Tag Archives: pairing

Jo Swinson on the lack of urgency to change Parliament’s voting system

Jo was understandably furious when her pairing arrangement with the Tory chair, Brandon Lewis, was violated. She spoke about the experience at the Edinburgh International Book Festival yesterday evening.

According to the Express and Star, she said:

The mechanism of pairing is outdated and just doesn’t work.

We need a different system, which would be proxy voting, so that when you had an MP that was on parental leave, they would entrust another MP of their choice to vote on their behalf.

This is something that the House of Commons actually discussed earlier this year, and one of the committees went away and did a lot of work on how technically that could work, and produced some motions that parliament could vote on.

But those changes have been “kicked into the long grass” by the Government.

Posted in News | Also tagged | 4 Comments

Leadsom, Lewis and Smith in trouble over Jo Swinson pairing scandal

Remember when the Tories cheated in order to win the tight vote in Parliament, just like Vote Leave cheated to win the EU Referendum?

Tory Chairman Brandon Lewis, paired with Jo Swinson who was at home with her two week old baby, should not have voted on Tuesday night. He honoured that in the first few, but in the really crucial ones, on the European Medicines Agency (which the Government lost) and the customs union, (which the Government narrowly won), he cast his vote. Now, had he voted in the earlier divisions, Alistair Carmichael, our Chief Whip, might have noticed …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , , and | 15 Comments
Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Jul - 10:02am
    As a former Convenor (Cabinet member) for Social Care in Scotland, I must say how refreshing it is to hear from somebody as well qualified,...
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Jul - 9:43am
    @Peter Martin The reason I asked you to come up with arguments as to why people disagree with you is because I'm trying to work...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 5th Jul - 9:39am
    "Reduce the number of people in poverty by 25%". Why 25%, or 24%, or 26% ? Don't the other 75% matter ?
  • User AvatarGeorge Kendall 5th Jul - 9:27am
    @Peter Kenny I wonder if you're responding to the headline, rather than the article. Did you register that the title talks about the hard left,...
  • User AvatarJohn Pugh 5th Jul - 9:02am
    Sharp observers here have picked up on the power of patronage as a device to control dissent when things were going wrong. I used to...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 8:08am
    "Reduce the number of people in poverty by 25%.. " Maybe the Lib Dem constitution should also read "At least 25% fewer people shall be...