David Cameron is Clegg-lite

Did you notice the almost audible gulping and stuttering from the chattering Tory websites after Ming Campbell’s sudden resignation when it was obvious that Nick Clegg would stand for the leadership? Not to mention their deeply unusual restraint since the leadership election results were announced.

I have a theory about all this and I think it deserves examination.

First of all, let us go back a couple of years.

David Cameron wins their leadership election but – for all his elan in the famous conference speech – Cameron, with his Eton/CCHQ/PR/Hooray Henry background is a recipe for not only ‘more of the same’ but more of the same with spades on for the doomed Tory leadership.

So what should their policy wonks do? Maybe they should look across the parties for a role model for their Dave. Look for someone else who is forty-ish, public school educated, has undoubted charisma and who has the strength to stand up for his principles.

I bet you that this is what the Tories did (and let’s face it it’s what they had to do) and that their fickle finger of fate landed on Nick Clegg as a Tory wet dream of someone who they found attractive and a potential role model but who was outside their mold.

Could they have looked at Nick and thought about what he would be doing? Did they think of him as they went through their cringe-making ‘hoodie’ phase. Did they think of Nick Clegg as Dave made it with the huskies and then made his extraordinary conversion to the environment (now seemingly more or less abandoned).

I believe that when they went through their Nick Clegg copycat phase, they forgot that they all joined the Tory party. The greedy Tory party who, no matter what their CCHQ do to try to stimulate their brain cells, only come to life when they are promised relief on death taxes.

The Tories’ current silence is intriguing – and it is possible that we owe to Ming Campbell a debt even larger than we thought. That by his sudden and decisive resignation, he delivered into the current political scene a leader who Tory HQ had chosen a template for their own leader – but who their party membership would never, ever allow.

The Tory Leader is Clegg-lite and I hope that some of his knee-jerk policies will be exposed to some very energetic Liberal Democrat scrutiny in 2008.

Mary Rose Gliksten is a member of Windsor Liberal Democrats.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1897 for Twitter and emails.


  • lib dem councillor in manchester defects to Cameron lite:))

  • Derek Young 2nd Jan '08 - 4:49pm

    I have to agree with Gavin (and the Whiskey Priest blog his post links to). Why are we concentrating on what the Tories think? There are only 190-odd Tory seats, and there are likely to be more, not fewer, after the next election. Conclusion: trying to win over Tory voters is bizarre in most of the country, though perhaps not in Windsor – in Scotland there’s only 1 Tory MP out of 59. By contrast, there are 360-odd Labour MPs, including 40 in Scotland, several of whom were looking over their shoulder at Lib Dem challengers. They are likely to be feeling much more relaxed the more we talk about Cameron, and now that we have a leader who is constantly being compared to him, whether by Lib Dem bloggers or by the general media.

  • Hywel Morgan 2nd Jan '08 - 5:59pm

    “Labour seat” is sometimes a bit of a misnomer. Many of the seats we won in 2005 had been target seats from the Tories in 1997.

    I think all of the 2005 gains were either Tory or Lib Dem held at some point in the recent-ish past.

  • “So what should their policy wonks do? Maybe they should look across the parties for a role model for their Dave. Look for someone else who is forty-ish, public school educated, has undoubted charisma and who has the strength to stand up for his principles.”

    Exactly right, but their chosen man was Tony Blair.

  • The Lib Dems are always accused of looking inward. Nothing changes. What a load of self obessessed tosh.
    Gavin Whenman is at least engaging in the real world. Unless others do, we are in trouble

  • Sean Hilhorst 3rd Jan '08 - 4:38pm

    I urge Nick Clegg as a new and visionary leader of the third party in Britain to follow in Ming’s footsteps and stride onto the international stage with a new agenda that promotes peace not war. The Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is clearly unable to fulfill this role. Will Nick attend or show his support for our “Disarmament and Globalisation” conference at SOAS on Monday 7th Jan. Read Freedland in the Guardian yesterday, on Gordon’s role in 2008. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,,2234009,00.html

  • The Mary Rose is a national treasure which could soon be lost.

    That is the stark warning from the team that helped to raise the political warhorse 25 years ago.

    Admiral Sir Crufton Thamescruiser, chief executive of the trust, said the old girls fate will soon once again be in the hands of the electorate of Windsor.

    He said: “If we aren’t successful, the outlook would be very gloomy indeed.

    If there is no voting for her, then at the end of the day there will be no Mary Rose. It is as stark as that.

    “Eventually the Mary Rose will cease to be an attraction, she would have to be disposed of…sold for firewood, who knows?”

    Political archaeologist Dr Doomand Gloom helped to raise the artifact and he has devoted most of his working life to the Mary Rose.

    He said: “If we had to stop showing her to the public, it would negate everything we did 25 years ago.

    Mary Rose is 437

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDuncan Brack 18th Apr - 11:46pm
    David White - you are right about Beveridge (except that 1945 couldn't be called a khaki election - unlike 1900, for which the term is...
  • User Avatarmalc 18th Apr - 10:51pm
    Mark Valladares Sorry I shouldn't have said military bases, but we do - or may be did until recently, not sure after defence cuts -...
  • User AvatarBill le Breton 18th Apr - 10:24pm
    But what be the biggest shift for a Governing Party over a period of 13 months? Try December 81 to Jan 83. If potential turn...
  • User AvatarEd Wilson 18th Apr - 10:12pm
    Let's try again. "...power 4 million homes..." means onshore wind produces a number of kilowatt hours which, when divided by the notional power consumption of...
  • User AvatarRoland 18th Apr - 9:56pm
    A scary thought has just occurred - the Pensions Minister either doesn't actually know or want us to know, just how much pension tax relief...
  • User AvatarRoland 18th Apr - 9:46pm
    Ed Davey's defense of on-shore wind is totally undermined by the hard data coming out of NETA... Whilst there might be sufficient capacity to provide...