Tag Archives: cadbury’s

Easter egg hunt furore – something of the ridiculous?

Can you see the word “Easter” in the image above? The image is a screenshot of the National Trust website for its Easter activity.

Yet, Theresa May saw fit to interrupt her visit to Saudi Arabia to criticise Cadbury’s and the National Trust for calling the activity an “Egg Hunt” rather than a “Easter Egg Hunt” – even though Easter is emblazoned above the title.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 15 Comments

LibLink … Vince Cable: Mandelson melted like a creme egg as the vultures swooped

Over at the Mail, Lib Dem shadow chancellor Vince Cable writes about Kraft’s takeover of Cadbury, arguing that government policy has failed in three ways: by ignoring the damage mergers do to the economy; by refusing to curb the company voting rights of short-term speculators; and by letting a state-owned bank lend the money which sealed the deal. Here’s an excerpt:

I feel for the Cadbury workers, but that alone is not enough explanation for the anger over the deal and the significance of the takeover. Nor is the fact that Kraft is American. Britain has long been open to foreign

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged , , and | 3 Comments

When should the state intervene? RBS, Kraft & Cadbury and the Eternal Liberal Dilemma

US firm Kraft’s proposed takeover of Cadbury’s has made headlines in recent days. First, because it’s a major, historic British brand being snapped-up by a non-UK business (or ‘foreign predator’, as Vince Cable labels them). Secondly, because of the fear that job losses will result. And, thirdly, because of the role of the Royal Bank of Scotland – in which the British government has a majority stake-holding – in lending the money to Kraft which will fund its acquisition of Cadbury’s.

The Lib Dems – in the shape of Nick Clegg and Vince – have sharply questioned the role of the Government in the takeover. At Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday, Nick asked Gordon Brown:

… there is a simple principle at stake. Tens of thousands of British companies are crying out for that money to protect jobs, and instead RBS wants to lend it to a multinational with a record of cutting jobs. When British taxpayers bailed out the banks, they would never have believed that their money would be used to put British people out of work. Is that not just plain wrong?

Posted in Op-eds and PMQs | Also tagged , , , , , , , , , , and | 11 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGeoffrey Dron 15th Sep - 3:51pm
    @David Dobbie - yes, but what sort of EU? An empire which will replace nation states? https://order-order.com/2019/09/14/lib-dems-applaud-call-eu-become-empire/ A lot of us 2016 remain voters would...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 15th Sep - 3:51pm
    Automated responses are given. That’s the problem - they are automated. If I wanted to give money to a speak-your-weight machine I would walk down...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 15th Sep - 3:42pm
    We have had 3 Mps each from Labour & The Tories, 4 of those defections in the last 12 Days. Its small beginnings but there...
  • User Avatarexpats 15th Sep - 3:38pm
    David Raw 15th Sep '19 - 2:34pm.................Time to encourage and support local authorities to build council houses again... I agree but WITHOUT the 'right to...
  • User AvatarAdam 15th Sep - 3:29pm
    "Parliamentary democracy should be representative, the responsibility of the representatives being as defined by Edmund Burke in his famous response to the electors of Bristol."...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 15th Sep - 3:25pm
    I frequently send donations to HQ, I would be cross if I got a letter of thanks in return as it would be a waste...
Thu 10th Oct 2019