On 27th August, LDV will be 10 years old. In that time, we’ve brought you over 24,000 posts and published over 337,000 comments. Over the Summer holidays, we’ll take you on a nostalgic meander through a decade of Liberal Democrat history, seen through the eyes of our editors and contributors. We hope you enjoy our choices.
Let’s go back to 2008 and the start of the global crash.
Here is what Vince Cable had to say. It’s relevant because it shows our consistency of approach to these things over the years and that we were well ahead of the game in predicting the dangers of the accumulation of personal debt.
Gordon Brown’s response to the economic crisis has been too little, too late.
For years I warned him of the oncoming economic problems. Unsustainable levels of personal debt, mostly secured against the illusory ‘wealth’ of rising, vastly inflated property prices. An economy based so heavily on debt was never going to be in a fit state to deal with global shocks like the credit crunch.
And so it has proved. Gordon Brown is now facing the consequences of his years of inaction. The housing bubble has burst. Unemployment is rising fast. Tens of thousands of families are losing their homes.
With people struggling with massive debts and fast rising bills it is now almost inevitable that the UK is heading for recession. Gordon Brown used to boast we were better prepared than our competitors for a downturn. Yet the OECD’s respected economic forecasters now predict we will fare worst among the world’s seven leading economies (G7) in the current crisis.
What Britain needs now, and urgently, is practical action to help people who are struggling – to put money back in their pockets, to cut their energy bills, and help them keep their homes.
Gordon Brown and Labour can’t offer that. They got us into this mess. Now they are veering between complacency and panic. Dithering on key decisions, muddling along on half measures.
David Cameron and the Conservatives won’t offer it. At a time when those on the breadline are struggling more than for a generation, their top priority is tax cuts for millionaires.
It’s not good enough to just keep muddling along and hoping.
We need a serious plan to get Britain’s economy up and running again.
That is why Nick Clegg and I have put together the Liberal Democrat Fairer Future Economic Recovery Plan.
Our plan would:
- Put more money in people’s pockets – tax cuts for people on low and middle incomes,
- Stop unnecessary home repossessions and provide more affordable housing,
- Make energy companies reinvest their windfall profits in cutting bills, and
- Deliver extra help for people in debt or who lose their jobs.
And we will bring the free-wheeling, ‘anything goes’ short-termism of the City to an end. We cannot continue with a culture where bankers pocket big bonuses for taking reckless risks, but when things go wrong government and taxpayers have to step in to pick up the pieces.
Please read the summary of the plan, and share it with other people you know.
There is only one party in Britain today with a serious and credible plan to get Britain’s economy back on its feet – and to provide real help to those struggling in the meantime.
That is the Liberal Democrats.
If you want to be part of the next decade on LDV, write for us!



6 Comments
We still have “Unsustainable levels of personal debt, mostly secured against the illusory ‘wealth’ of rising, vastly inflated property prices.”.
It’s great that Vince shares these concerns, but we disagree on the solutions. I’m against the ultra-loose monetary policy consensus currently in operation across the western world. This subsidises debt and penalises saving, but the alternative view is tightening monetary policy (increasing interest rates or quantitative tightening), would crash the economy.
There is an irony that Dr Cable who once warned about high levels of personal debt, went on to be the architect of an education funding system that is saddling England’s young people with high levels of personal debt.
Fortunately, in Scotland where Dr Cable was once a councillor, we have a government that understands the value of education and not just the cost.
Good stuff from Vince 8 years ago but can someone – maybe Vince – tell me why the package proposed then to alleviate the credit crunch did not include a one-off tax on anyone who had worked in the City (the source of so many of our problems) and had earned more than let’s say an average of £250,000 per annum over the previous 5 years. It could have started at 5% and risen to 50% for the really high rollers – £10m and above.
Just remember that Brown did this in 1997 on the energy companies so why not in 2008?
Perhaps Cable might explain how such personal debt would have been stopped?
Worldwide interest rates were at an all-time low…Would he have increased rates for UK borrowers?
The housing bubble hasn’t burst; at most there was a small, temporary leak…..As for unemployment it seems strange that, as part of the post 2010 government he was telling us that ‘there are more people in employment than ever before’….Far fewer householders lost their homes compared to the far less severe financial crisis of 1990-91…
Overall, Vince appears to have got very little right.
Vince Cable was quite right to warn about high levels of private debt prior to the 2008 crash. I haven’t seen him explain, though, that if the UK as a whole runs a trade deficit, then someone in the UK has to fund that deficit by borrowing. That can be a mixture of public and private debt. So is he saying that the public debt should have been correspondingly higher or is he arguing that the trade deficit should have been lower?
Isn’t £9,000 per year per university student going to make personal debt the norm?