Online buzz and the London Mayor election: final figures showing Paddick getting the most positive coverage

The latest figures from http://www.opinion-tracker.co.uk/ about the online coverage being garnered by the London Mayor candidates show Brian Paddick as the only one out of himself, Livingstone, Johnson and Berry to overall be getting more positive then negative coverage. Full details on their site.

Share:
This entry was posted in London, Online politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/2626 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

3 Comments

  • Stuart
    Posted 1st May 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Just read the Indy’s editorial today. It names who would get its 1st and 2nd preference in the mayoral contest (http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-if-newspapers-had-a-vote-this-one-would-put-its-cross-beside-818670.html).

    Good. I am pleased. Now I don’t have to bother buying it any more in the mistaken belief that at least it backed the LibDems.

  • boldkevin
    Posted 1st May 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Yes, but neither did it back Ken or Boris for 1st preference vote.

  • asquith
    Posted 1st May 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Johann Hari let himself down by not mentioning Paddick in his article on Tuesday. Though he did strike some solid blows against Boris. But apparently all the idiots will support him because he’s a celeb. They might have four long years in which to regret that.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?