When is a new website not a new website?

Bizarre is probably the best word for it.

You see, earlier today Ed Miliband proudly “launched” the LabourSpace website. Now I thought this all seemed a bit familiar, and indeed on checking I found Alex Hilton (of LabourHome and Recess Monkey) was writing about the site having been launched back in November 2006. So not really so much of a launch today if it was actually launched 26 months ago?

Ah, but you might say, perhaps the launch 26 months ago was a beta and today is the final version. Er, no. Because post-“launch” the site still producly calls itself Beta 0.2 (and yes, I did all the boring stuff to ensure that I wasn’t viewing any cached images):

LabourSpace screenshot

There’s then a rather weird slanging match between Labour and the Tories after the Tories issued a press release poking fun at Labour re-announcing something they’d already announced and Labour / LabourList dishing out the insults in return, but without ever actually explaining, “If you’re trying to explain away all this by saying the launch is about LabourSpace no longer being in beta, why is it still saying in nice letters right at the top ‘Beta 0.2?'”

Indeed, it does leave LabourList looking rather silly for mocking the Tories for supposedly not noticing that LabourSpace used to say at the top of the site that it was in beta without apparently noticing themselves that it still says at the top of the site that it is in beta.

Aaah, internet politics; ain’t it great?

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

10 Comments

  • Silent Hunter 21st Jan '09 - 10:41pm

    As those who know me at Cif….I am NOT Labours greatest fan LOL (yes, I know!)

    BUT…….I HAVE been able to leave a comment at LabourList, which hasn’t been pre-moderated (as happens on just about every other Labour Blog)

    That’s a good start.

    I have left a mildly (for me) anti Labour comment / request for more info…..so let’s see if they are robust enough for Free Speech.

    I will let you know.

  • Silent Hunter 21st Jan '09 - 10:42pm

    Now that’s interesting!

    THIS site, clearly IS pre-moderated.

    So, where’s the Freedom of Speech here then?

  • Non-silent hunter 21st Jan '09 - 11:07pm

    Mark, can you please start liking to Labourist instead of Labourlist?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 11th Dec - 5:37am
    John, St. Theresa is the most illiberal Prime Minister since Margaret Thatcher... Do you like her?
  • User AvatarAndrew McCaig 11th Dec - 5:24am
    Well, usually I try to refrain from commenting on Castro... But I do prefer global measures like infant mortality rates to anecdotal stories (which possibly...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 11th Dec - 1:25am
    Cuba has many faults, but it's not a capitalist country so one might expect differences from the accepted (?) norms here. What Cuba has got...
  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 11th Dec - 1:05am
    Hello, friends, I have been having terrible trouble with access to the site just lately, which accounts for this late comment. Arnold, thank you for...
  • User AvatarDavid Evans 11th Dec - 12:56am
    Simon, "Labour realising the stupidity of their opposing AV." When did you last come across Labour relaising its stupidity? Come on be honest! :-)
  • User AvatarSimon Shaw 11th Dec - 12:43am
    @Peter Watson "... means that there will be little appetite for electoral reform and proportional representation for the foreseeable future." I don't think that follows....