David Lammy and Quentin Davies provoke warning from Treasury over ministerial behaviour

Rapid criticism of Public Accounts Committee reports from Quentin Davies (defence minister) and David Lammy (higher education minister) have resulted in the Treasury issuing a memo warning that such behaviour can result in ministers being censured.

As the November edition of Public Servant reports:

An attack by two ministers on parliamentary reports revealing waste and incompetence in their departments has provoked the Treasury to warn that ministers will face public censure if they make immediate statements to the media on future reports.

Statements by defence minister Quentin Davies and higher education minister David Lammy have led to a new Whitehall member to accounting officers banning attacks on Public Accounts Committee (PAC) reports before the Treasury can make a considered response.

In other words: don’t rush to the media saying PAC reports are rubbish before the Treasury has even had time to work out a proper analysis of their reports.

It’s not just when presented with new information though that David Lammy’s actions are suspect. It’s often forgotten that Baby Peter was a constituent of his (rather than of Lynne Featherstone’s) given how quiet he has been about both the tragedy itself and the chaotic and flawed management within Haringey’s social services department that inspections have uncovered. As I wrote in December:

David Lammy was warned by a whistle blower of severe problems in Haringey six months before Baby P’s death. Yet as Paul Waugh pointed out in the Evening StandardDavid Lammy was happy to defend Sharon Shoesmith and Haringey Council even after this warning and after Baby P’s death.

And the least said about David Lammy’s Celebrity Mastermind appearance the better… All in all, David Lammy seems to be accumulating a rather unfortunate record as an MP even if he’s managed to escape the expenses scandal by virtue of being several years early with his second home claims.

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Opposition watch.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/16639 for Twitter and emails.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Do you agree to the T&Cs?


Recent Comments

  • User Avatarjason 18th May - 6:40pm
    Christian De Feo18th May '12 - 10:20am........................@Jason I disagree. Saying you don’t have a plan in place creates a panic of its own...................... Double bluff!...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 18th May - 6:13pm
    @AlexSabine: '... as Paul says in his article, all schools funding comes from the Treasury anyway.' Except that under the maintained system, there is local...
  • User AvatarAdam Smith Fan 18th May - 6:07pm
    Roland, those are reasonable points. The current situation with housing benefit, etc is indeed complex and would need to be taken account of so that...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 18th May - 5:57pm
    @Joe. There my be other solutions. You are nice person, I am afraid I am a nasty one. One nasty solution could be to crash...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 18th May - 5:24pm
    Roland, Firstly, before we had council tax and its predecessor the community charge - we had rates . Relief was always available for lower income...