Conservative expenses scandals spread
Written by The Voice on 6th June 2008 – 11:18 pm
Posted in Europe / International, Opposition watch
Posted in Europe / International, Opposition watch
- Most Read
- Recent Comments
- Op-eds
- Lembit to star in next 'Celebrity Big Brother'?
- Tell us, dear LDV readers: what gets you up in the mornings?
- NEW POLL: if offered the job by Gordon, should Vince accept the post of Chancellor?
- Opinion: For the sake of Israel, the attack on Gaza must stop!
- Opinion: January Reshuffle – Big Surprises and the Liberal ‘Big Beasts’ (Part I)
Liberal Democrat Voice is an independent, collaborative website run by Liberal Democrat activists, where any individual inside or outside the party can express their views. Views expressed on this website are those of the individuals who express them and may not reflect those of the party.
-
Adverts
-
Recent Posts
- LDV readers say: yes to Church of England disestablishment
- Clegg: time for “big, permanent and fair tax cuts”, not Tories’ “fake giveaway”
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 12)
- Opinion: We mustn’t forget Burma
- Enough is enough
- Someone’s attacked you online; should you respond?
- Tell us, dear LDV readers: what gets you up in the mornings?
- Reasons to like Twitter…
- Opinion: Are we really going to learn anything at all from this mess?
- How much have you paid Alesha Dixon?
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 11)
- Christmas Catchup
- Latest pension scandal to rock government
- The five blogs nicest to the Lib Dems in 2008
- Clegg “deleted”
- NEW POLL: if offered the job by Gordon, should Vince accept the post of Chancellor?
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 10)
- Openness and transparency in statistical releases
- Nick Clegg, Jo Swinson in the news
- Conservatives continue to take money from peer who broke his tax promise
- The top five local Liberal Democrat websites in 2008
- A look back at the polls: December ‘08
- LDV Awards 2008: Liberal Voice and Defining Moment of the Year
- Clegg - Lib Dem stealth bomber?
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 9)
- Lembit and Nick in Grauniad’s most well-read top 10
- Ros Scott writes… A New Year’s Message from the Party President
- LDV still doesn’t do statporn, but if we did… (Dec ‘08)
- Secure your passwords in Firefox: a security tip for the new year
- Ooops, small outage
- LDV Awards 2008: Political Journalist/Broadcaster and Political Programme of the Year
- Forthcoming PPC selections
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 8)
- Opinion: January Reshuffle – Big Surprises and the Liberal ‘Big Beasts’ (Part II)
- Whitehall prepares for policy talks with the Lib Dems
- Happy New Year from LDV!
- LDV Awards 2008: Lib Dem Campaigner of the Year & Most Desperate Press Release of the Year
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 7)
- Opinion: January Reshuffle – Big Surprises and the Liberal ‘Big Beasts’ (Part I)
- In the news: Gaza, Treasury honours and Big Brother
- Opinion: For the sake of Israel, the attack on Gaza must stop!
- What does Eric Pickles think of Andy Coulson’s salary?
- De-stress yourself, ready for the new year
- LDV Awards 2008: Lib Dem Politician of the Year & By-election Performance of the Year
- Labour PM delays election, saying “Neither the press nor the Tory party will fix it.”
- Eric Pickles slams Conservative councils for wasting money
- Five New Year resolutions for Lib Dem election candidates
- The 12 Op-Eds of Xmas (Day 6)
- LDV tops Iain Dale’s list of Lib Dem blogs
- Huhne reveals: 50 babies being raised by their convict mothers in prison
7th June 2008 at 1:41 am
Same old Tories…snouts in the trough.
7th June 2008 at 8:30 am
And let’s not forget Derek Conway, James Gray, Nigel Waterson, Andrew Pelling… Who else? I can see a theme here.
Could it be used somehow like this: “Don’t vote for ideologically and financially bankrupt Labour, nor for corrupted and criminal Tories”? Maybe LDV could have a competition in order to find something more rhyming.
7th June 2008 at 8:37 am
Actually, these stories make me nervous. Let he who is without sin and so on.
7th June 2008 at 8:58 am
OK, just hand the stone to me, if your hands are in dirt…
7th June 2008 at 11:53 am
Persoanlly I enjoy the weak excuses. The Spelman story that the Nanny worked for board and lodging in her childcare role and for cash as a secretary is classic. Everyone else seems to go for the “extreme stupidity” excuse: they cannot be expected to understand the rules.
7th June 2008 at 12:29 pm
The BBC quotes the nanny saying she remembers answering the phone to take some messages from time to time, and posting some letters. I’m not a fan of Guido’s, but he’s right - MPs engaged in this sort of deception are stealing from the public. If I nicked thousands of pounds out of an MP’s purse I’d be prosecuted, so why aresn’t MPs prosecuted when they steal thousands of pounds out of mine?
7th June 2008 at 1:46 pm
Before you all rush to condemn Caroline, please bear in mind that she is a trustee of the Conservative Christian Fellowship, so I’m sure she can’t have done anything wrong.
7th June 2008 at 2:02 pm
Hehe
7th June 2008 at 6:31 pm
Sorry Laurence, I don’t understand your point. She’s an MP and she’s used tax-payers’ cash to pay her nanny. And she’s rightly facing questions over her future. What does her work with the Conservative Christian Fellowship have to do with it?
7th June 2008 at 6:36 pm
Russ, I guess you don’t understand irony?
7th June 2008 at 6:50 pm
I’ve now watched her statement to the press from the gate of her large country house. This brings the mid-90s all back to me. What fun!
7th June 2008 at 7:29 pm
What is the difference in paying a nanny and claiming childcare expenses?
7th June 2008 at 7:38 pm
I’m fine with the irony. Let us assume that Laurence is suggesting Caroline’s involvement with the Conservative Christian Fellowship makes her wrongdoing somehow more heinous (or at least interesting) than if she wasn’t involved. My question is, why would that be the case? My own feeling is that it undermines a rock-solid case against corruption in Parliament if we get distracted by irrelevant innuendoes or existing prejudices.
If Laurence, or anyone else, wants to argue the relevance of Caroline’s work with the CCF, I’d invite them to do so.
7th June 2008 at 7:58 pm
I do wonder if Labour and LibDems need to be a bit cautious here. The Open Europe survey which started off this run of scandals found Labour and LibDem MEPs even more reluctant to disclose their expenses than Conservatives.
7th June 2008 at 7:58 pm
Let us assume that Laurence is suggesting Caroline’s involvement with the Conservative Christian Fellowship makes her wrongdoing somehow more heinous (or at least interesting) than if she wasn’t involved.
Well if I was doing that, it would be a fairly standard case of pointing out religious hypocrisy. But in fact what I really think is that being a Conservative Christian is a far greater crime than any mere financial scandal!
Especially this one which is looking like small beer . . .
7th June 2008 at 8:16 pm
Mmmm, the nanny’s statement in the last couple of hours does seem to have let Caroline off the hook. So I guess all bets and related debates are off, at least until the next bit of account-fiddling comes to light. These politicians never let us down, I’m sure it won’t be more than a week or so…
7th June 2008 at 8:17 pm
Have you read the latest on BBC website.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7442053.stm
7th June 2008 at 8:23 pm
Off the hook with the media, I should stress, who drive these things forward. Not actually innocent of wrongdoing.
7th June 2008 at 10:07 pm
ICM S.TELEGRAPH Con 42 Lab 26 LibDem 21 lead up 2 points to 16
LOL! Nuffsaid
7th June 2008 at 11:39 pm
@bishop Hill: I would suggest that any politician of whichever colour who has been fiddling their expenses and in effect stealing taxpayers’ money (aka my money) deserves everything they get. The fact that they wear a yellow rosette at election time would not make me any more forgiving.
9th June 2008 at 9:41 am
From today’s edition of the Sun, “MEP Sajjad Karim also faces questions after paying his wife Zahida £26,000 a year of taxpayers’ cash.”
I am sure the Conservatives are very pleased to have him on board.
9th June 2008 at 10:33 am
“ICM S.TELEGRAPH Con 42 Lab 26 LibDem 21 lead up 2 points to 16″
Tory share still lower than it was in 1979, 1983 and 1987, and about par with 1992. The Tories need to be doing far better than this two years away from a General Election.
9th June 2008 at 12:53 pm
@Sesenco: that’s only because our (LD) share is so high.