Daily View 2×2: 14 May 2010. “Do or do not. There is no try.”

Welcome to the Daily View for May 14. Happy 66th birthday to George Lucas, creator of the Star Wars movies.

“Do or Do not. There is no try” video also available on YouTube.

Perhaps Lynne Featherstone had this in mind this morning when she wrote Doing – not saying! Congratulations, Lynne, on your appointment as Under Secretary of State for Equalities.

Do or do not? – 2 Must-Read Blog Posts

What are other Liberal Democrat bloggers saying? Here are two posts that caught my eye from the Liberal Democrat Blogs aggregator:

  • We have to make this work
  • From Cllr Steve Guy’s blog, “The Sandals are Off”:

    To be a Lib Dem who doesn’t agree with the new politics is to fundamentally have misunderstood what being a Lib Dem means. Central to our manifesto in every year of our existence has been our commitment for fair votes (proportional representation). If you believe in PR, then by definition, you believe that the old two party seesaw was bad.

  • Why I am leaving the Liberal Democrats…
  • by Jane Watkinson:

    I do leave the Liberal Democrats still fully supporting what they stand for. Unfortunately, I think we have compromised too many of our central beliefs in a bid for power. I know many of you agree with the coalition, and it has become apparent that it is best I leave instead of trying to argue my case within.

Spotted any other great posts in the last day from blogs that aren’t on the aggregator? Do post up a comment sharing them with us all.

Doing and trying – 2 Big Stories

Treasury targets middle-class child benefits in spending cut plans. [Guardian]. The Conservative – Liberal Democrat coalition gets down to business.

Miliband versus Miliband [Sun]
Labour’s search for a new leader begins – another coalition in the making?

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Daily View.
Advert

One Comment

  • Tony Greaves 14th May '10 - 2:58pm

    I don’t know Jane Watkinson but I am disappointed with anyone who says they will not argue their case from within. But the question I ask is: which other party supports a third of what the Liberal Democrats stand for?

    Life is a million compromises so why should politics be different? The important thing is not to lose our principles.

    Tony Greaves

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 25th Jun - 12:09am
    @ Laurence Cox I think you have missed my point. Having 71,111 electors per MP is a major factor in the failure of our representative...
  • User AvatarGlenn 24th Jun - 11:42pm
    Simon, Corbyn does not have special powers off persuasion. He's the hypnotoad from Futurama
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th Jun - 11:34pm
    @ Bill le Breton “EEA membership was not alas on the ballot paper – had it been so, then, it would have won.” This is...
  • User AvatarBernard Salmon 24th Jun - 11:24pm
    @Genersis The reason that the idea of having as many policies as possible against immigration to achieve 'success' seems antithetical to liberal values is because...
  • User AvatarGlenn 24th Jun - 11:23pm
    The sky has not fallen in and free movement etc has only been in place since the early 2000s really. If you were a student...
  • User AvatarLaurence Cox 24th Jun - 11:21pm
    @Michael BG :1300 MPs is far too many; the House of Lords is 800-900 and even that is too large. If we have around 600...