Mark Pack

Do the Conservatives want to exempt MPs from Freedom of Information rules after all?

By | Thu 23rd August 2007 - 12:00 am

You may recall the fuss over attempts by Conservative and Labour MPs to exempt MPs from the Freedom of Information Act. This would have allowed all sorts of things to be kept secret in future, but the supporters of the move claimed it was necessary to protect correspondence with constituents.

Now, one of the arguments (rightly) used against this was that the Data Protection Act protects constituents’ correspondence, so there was no need to exempt MPs from the Freedom of Information rules.

So, over to the Conservative Party, August 2007 policy proposals vintage. Their latest policy review group proposes scrapping the Data Protection Act (well, that’s one of their views, though they flip flop an awful lot within the document). So what would happen to correspondence with constituents?

Four options:

  1. The Conservatives really want private details in correspondence between MPs and constituents to be available to all and sundry (boo! hiss!).
  2. The Conservatives would actually resurrect the idea of exempting all MPs from the Freedom of Information Act (boo! hiss!).
  3. The Conservatives would scrap the act, but then straight away introduce new rules to deal with the mess they’ve created, so they aren’t really cutting regulation after all (surely not!).
  4. The Conservatives haven’t really got a clue what they’re doing (surely not!).
Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Stuart 23rd Aug '07 - 9:53am

    Well spotted. I suspected that it’s cock-up rather than conspiracy. I’d go with option 4 myself. Hywel’s arse & elbow illustration applies again.

  • Cheltenham Robin 24th Aug '07 - 4:04pm

    Is the answer 1234?

    It usually is.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    Tristan, You're right in the sense that you didn't specifically call for PFI. But you did say "if you can persuade private money to provide the funding on t...
  • David Garlick
    Touted as bringing power to people. Power brought down from Govt sounds good but power still not reaching the lowest possible levels in our Communities....
  • Tristan Ward
    @ David Allen "PFI won’t help stop the planet burning" Who said anything about PFI - I didn't. The private money that is building (not enough) house...
  • Joey Vimsante
    I think the EU and UK needs to support not for profit, social media platforms that put the interest of the public, vulnerable people, young people, and nation a...
  • Nick Baird
    With regard to client-side image scanning, the danger of mission creep are real, but I have other concerns. One is whether this is truly a practical and effecti...