“The party certainly owes Charles Kennedy a great debt, and it is £2.4 million.”

In the event that the Electoral Commission, more than a year and a half after Michael Brown’s £2.4m donations were received, DO decide they must be repaid, then it seems likely following Menzies Campbell’s performance on Sunday A.M. this week that the party will appeal the accompanying court order.

The Times reports that the party is making arrangements to create a fund to help fight any such appeal.

One interesting line from the story: “The Lib Dem leader is privately furious with his predecessor for leaving the party with the damaging saga.” Clearly not that privately, as it’s in the Times.

Whatever happens in this ongoing saga, it’s important that the current administration should not publicly cast aspersions on the previous administration – such recrimination will not leave Menzies Campbell looking squeaky clean, it will tar the party as a whole.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Paul Walter Paul Walter 1st Nov '06 - 7:14pm

    Agreed Rob. The right research seems to have been done before the money was accepted. Who can say what we would have done in the shoes of the people who accepted the money? I suspect the esteemed Lord Rennard was more instrumental in accepting this loan than Charlie boy and I trust Chris’ judgment wholeheartedly. I remember Paddy turning down £1million from Al Fayed, but that was a little more clear cut. I’ll happily chip in with my share of the £2.4M. At least we know Rowntree has given us a shot in the arm – albeit that their monies cannot be used to pay off the loan.

  • I agree. This is pathetic. Indeed, what abour Rennard and Razzall et al.

    I doubt that CK had much to do with the loan at all, but it is amazing how SOME people seem to be teflon coated…..

  • It is interesting to note that your comment;
    Clearly not that privately, as it’s in the Times

    and lib dem watch’s comment

    We suppose that if he was publicly furious we wouldn’t be reading about it in the newspapers.

    Are almost the same it cant be very often the two sites agree.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • PM
    @ Mick, @ Jana "What services are you going to cut to get taxes down?" I've just noticed that Rob Blackie, in his latest post, has quoted a fig...
  • Peter Davies
    While I agree that private development will bring down prices and eventually rents, presumption against building in the planning laws is not the major problem. ...
  • Simon McGrath
    The picture is in the article if put through an AI detector comes out as high probability AI generated...
  • Simon McGrath
    @James, it is quite clearly to to pass itself off as associated with the Party by using the party name. The website is very odd. There are lots of strange b...
  • Hywel
    Also they don't identify who the data controller is, just say you will be notified about this if you sign up. When you go to sign up it asks for a number of bi...