Official: the snoopers’ charter is dead in this parliament

One element missing from the Queen’s Speech was the Communications Data Bill, aka the ‘snoopers’ charter’. No surprise to Lib Dems: Nick Clegg torpedoed it last month.

So I had a momentary spasm of concern to see on ConservativeHome this story from Mark Wallace: The Snoopers’ Charter comes sneaking back. Again.

I asked Lib Dem MP Julian Huppert (who’s played a crucial role in safeguarding civil liberties this parliament, including on this Bill) if there were any truth in it, and got an immediate reply…

… and another from Lib Dem president Tim Farron:

Here’s Mark Wallace’s reply:

As Mark highlights, the Home Office has a track record of returning to the scene of its civil liberties crimes. Joanthan Calder made this point strongly over at his Liberal England blog a couple of weeks ago: Lib Dem snooper’s charter victory is great, but we must be vigilant: “… the danger has not gone away. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and all that.”

And of course Lib Dems have within our own ranks — in the person of Lord (Alex) Carlile — one of the most avid agitators for new powers to be given to the authorities (aka protecting our freedoms by giving them up). Here he is on the BBC’s Daily Politics again making his familiar case for the erosion of civil liberties in the name of the greater good.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • We all have our areas where we strongly disagree with the party mainstream view, but I have to question why Lord Carlile insists on making a stand on this issue against the party. There is no chance the party position will budge and I’m not sure what he is achieving other than making the party look split. Time for him to focus his energies on other issues in my view, and I hope the leadership will ‘encourage’ him in that direction.

  • Andrew Suffield 9th May '13 - 8:23pm

    Indeed, Charles Farr will not quit just because this government said no. He’ll be making the next government introduce the same damn thing again and we’ll have to fight it off again – all at considerable public expense.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 27th Mar - 1:29pm
    Matt, I am so sorry to hear that you have been going through such a difficult time recently. I do understand that it might not...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 27th Mar - 1:28pm
    @ Zachary "David Lloyd George during his People’s Budget showed that the Guns vs Butter game is winnable, if you shrewdly move the goalposts. He...
  • User Avatarmatt 27th Mar - 1:02pm
    @Catherine Jane Crosland I wish I was in the right place / space to write an article for LDV. Unfortunately I had a major episode...
  • User Avatarjean Evans, 27th Mar - 12:59pm
    This was the best speech I've heard Tim give and they are all very good. Interesting to compare him with Nick Clegg. Both are excellent...
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Payne 27th Mar - 12:51pm
    Well there is 2 things to consider here. Is "a strong defence" a vote winner and is it in the national interest? It was hardly...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 27th Mar - 12:11pm
    Matt, It is a pity people have not been commenting more about this subject, but I'm absolutely sure there is nothing personal in this. Actually...