LibLink: Paul Tyler on target practice

targetIn a recent post on Lord of the Blogs, Paul Tyler asks where the elusive Parliamentary rifle range is to be found.

For some years, while I was still an MP, there were regular requests for this apparently anachronistic  facility, somewhere in the basement, to be replaced with a creche for the children of staff and members of both Houses.  One Conservative MP naughtily suggested that the two roles could be combined.

Some years ago Nick Clegg said that it was absurd that parliament should have a shooting range and not a creche. A creche has now been provided elsewhere, but the rifle range is still a mystery.

A question in the Commons had elicited the information that it was to be found at the Lords end of the Palace, so was their responsibility. This spurred Lord Tyler to ask what the rifle range cost the House of Lords:

The Chairman of Committees (Lord Sewel): No such figures are available. The rifle range uses minimal amounts of lighting, but it is not possible to calculate the particular costs attributable to the rifle range. The House does not incur any other costs in relation to the rifle range, other than in respect of that percentage of general estate costs which is paid for by the House.

Paul Tyler muses:

More mystery.  If this facility costs the taxpayer almost nothing, who runs this outfit?  Who is responsible for the security of the rifles and their ammunition?  Surely selected members are not permitted to wander round the building with them?  Is this not a potential weakness in our otherwise tight security?  And who pays for that security?   I tried phoning the Rifle Range (ext 3350 if you want to know), to get answers to these questions, but it rang without anyone answering.

This is all very unsettling.  If the House authorities are not responsible, who is?  To whom should I target my questions now?

 

* Mary Reid is the Tuesday Editor on Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/32932 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Why is it such a problem if they have a rifle range in Parliament? It’s a popular sport that was seen at the recent Olympics. It’s a particularly good sport for disabled and infirm people. I can’t understand why there is any concern about this.

  • As long as Cameron isn’t thinking of being the first prime minister since the Duke of Wellington to fight a duel. On the other hand…

  • Michael Parsons 31st Jan '13 - 11:07pm

    Unless you have serious concerns as to the mental stabiity of some MP’s who might run amock if the weapons are of semi-military type, it seems nothing but a good idea; and good even so wth safegauards against the more obviously crazy members of the Casbinet. Perhaps you should ask the Speaker to check their access to and the safety of the kit.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPsi 28th Nov - 7:45am
    David-1 "I do not in the least understand why any Liberal Democrat would do anything but oppose the ridiculous fearmongering about immigration and terrorism which...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 28th Nov - 7:28am
    ... and ... if employers employ more "marginal" people who have fewer skills than the people they replace, then either the quality of the products...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 28th Nov - 7:00am
    On the other hand, there will be 3.2 million fewer users of the infrastructure, so there will be less degradation due to use and so...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 28th Nov - 6:46am
    @Amalric I don't think your calculations are correct. If there were 3.2 million fewer people, there would also be 3.2 million fewer customers with money...
  • User AvatarJulian Tisi 28th Nov - 6:38am
    @ Helen Tedcastle, John Tilley Thanks for that. I had no idea about Vincent Nichols' visit to Gaza. Likewise re the Pope's visit to the...
  • User AvatarAmalric 28th Nov - 3:09am
    @ Richard Dean Thank you for pointing out my error - 260,000 is for 12 months not 6 (I seem to be making quite a...