Policy development – mainstreaming equalities!

Liberal Democrat Voice at Conference

On Lib Dem Voice: Reportage | Live Twitter Stream | Contribute
On the official party website: Conference home
Watch Live on BBC Parliament

If you have been reading your papers for conference, you might have noticed something new. Tucked away at the back of the policy papers is a page headed ‘Policy Equality Impact Assessment’. If you work in the public sector, you may already be familiar with these, as they have been compulsory in schools, hospitals and other public institutions for some time now. As a political party, we are not expected to complete such assessments as a matter of course, but have started to introduce them as a sign of our own commitment to the principles of diversity, equality and best practice. I’m really pleased to report that the Federal Policy Committee (FPC) through the work of Debbie Enever has led the way by introducing them on policy papers.

A lonely side of A4 at the back of a long policy document, you might erroneously dismiss this as a mere tick-box exercise, but the new process of evaluating the diversity and equality impacts of our policies goes much deeper than that. The FPC has set up a Policy Equality Impact Assessments Group under the leadership of Linda Jack and with representation from the Party’s Diversity Engagement Group (DEG) to feed in comments and suggestions on policy papers at all stages of their development to ensure that we are truly mainstreaming diversity and equalities thinking throughout the policy making process.

The Liberal Democrats have always been the party most committed to diversity and equalities issues, as our often quoted preamble explains, we exist to “build and safeguard a fair, free and open society, in which we seek to balance the fundamental values of liberty, equality and community, and in which no-one shall be enslaved by poverty, ignorance or conformity. … We aim to disperse power, to foster diversity and to nurture creativity.” A commitment to diversity and equalities is already at our core. By introducing equality impact assessments, we are ensuring that not only are we committed, and not only are we seen to be committed, but we are actually doing it.

Issan Ghazni is National Diversity Adviser for the Liberal Democrats

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference and Party policy and internal matters.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Peters 21st Oct - 8:52pm
    @paul holmes I believe rump X or rX to be in fairly common usage. The UK is referred to as rump UK or rUK when...
  • User AvatarChristopher Haigh 21st Oct - 8:27pm
    It is difficult to understand that the local authority allowed slag heaps at the top of valley sides and along the spring line.
  • User AvatarCliff Wilkes 21st Oct - 8:24pm
    "For too long, Britons have got used to having everything and conceding nothing to others. I am afraid we have to get used to it...
  • User Avatarpaul holmes 21st Oct - 8:24pm
    @john peters. "The rump EU........". So the UK leaves and the remaining 27 out of 28 Members are the rump? Such a perspective explains something...
  • User AvatarGlenn 21st Oct - 8:20pm
    Al The population of Scotland is about 5 million. The population of England is about 53 million. The thing is people don't want to emigrate...
  • User AvatarMary Reid 21st Oct - 8:15pm
    Does anyone know how many states use that kind of voting machine?