Author Archives: Tim Connolly

Opinion: Youth justice – a golden opportunity for the Lib Dems

Youth justice has risen, zombie-like, from the place unloved political issues go to die. In July, the Government published an interim report on The Youth Crime Action Plan, its “comprehensive, cross-government analysis of what the government is going to do to tackle youth crime.”

This prompted vigorous activity from the think-tanks and NGOs, and a predictable silence from the dead who may live again, aka the Conservative Party.

Last week, the Liberal Democrats published data showing that the number of 10 to 12 year olds convicted of a criminal offence rose by 87.2% between 1997 and 2007. Nick Clegg, remarking on the figures, argued that:

It is a disgrace the Government spends eleven times more locking up our young people than it does on backing projects to stop them getting involved in crime in the first place.”

Unless you happen to be keen on nineteenth century penal philosophy, Nick’s comment seems to make excellent sense. I would suggest, however, that it is, at best, carelessly imprecise. At worst, it indicates a refusal to challenge the prevailing conservative narrative on youth crime. Given recent reporting of events in Doncaster, a measured rebuttal is more critical than ever.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , , , , , and | 3 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    @Tristan Ward - "So, assuming there are no tax loopholes, what is the point of earning another £1 if the government take away 83p of it?" Depends on ...
  • David Warren
    It's a great pity that we only have one candidate who is eligible for this key role!...
  • John Kelly
    I guess we knew it but nonetheless it is disappointing that year after year the autumn Conference these days is always on the south coast - reinforcing the sout...
  • Tristan Ward
    @PM "The big divide is between {property owners} and renters. If you are serious about tacking inequality we’d need to factor in the economic benefits ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Roland "whilst the salary was taxed at 98% there were other ways (before 1979) of taking the monies tax free". I'm not really sure what your point is. ...