Three-quarters of Lib Dem manifesto becoming government policy – independent research

Sunday’s Politics Show featured the results of research by independent academics into how each party in the Coalition Government is doing at getting its polices enacted.

The conclusion? Three-quarters (75%) of the Liberal Democrat manifesto is being turned into government policy, compared to noticeably less (60%) of the Conservative manifesto, as illustrated in this screenshot:

Politics Show screenshot

(For a sample of those Lib Dem policies being put into action see the excellent site What The Hell Have The Lib Dems Done?)

Conservative blogger Tim Montgomerie and Lib Dem blogger and Federal Policy Committee (FPC) member Linda Jack were both interviewed to discuss these results and other aspects of the coalition’s future:

More talk on coalition and electoral reform

I was also on the BBC yesterday talking about the future of the coalition on The Westminster Hour, with Tim Montgomerie again and, for Labour, Hopi Sen. You can listen again here.

As if that wasn’t enough for bloggers on the BBC, a few hours earlier, I had been over in the BBC studios talking AV with Shane Greer:

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.

One Comment

  • Is there a link to the original report with the details of the 75% vs 60% figure?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Evans 22nd Oct - 1:33am
    @Paul Barker - I fear you are reading a bit more into my post than is called for when you say "its common practise to...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:44am
    @ James “free movement of Labour is untenable for a progressive party” (sic). It is a great shame we can’t consider if free movement of...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 22nd Oct - 12:05am
    @ Paul Barker “I have to say that I dont get this 26 Seats business” Newshound provided this figure. He/She should justify this figure. Our...
  • User Avatarmalc 21st Oct - 11:28pm
    During the referendum campaign most - if not all - of the leading "brexiteers" said that anyone already in the UK should be allowed to...
  • User Avatarfrankie 21st Oct - 10:37pm
    El Sid "I was initially in favour of staying in the EU but the campaign persuaded me to vote leave." I rather doubt that given...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 21st Oct - 10:32pm
    @DavidEvans. On this site its common practise to read someones comment before you criticise it. The 34 MPs figure has been widely quoted but it...