Will your area be losing an MEP?

The Electoral Commission has published its proposals for reducing the number of British MEPs from 78 to 72. The cut is driven by the expansion of the EU, with the number of MEPs countries have being reduced so that the total size of the European Parliament doesn’t swell to ridiculous proportions.

Their proposals don’t automatically become law, but it’s extremely likely that they will. So here’s how things are likely to be looking at the next European elections: East Midlands, London, North West, South West, West Midlands and Scotland each lose one MEP.

Full details on the Electoral Commission’s website.

Share:
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1111 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

9 Comments

  • nigelashton
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    This has been known to be likely in the North West for ages. With two Lib Dem MEPs, one of whom was elected 9th of 9 last time, the order on the list is going to be crucial . However, as the Party is growing in strength in the NW I am hopeful that we can retain both seats.

  • Posted 2nd August 2007 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    A devastating loss.

  • Andrea
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    if those proposals had been applied in 2004, LDs would have not win the second seat in North West and their seat in East Midlands.
    The East Midlands seat is probably quite easy to hold (or to notionally gain it) in 2009. LD quota was 181,964 for the 6th seat and UKIP got the 5th seat with a 183,249 quota. They got 2 seats in EM last time with Kilroy aheading their list…it’s very unlikely that they would get a similar performance next time and so it should be easy for LDs to pass UKIP’s second seat quota.

  • Graeme
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Not as devastating as yours would be, Laurence :-)

  • Benjamin Mathis
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Probably just being selfish but I particularly feel annoyed about losing a London seat as if you take into account the massive influx of people in recent years from within the UK and elsewhere, we are already significantly underrepresented.

  • Antony Hook
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Hmm, I think you will find London has 5 out of the UK’s 24 seats on the Committee of Regions, which is over represrentation by some measure.

  • Dafs
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    And of course the process will instigated each time the EU enlarges. By the time we deal with Turkey and the Ukraine we’ll have about 50 MEPs. Not sure how that helps the EU’s democratic deficit.

  • Benjamin Mathis
    Posted 2nd August 2007 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Yeah – perhaps we should add that the the One Seat campaign. If we don’t have to afford the upkeep of Strasbourg maybe we can afford the expenses for a decent tally of MEP’s.

  • Richard Church
    Posted 3rd August 2007 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    It’s hard to see the next Euro elections being stand alone. The May council elections could be moved to the same day, in which case there will be more local activity to get the vote out, or the general election will be on the same day. Maybe all three?

    Either could be to our advantage and UKIP etc’s disadvantage.

    I’m cheered by Andrea’s analysis of the East Midlands. We were I think the only region not to lose an MEP last time, so we have known it was almost inevitable we would be one down this time.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?