Tag Archives: CANZUK

Why liberals should back CANZUK

Reading the Financial Times is not for the easily troubled. At once the news it is mission-bound to report is confusing, intimidating, and depressing when the reader becomes aware of just how much money we don’t have and trivialities on which the rest of it is being spent. 

However, amidst the gloom of flicking through the pink ‘un these days, there is the occasional flicker of light, such as the recent article featuring Sir Ed Davey in which the Lib Dem leader endorsed a great idea – a closer working relationship between Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and our own United Kingdom. 

The notion has a snappy name, it’s called CANZUK, and liberals should support it.

But, CANZUK has an image problem in liberal minds. The idea has previously been misrepresented as a colonialist retread and championed by those who suggested it’s a better alternative to the European Union. The reality is far from that. 

In fact, it is a drawing together of the nations of the world who have gained the most from the fine tradition of British liberty found in the pages of Mill, Hume, Smith, and Locke and whose lineage disappears into the fog of time on these islands. As for being an alternative to the EU, why think so small? 

A throat-clearing is required here. I believe that Brexit was a huge mistake and has left us poorer, more isolated, less confident, and more exposed to global shocks. I am no Brexiteer and would prefer it had never happened. 

Posted in News | Also tagged , , and | 5 Comments

Brexit, our Party`s Future and CANZUK (Canada, New Zealand, Australia and UK)

CANZUK and dependencies

On Friday the UK left the European Union and has now entered a transitional period, intended to develop a trade agreement with the EU and other areas in the world. I feel, therefore, that it is important to discuss what our party should be doing moving forward, and can see that there will be a good deal of debate over this and the options, most likely: rejoin as soon as possible, rejoin after a time or other alternatives. Here, I shall make the argument for the latter case and chiefly examine what I believe to be our next best option, a CANZUK (Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the UK) Agreement.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 39 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • nigel hunter
    I would not be surprised if the 'NEETS' are steered into the construction industries.There are many jobs in the field from labourer to architect. The social sti...
  • Peter Davies
    Dilnot did not propose a tax but a subsidy. That's how he convinced so many people that such an amazingly unfair proposal was acceptable....
  • Ruth Bright
    Agreed - I think people support it because it's there....
  • Tristan Ward
    @Peter Martin and Jana I think I’m with Jana on this one. The real test of a satisfactory level of income/resources should surely be an amount, taking tax...
  • paul barker
    I have found the Rebirth & Expansion of The Far-Right extremely depressing. We need to admit to ourselves that We, the whole of The Liberal/Progressive/Femi...