persuasive and personable than the lack of coverage he generally commands would suggest. It isn’t surprising that voters seem to have warmed to him—though I half-expected his liberal stance on prisons and views on Trident to put people off.

And here’s a few other press cutting that will put a smile on the faces of Lib Dems today …

Armchair election: First thoughts on the debate (Robert Shrimsley, FT)

Nick Clegg dominated proceedings and must be held to have been the clear winner in the actual contest. He always had the easiest task and it is no surprise he came out well but I never expected him to be quite such a commanding figure. He was clear, articulate, forceful without being overly aggressive. He seemed relaxed (possibly too much so – I wondered about the hands in the pocket stance) and always spoke directly to the camera.


Kingmaker Clegg wins the TV war of words – and moves Britain even closer to a hung parliament
(Daily Mail)

The prospect of a hung parliament moved a giant step closer today after Nick Clegg emerged as the big winner in last night’s TV debate. Liberal Democrats were today hailing their leader’s performance as a potential ‘game-changer’ in the General Election campaign as one survey showed 61 per cent of viewers thought he came out on top over Gordon Brown and David Cameron.

Sun dial tells who shone (Sun)

The panel showed an overwhelming triumph for Nick Clegg. He had more soundbites, better context and was successful in differentiating himself from the other two.

Nick Clegg: the new Susan Boyle in the politics show Britain’s Not Got Talent (Gerald Warner, Telegraph)

Clegg, the outsider, wowed the television audience and the votes rolled in. He’ll be cutting an album any day now – if he is not otherwise engaged, cutting things in a coalition government.

David Cameron weakest, says body language expert (Telegraph)
Professor Patrick O’Donnell, Glasgow University:

In terms of warmth, Clegg won by a mile. He was relaxed and made a lot of appeasement gestures to show he was on your side – the kind of person you would like to go for a pint with.

If I was Cameron’s backers I would be worried. He came across all the time as anxious and worried. His whole manner was slightly aloof, always on the back foot. And he has gestures that are weak. He always wears a quizzical frown that looks like he doesn’t know what is going on. He waves his hands like a conductor waves a baton, but not firmly.”


Most Lib Dem bloggers have a view – check them all out over at Ryan Cullen’s Aggregator.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in General Election.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/18928 for Twitter and emails.

7 Comments

  • Anthony Aloysius St 16th Apr '10 - 1:15pm

    To say that I’m amazed not to see any mention here of the latest poll would be a wild understatement.

    ComRes/ITV:
    CON 36%
    LD 35%
    LAB 24%

    Moving into completely uncharted territory in modern electoral history …

  • Anthony Aloysius St 16th Apr '10 - 1:25pm

    But apparently that was “unweighted”. (God knows what their sampling method is, if the weighting makes so much difference!)

    It seems the official figures are:
    CON 35%
    LAB 28%
    LD 24%

    Maybe we should wait for another poll?

  • Anthony Aloysius St 16th Apr '10 - 1:56pm

    Oh. Apparently that first “poll” included only people who watched the debate (up to 10 million).

  • Anthony Aloysius St 16th Apr '10 - 7:36pm

    According to Anthony Wells, those “official” ComRes figures – showing a Lib Dem boost of just 3% – seem to be based on the assumption that those who watched the debate were evenly distributed throughout the population, and that there would be no effect on the voting intentions of anyone who didn’t watch the debate.

    To my mind, both these assumptions are wildly inaccurate, and both tend to minimise the likely increase in Lib Dem support:
    (1) Surely those who took the trouble to watch the debate are (a) more likely to vote and (b) less likely to have decided already how to vote.
    (2) More importantly, the media coverage of the debate and word of mouth will surely have a significant influence on the majority who didn’t actually watch the debate, in just the same way that snippets of party conferences shown on the TV news tend to boost public support for the parties even though very few people actually watch the debates themselves.

    I’d have thought common sense would dictate that the boost in Lib Dem support would be substantially larger than the 3% indicated by the ComRes “extrapolation”. It will be very interesting to see what YouGov and possibly other opinion polls show tonight.

  • I saw the debate later in the net (as I’m writing from abroad), and I think Clegg was magnificent, only I hope he would have pointed out, that the donation from Michael Brown was accepted in good faith (unlike the money received by many MPs during the expense scandal), well before Brown was suspected of any wrongdoing.

    Now it seems the Tories will be going with the line “Vote yellow – get Brown”. I wish the answer will be, “No, get Brown – vote Yellow.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid-1 22nd Aug - 11:46pm
    Because: (1) Crimea was not and is not a country or a nation, but part of the territory of another independent nation, Ukraine, which did...
  • User AvatarSteveL 22nd Aug - 11:12pm
    "On the critical issue of whether human activity is a cause of climate change, Science has been able to establish that recent climate change is...
  • User Avatarstuart moran 22nd Aug - 10:52pm
    and I am bottom......
  • User AvatarJohn Dunn 22nd Aug - 10:02pm
    David-1 writes: "As liberals, we should endorse the right of a nation to freely decide with whom they wish to associate." Absolutely. And interestingly, when...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 22nd Aug - 8:49pm
    Hi Stephen, I certainly wouldn't be looking to kick off over your use of the word radical (I'm trying to reduce my tantrums), I just...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 22nd Aug - 8:44pm
    The point surely is that few Voters expect us to form a Government on our own. What they want to know from us is how...