LibLink: Mark Pack – Lib Dems Must Not Ditch Commitment To Political Reform

Over at The Holmes Report website, Lib Dem Voice’s Mark Pack has a piece setting out how the Liberal Democrats should approach the issue of political reform in the wake of the substantial defeat for reformers in the AV referendum. Here’s an extract from Mark’s piece:

It would be a mistake for Liberal Democrats (or indeed reformers in the Conservative Party’s ranks) to conclude from the referendum result that all political reform should now be side-lined. The referendum No vote was not a vote of confidence in our political system. Politicians continue to be one of the least respected professions in Britain.

But particularly for the Liberal Democrats, it would be a mistake to think that the route back to the party’s early 2010 levels of popularity lies in abandoning a long-held party demand. Constitutional reform is not top of the public’s list of priorities – which is why Lib Dem prominence on issues such as the NHS is important – but it’s no secret that it has long been top of the Liberal Democrats’ list of priorities. Giving up on it would not only be controversial with activists, it would trigger a round of media headlines about u-turns, splits, leadership weakness and going back on previous policies.

Nick Clegg told Radio 4 in August last year, “I wouldn’t have stood for the leadership of the Lib Dems if I thought the only sole purpose in life was to change the electoral system”. The repeated enthusiasm with which he made the point at the time – before the AV vote – caused some controversy but the essence of it still applies. Political reform was not the only priority on the front page of the 2010 general election manifesto – but it was there, asone of the set of four.

One of the perks of being in government is that it gives enough media profile to be able to talk about more than one issue – not many more, but more than one.

You can read the whole article here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • It’s the Conservatives and Labour who should be accused of “u-turns, splits, leadership weakness and going back on previous policies” if Lords reform doesn’t happen. As Nick likes to say, this was in all 3 manifestos. It can, however, thankfully stay out of the limelight for the next year during this committee stage.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 23rd Sep - 1:43pm
    This uber ban is crying out for a centrist solution. Increase the regulation, but not an outright ban, especially not a permanent one. 523,000 have...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 23rd Sep - 1:33pm
    Unfortunately Labour's idea of working together is to support them unthinkingly. They view us as Labour mark 2 and simply don't understand that we may...
  • User AvatarJohn Littler 23rd Sep - 1:20pm
    The PPB was very amusing and may have more impact than any for a long time, perhaps since Cleese's. The groundhog day PPB was so...
  • User AvatarPhil Wainewright 23rd Sep - 1:15pm
    If we truly "believe in competitive markets" then every operator must be held accountable to the same rules - and the rules must ensure a...
  • User AvatarNick Thornsby 23rd Sep - 1:02pm
    Good piece Andy, and I agree with Paul Barker above. It is striking how many Lib Dems have supported the decision, on the implicit assumption...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 23rd Sep - 12:25pm
    In this case it feels to me that TFL were acting to protect "their" producers rather than their customers. TFL dont seem neutral in this,...