Party Presidency, rumour-mill update

It’s less than a week since Baroness (Ros) Scott announced she would not be standing for a second term as President of the Lib Dems, the only post directly elected by all party members other than that of Leader.

But with nominations closing in less than a fortnight — and 200 nominations to be secured from conference representatives of at least 20 local parties — those looking to contest the position are going to be scrambling to get their supporter networks up and running.

I’ve heard from one in-the-know source that Jason Zadrozny, a district and county councillor in Nottinghamshire who contested Geoff Hoon’s old seat of Ashfield at the general election and came within 192 votes of winning on a huge 17% swing, is definitely standing. He will formally announce today, I hear.

Also seriously contemplating running is Lib Dem blogger Jennie Rigg, who sets out her reasons for wanting to stand, and her pledges if elected, here. A pledgebank to ensure Jennie can afford to run has already been started by those wanting her to throw her hat in the ring.

A further candidacy is expected to be formally announced today… more news as we get it.

Update: former London Mayoral candidate and former Richmond Park MP Susan Kramer’s candidacy also appears to be up-and-running.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Party Presidency.
Advert

17 Comments

  • I note some councils are sharing executives in an attempt to save money. Maybe the libdems should follow this approach and set an example.

    Baroness Warsi would be suitable. Lets face it you’re little more than a subsidiary these days anyway.

  • Iain Roberts 16th Sep '10 - 9:51am

    The trolls are up early today, I see.

  • Grammar Police 16th Sep '10 - 9:53am

    It’s the sleeping under bridges – you get up when it’s light.

  • In fact, I thought Simon was great – seemed to be good for his constituency and the party in my view. Though I accept that the role has changed, and in coalition you are probably right Niklas.

  • I can condition Susan Kramer is running, she’s helping out at today’s Earls court council by-election, and getting nominations (I’m not a voting rep so couldn’t sign myself).

  • *confirm not condition

  • “CON-DEM’d.”

    I will never vote for any candidate whose staffer uses that pathetic, childish term of abuse. Grow up, already.

    Jennie has my vote.

  • Susan would be fantastic as President. She was a hard working member of FE, our best Mayoral candidate and the people of Richmond Park were very foolish to lose her as their MP.

  • I agree that Ros Scott was an excellent President who engaged with the membership. Her successor must have the time to devote to the role and, just as importantly, it must be their primary focus. Susan Kramer would, I believe, be a very good choice.

  • Neil Mackinnon 18th Sep '10 - 6:30pm

    The Party President needs to have first rate advocacy skills above all else, a sure footed media performer with a nationwide reach. I think that rules out everyone mentioned in this article.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 18th Aug - 2:35am
    @ Joe Bouke “A startling statistic is the projection of 250,000 extra households a year until 2033.” I have not seen this forecast. I had...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 18th Aug - 2:33am
    @ Nonconformistradical “On what do you base your choice of arbitrary cut-off year?” If I can justify 1971 is it arbitrary? 2017-67+21 = 1971 You...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 1:10am
    John writes a very clever and interesting piece, we could do more of this, radical centre stuff and get somewhere with a slate of policies....
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 12:59am
    As ever terrific responses from Katharine and Catherine, we need you both , and do not want this absurd policy idea to water down our...
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 18th Aug - 12:48am
    Three contributions show why my kind of approach here , centre ,centre left , radical and moderate centre , centre left , is the essence...
  • User AvatarLittle Jackie Paper 17th Aug - 11:09pm
    frankie - On contracts etc - The Posted Workers Directives are a big problem though. See here, p27 and p36-40 in particular http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579001/IPOL_STU(2016)579001_EN.pdf If some...