A computer stolen from Hazel Blears’s constituency office has turned out to contain sensitive government information on defence and extremism. As the BBC reports, it isn’t yet clear if this means Hazel Blears broke any rules on the handling of government information, but given the rules against holding such information on personal computers, for example, it is hard to see how the data could have ended up on the computer without someone breaking some rules.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Why Britain should be wary of Andy Burnham’s Devolution Revolution (Iain Donaldson)
-
“Build, baby, build” but don’t lower our ambitions on affordability (Victor Chamberlain)
-
Twenty-six years of evidence on drugs. Twenty-six years of cowardice. (Tanya Park)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Gaza (Tom Arms)
-
A shocking abuse of the legal system where the rich try to bully the weak and poor into submission
-
The Joy of Six 1540
-
Are we doing enough to insure against climate change?
-
Don't mention the Isle of Wight Separatists' 1950s terror campaign
-
Fergus McClelland was the last illegal major British child actor
-
Labour and the Liberals in 1924 and today
-
Family: Scene Through the Eye of a Lens
-
Brexit: The Uncivil War - the TV drama with Benedict Cumberbatch
-
A power vacuum?
Recent Comments
Paul Holmes
AlexB - Housing Associations already have the power to borrow money against their assets, which are of course not subject to the wholesale Right to Buy (at huge...
David McHardy
There is no way out of the housing crisis without mass private building. Private building has stalled because it is unprofitable, as this article explains. This...
George Thomas
"Of course, devolution cannot simply mean moving responsibilities without resources. Local leaders need meaningful fiscal powers, long-term funding settlements ...- George Thomas
Greater devolution without greater funding is a poisoned chalice and that is what's being offered in Wales. That and sly digs at the Senedd. Then it leads t... 
William Wallace
I think I became a Liberal from listening to sermons of the social gospel when I was a choirboy. But the social gospel of the New Testament is a very long way ...
6 Comments
The translation of the “departmental spokesman”‘s remaks is simple. The computer contained “Confidential” and “Restricted” documents which should not have been there.
It also contained some indisceet material that was not classified.
I am unable to offer a translation of what the departmental spokesman carefully did not say.
When she was a Home Office Minister, Hazel Blears chaired a working group on Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention, and wrote a preface for the executive summary which the group produced, so she’s well aware of the issues surrounding computer security.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha talk about hoist by her own petard!
* sits back and waits for Fate to take his revenge on her for schadenfreude *
It’ll all be the fault of a junior/ temporary/ casual/ contract/ illegally-present-in-the-UK member of staff, who has since left the employment/ service/ country/ planet, and no further action would be appropriate.
Mark my words.
While Labour MP’s are doing their best to continue an incompetant run of losing sensitive documents, the Tories have still got their snouts in the trough filching expenses:
Latest Tory sleaze here
“Two Tory MPs, Sir Nicholas Winterton and his wife Ann, were in “unequivocal” breach of Parliamentary rules by claiming over £165,000 in rent on a property which they had bought outright, MPs have concluded.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4164118.ece
If he actually sacked all the sleazebags in his party, Cameron wouldn’t have many MP’s or MEP’s left.
The government’s Protective Marking Scheme classifies sensitive documents in four categories according to the damage that would be done if they were improperly disclosed. The categories are (in decreasing level of sensitivity) Top Secret, Secret, Confidential and Restricted.
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/reading_room/topic/~/media/assets/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/foi/classifications%20pdf.ashx
Saying that the computer didn’t have any Secret or Top Secret material on it invites us the infer that it had Confidential material on it. What does that mean? Well the definition of “Confidential” is:
“The compromise of this information or material would be likely: materially to damage diplomatic relations (i.e. cause formal protest or other sanction); to prejudice individual security or liberty; to cause damage to the operational effectiveness or security of UK or allied forces or the effectiveness of valuable security or intelligence operations; to work substantially against national finances or economic and commercial interests; substantially to undermine the financial viability of major organisations; to impede the investigation or facilitate the commission of serious crime; to impede seriously the development or operation of major government policies; to shut down or otherwise substantially disrupt significant national operations.”