Tag Archives: 2026 world cup

Tom Arms’ World Review

NATO

The NATO summit was a wild diplomatic roller coaster ride. But then, how could it be otherwise with President Donald J. Trump in attendance.

Ankara was another example of his negotiating style: Start with the maximalist position delivered in the loudest and most belligerent style and then gradually back away from that and claim a happy agreement which is probably nowhere near the truth.

Trump arrived demanding Denmark give him Greenland. If the Danes refused, he would withdraw all US troops from Europe. He also said that the US was ending all trade with Spain because of Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s refusal to let Trump use American airbases for attacks on Iran, or even to allow him to use Spanish airspace. Finally, he attacked Iranians “as vicious scum” and again criticised NATO allies for refusing to help him in the Middle East.

It didn’t work. Denmark, backed by the rest of the alliance, stood firm on Greenland and the Europeans are turning a deaf ear and blind eye to his rants about Iran. Trump started the war. He can finish it.

Spain is more interesting. US companies have billions invested in Spain and the trade between the two countries runs into billions more. Ending trade is not that simple and is self-defeating. Trump has instructed lawyers to come up with a plan. They will likely come up with some form of selective tariffs, but even that is difficult because of Spain’s membership of the EU.

What Trump achieved in Ankara was more headlines that he thinks made him look good for his MAGA base. What the rest of the Alliance achieved is confirmation that they are right to increase defence spending; become less dependent on American-built weaponry; become politically more independent of America and to continue to work towards becoming a separate Western political pillar supported by their own military-industrial complex.

Ukraine

Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky went to Ankara hoping to buy more American Patriot missile systems. He left with a licence to manufacture them.

For months Donald Trump’s approach to Ukraine has been characterised by pressure on Kyiv. He has attacked Zelensky, paused aid, presented himself as the equidistant honest broker between Russia and Ukraine when he was leaning heavily towards Russia.

Then came Ankara. Trump publicly praised Zelensky. He spoke of his “very good relationship” with the Ukrainian leader. And then…Trump presents Ukraine with the gift of the license to manufacture Patriot air defence missiles in Ukraine.

Ukraine now ceases to be merely a consumer of Western weaponry (although its drone manufacturers were also steering Ukraine towards weapons independence) and becomes a producer of Western weapons. The licence to produce inside Ukraine also means that replacement missiles and components can be manufactured and moved more quickly to the frontline.

The license also represents another step towards integrating Ukraine into the Western defence-industrial base without having to grant it NATO membership.

But why the change in Trump’s policy? Mainly because the gods of war are starting to move to Ukraine’s side. For years, Vladimir Putin had Trump convinced that he was “holding the cards” in the Ukraine war. That there was no way that the Russian steam roller could lose.

Ukraine is not winning. But neither is it losing. The Russians continue to throw waves of suicidal attacks against a seemingly impenetrable Ukrainian frontline. Meanwhile the Ukrainians have started to score points with long-range drone attacks on Russian oil installations and factories.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 2 Comments

Good luck Scotland and England

In less than 6 hours’ time, Scotland will play their first World Cup match against Haiti in Boston.

I’ll be honest. I struggle to care about football unless it involves Inverness Caledonian Thistle or Ross County, and even then I don’t actually have to watch it.

I knew so little about this World Cup that it was only last night that I realised that the Scotland game was in the middle of tonight. I’d previously assumed that because the Scottish Government had made Monday a bank holiday (which only 6 of the 32 Scottish local authorities are taking) that the match had to be in the middle of Sunday night.

My first experience of the World Cup was in 1978, when Scotland qualified to go to Argentina and I was totally caught up in the hype of Ally’s Tartan Army. I also had a monster crush on Kenny Dalglish. I was incredibly disappointed at the outcome – typically, we beat Holland, but lost to and drew with teams who were below us in the international rankings.

Fast forward nearly 50 years and here we are again. Several of my friends are over there in Boston – some staying for the whole tournament. Some people have spent thousands on travel and accommodation. You would have to have a heart of stone not bo be moved by the sight of the Tartan Army in Boston’s hostelries and squares. When an American reporter described them as “perfectly unhinged” last night, I seriously had never been prouder.

I would like nothing better than for the Scottish team to fight their way to the Final and then, after a brilliant game in which every single player excelled themselves, score in the last minute to take the trophy. But I can dream that without needing to watch a single game.

I hope that everyone who is sitting up tonight has a marvellous time. And I know that there are people of many nationalities reading this. Let’s just hope we have a tournament that brings joy.

Anyway, newly elected Scottish Lib Dem MSPs Sanne Dijkstra-Downie and Adam Harley had a chat about the World Cup the other day.

Sanne describes a recurring nightmare of the Dutch team that will be familiar to England fans too. Let’s hope that we don’t end up with too many blood-pressure busting penalty shootouts.

Happy World Cup everyone!

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 11 Comments

The World Cup and the Olympics should not be showcases for Trumpism or America First

In January of this year alone, Donald Trump has undermined the international rule of law and the postwar global order, all in the name of ‘Making America Great Again’. He ordered the capture of President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela to combat America’s drug problem and potentially to access Venezuelan oil and raised the prospect of an intra-NATO war to obtain Greenland.

While I and others are grateful that UK and European leaders have been able to stand up to Trump and get him to back down over Greenland, the wider international community needs to be more assertive. This year, the United States will host the FIFA Men’s World Cup in tandem with Canada and Mexico, while in 2028 Los Angeles is scheduled to host the Olympics for a third time. In light of the Trump administration’s actions, there is a case that the US should not host either event and that they should be relocated. While it would only make sense for the World Cup fixtures to be hosted by another CONCACAF member, we should not argue that Britain is the only possible alternative for the Olympics.

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license

A cross-party group of MPs including Liberal Democrats has proposed that the US be expelled from FIFA over American actions in Venezuela. While perfectly understandable, I fear that this course of action may unduly punish a future America that has managed to shake off Trump and Trumpism. Relocating sporting fixtures to be held in his America would be the more direct and proportionate response. With both England and Scotland taking part in the World Cup, I am inclined to ask who would support both teams boycotting the tournament?

Recent American immigration policy has shown no regard for the wellbeing of American citizens, let alone foreign nationals. Trump has pushed for the revocation of birthright citizenship – a right enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment as part of the abolition of slavery – and aggressive immigration enforcement has led to the deportation and bodily harm of Americans and the death of the blameless Renee Nicole Good.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 9 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    @Peter Martin “ You might well end up thinking the 60% of median incomes level is too conservative” You make my point for me. A definition of poverty ba...
  • Geoff Reid
    Well done Glasgow and a wider Scotland. However we are left with a Britain in which alas if you have loads of money and tell loads of lies you can get lots of "...
  • Mark Smulian
    This debate is rather academic so long as the construction industry's skill shortages remain unsolved. This report last year from a large social landlord throws...
  • Neil Sandison
    Jason Connor as a council tenant i do take umbrage at the language used. And rightly so renters .council ,social , or private are a significant part of our adul...
  • Peter Davies
    I'm a little sceptical when the government announces what someone else is going to do. In this case, council house building requires the active participation of...