Richard Benyon: did he break the rules on Parliamentary funds?

Following a tip-off from a constituent of Richard Benyon, Conservative MP for Newbury, I took a look at his website, which states:

This site is the responsibility of Richard Benyon MP and is paid for from his Communications Allowance. [Click here for screenshot]

The Communications Allowance is one of the pots of public money MPs are given to help them do their jobs and therefore it comes with various restrictions, including (to put it simply) not using it for party political campaigning.

So I took a look at the site’s blog to see whether it kept to the rules. Or rather, I tried to look at the blog that is built in to the site (, but the blog has been removed from the site:

Not only are all the blog posts gone, but if you look on the right you will see a menu item entry about the blog (third down) that also no longer appears on other pages of the site.

All a bit rum, but courtesy of Google’s cached copy of the blog we can see what used to be there on the blog, which appeared to only have started on 15 September this year. We find political knock-about such as the following:

Last year’s conference season was electrifying for those interested in who is to run this country. Brown looked in fine fettle at the beginning of September. However, he underwhelmed in his conference speech which left it to David Cameron to see if the “clunking fist” could be bettered. The Conservatives pulled some headline grabbing policies out of the hat and Cameron made the speech of his life. Really quite exceptional both in his delivery (without any real notes) and in its content. The tables turned and have stayed that way with Tory wins in London, the local elections and some amazing by-elections. [Click here for screenshot]

All fairly standard policital commentary you might think, but why should the taxpayer be funding a website to carry such content? It looks like a very straight-forward case of the rules over this funding having been broken. Given the blog has now been removed, it certainly looks as if Richard Benyon (or his staff) have now had the same thought.

UPDATE: This story has now been confirmed by the local newspaper, which reports that Richard Benyon was warned by the Parliamentary authorities.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.


  • He may have broken the rules but someone obviously realised quickly and corrected the error.

  • A pretty fundamental error though, wouldn’t you say? The line about ‘paid for by the Communications Allowance’ is on every page of his website. But he clearly didn’t give that a moment’s thought.

    How did ‘someone realise very quickly’? Someone added a blog comment informing him of the rules of which he was clearly ignorant. Specifically, me.

    It may well have been an honest mistake. But frankly it does call into question the whole nature of the communications allowance. What is there for an MP to say that isn’t apolitical?

    For the record: I see all trace of the blog has now been removed. No mention in the navigation, and no news announcement on the homepage. It just didn’t happen, right? The evidence is still visible at though.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User Avatarpaul barker 22nd Aug - 5:17pm
    This article seems a bit confused. As far as I can see the Conference Motion says nothing about our call for a real Vote on...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 22nd Aug - 5:17pm
    Ooops. HTML fail: only per se should be italicised.
  • User AvatarMalcolm Todd 22nd Aug - 5:12pm
    Well said. About the most sober and intelligent reflections I've yet seen on this dreadful business.
  • User Avatarpaul barker 22nd Aug - 4:55pm
    I agree with most of the article but Champion went well beyond answering questions. She wrote for The Sun & approved the Headline - those...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 22nd Aug - 4:46pm
    James, I think it is about taking the lessons of economic theory and making it work for those at the bottom of the pile. The...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 22nd Aug - 4:44pm
    @P.J. "plunged into another G.E. with no resolution or agreed song sheet" I agree that this is a real danger for Lib Dems. Other than...