Liberal Democrat Women reacts to Morrissey report

The three acting c0-chairs of Liberal Democrat Women, Dinti Batstone, Tam Langley and Miranda Whitehead have issued a statement on behalf of the organisation giving their reaction to Helena Morrissey’s report on processes and culture within the Liberal Democrats.

We welcome today’s report by Helena Morrissey following her independent inquiry into the processes and culture of our party, and support in full the recommendations she makes for change.

The inquiry was prompted by the sexual harassment allegations against Lord Rennard, although it does not consider the truth or otherwise of the allegations, but rather how they were handled. Morrissey observes that, ‘Overall it is clear that formal processes existed but were not followed, largely due to the sensitive nature of the allegations and the position of the person to whom they were directed’ (page 36).  This is very disappointing to learn, and the report shows some of those involved have since apologised for their failings.

We fully agree with the conclusion that, ‘the addressing of complaints needs to be a higher priority for the Party’. Whilst there is no suggestion of a deliberate cover-up in the report, the picture painted is one of gaping holes in party processes and codes of conduct, and a lack of understanding at most levels of the party of how to respond to complaints.  Her practical recommendations for improving the experience of future complainants, such as a dedicated Pastoral Care Officer and manned phone line are welcome, and must be swiftly acted upon.

Morrissey also remarks on the lack of progress made in improving the gender balance of our MPs, observing that, “There is now both an opportunity and an imperative to improve the experience of women in the Party.” (p53) We welcome her recommendation that the Party raise the priority of diversity training and makes this available to both men and women.  Liberal Democrat Women will take this on board as we plan our training schedule for conference, as we entirely agree that cultural change cannot only be legislated for, it must also be ‘owned’ by all who are involved.  We will follow implementation of her recommendations to see that they are acted upon, just as we are committed to working with the men and women of our party to improve party culture so that it better reflects our values of fairness and equality.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34906 for Twitter and emails.

4 Comments

  • Helen Dudden 13th Jun '13 - 5:51pm

    Will it be a enough to improve with diversity training? The way to handle most women is with respect that they are women, and hopefully can contribute to society.

    In most professional areas women are welcomed, in the area of law they are many, even becoming Judges. I find the need for this article something that takes us back to an age when we had little control of our lives.

  • Eddie Sammon 13th Jun '13 - 6:11pm

    What is diversity training?

    By the way, it is wrong to hire people just because they are female in order to “improve the gender balance”.

    We should just reject all sex discrimination outright.

  • Helen Dudden 14th Jun '13 - 7:46am

    Could the best for the job be a new phrase to use?

    As a woman I rarely have problems with men, and I feel sympathy, for those who have had the problems. It is demeaning to be treated this way.

  • Agree with Helen – outright sexism is very much a minority pursuit!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 2nd Oct - 11:13am
    Yes - Matt, that would be the ideal - however the temptation to make more bizarre suggestions springs from the fact that there seems little...
  • User AvatarJoe Otten 2nd Oct - 11:00am
    Two years ago, I would have understood this article. Today, with the economy growing - more strongly than other major economies, unemployment plummeting, and the...
  • User Avatarmatt 2nd Oct - 10:51am
    It is to late to sack Nick now that will just be seen as pure desperation in the electorates eyes. You can't hide Nick away...
  • User AvatarJennie 2nd Oct - 10:50am
    Frank Booth: in terms of preference perhaps people are judging not solely on how much they agree with a particular person but how competent they...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 2nd Oct - 10:50am
    "But how many Tories would now prefer a coalition with UKIP? Most, by a large majority, I believe" Actualy the BBC asked that very question...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 2nd Oct - 10:48am
    Indeed. Something inside of me dies every time I hear Nick talking about how the Coalition has introduced the family income thing for foreign spouses.