Lib Dem councillor reveals Lancashire Town hall uses anti-terror laws to snoop on cleaners

The Mirror reports the news:

Laws designed to fight terrorists and gangsters have been used by a council to spy on its cleaners.

It was revealed yesterday that town hall bosses employed the draconian measures over 500 times, including one occasion to snoop on bus drivers.

Lancashire county council’s tactics were uncovered by Lib Dem Mark Jewell who branded them “an abuse of power.”

Using Freedom of Information, he found out county hall chiefs in Preston ordered surveillance on the cleaners to check if they worked the right hours.

Mr Jewell discovered they frequently used the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act between 2001 and 2008. …

A spokesman said the council had been trying to ensure value on contracts. He added: “We don’t do inquiries for trivial matters.” But Mr Jewell was furious. He said: “It says something when they spy on their own people.” …

Lord Carlile QC, who reviews anti-terror laws, warned yesterday that police who use force or threats to make photographers delete pictures of officers could face prosecution.

Lib Dem Voice has been tracking for some time now the ways in which RIPA laws are being used by authorities to keep tabs on citizens well beyond the intention of the act – you can view the archive of stories here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Big mad database, LDV campaigns and News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/15407 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDaniel Henry 31st Jul - 12:19pm
    I share Bill's view. Whatever challenges we face in terms of housing, inequality, climate change, resources, etc, I think we've been more than compensated with...
  • User AvatarGlenn 31st Jul - 12:18pm
    Anyway, to the various people responding to my most thank you for your time, but we'll have to agree to disagree, I will only add...
  • User AvatarDuncan Stott 31st Jul - 12:17pm
    I'd like it to be held in Latvia/Lithuania/Estonia, just to troll Putin. There was a fledgling "Lib Dem Friends of Football" at one point -...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Jul - 12:13pm
    peter tyzack So it is right that a sanction exists to expel someone, who regardless of their own beliefs or their past work for the...
  • User AvatarMatthew Huntbach 31st Jul - 12:09pm
    Ian Sanderson (RM3) Even when they are touted as ‘efficiency’ reorganisations come with an upfront cost; staff may be entitled to redundancy payments and/or early...
  • User AvatarA Social Liberal 31st Jul - 11:52am
    I apologise My comment above was to Steve