Following up my piece on what they said about the Speaker in the nineteenth century, here’s what the Quarterly Review wrote in 1830:
There is something in the very atmosphere of the House unfavourable to bold and uncompromising conduct. It is, de facto, a sort of overgrown club. This is the worst part of the business. Things are every day admitted in private among the members, which are studiously denied or concealed in the speeches reported from the gallery. (January 1830, p.271-2)
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
An early win for affordable housing – now let councils build (Victor Chamberlain)
Defining our future in Burnham Britain (Gareth McAleer)
Andy Burnham – new messiah or naughty boy? (Mark Hunter)
“Palestine should be run by Palestinians” so why won’t Britain reckon with what it did? (Alex Cole-Hamilton)
You can’t defend your way to a World Cup… or No. 10 (Tom Reeve)
Django Django: Cameos
Is Farage set to lose Clacton?
Citizenship ceremony
Welsh Lib Dems are short of peers and the Lords is weighted towards London and the South East of England
Another myth exploded: Queen Victoria and the lesbians
"Everyone carried a shopping bag": Muriel Spark on London, 1945
Lloyd George Society Chair - Welsh Lib Dem Peers face extinction
Saving the curlew from extinction in Shropshire
The cinema in a church that became a curry house
David Evans David Evans 
Peter Martin Peter Martin 
expats 
2 Comments
……..and in those times there was a great call for reform of “the system”…
…followed by the 1832 Reform Act.
Isn’t that what we need now?
In 1830 there were 658 M.P.s all drawn from the beu monde wealth of mainly England and Wales `Rotten and Pocket Borough’ constituencies.There were 513 M.P.s from England and Wales alone and 100 M.P.s from Ireland.
The idle and filthy rich Tory Duke of Norfolk and Earl of Londsdale, respectively, could boast of 11 and 9 `Pocket Boroughs’ .
Their hegemony was opposed, by the Whig Leaders, including Viscounts Landsdowne and Althorp, whom supported the passage of the Parliamentary Motion entitled:
‘This House must effective Measures for correcting diverse Abuses, that have long prevailed in the choices of Members to serve in the Commons House of Parliament’
Incidentally, in 1830 Totnes, in Devon was one of the Tory `Rotten Boroughs’ .
`Pocket Boroughs’ were where patronage and bribery was the order of the day and where only the titled,or the landed gentry, were either deemed fit for Office or moreover, able to pay sufficient acolytes, to purchase their Seats in Parliament.
The First Reform Act 1832 took 3 attempts and 3 Bills to eventually secure a reluctant passage through Parliament.
There were `Riots’ and withdrawal of a million of gold bullion from the coffers of the Bank of England, at the prospect of giving a mere 550,000 male householders, the vote, out of a UK population of 14 million.
The Reform Act 1832 did increase the voters base by 60% but was a small concession to democracy.
There were no working class voters or representatives or women voters, until 1918.
I shudder to draw the obvious parallel between the corrupt practice of Government in 1832 and present day.
I believe,however, that many voters will ask why has the curtain been pulled over their eyes by this Government, for so long ?
Why has this veil been held over the eyes ordinary voters and so disingenuously,since 1997,by a Government supposedly elected, to represent the worst off members of our community?
I ask is there any difference between the High Tory arrogance of 1832 and the High Labour greedy hubris of 2009?