Lynne Featherstone MP writes…A great leap backwards for gay rights

Uganda’s new anti-homosexuality legislation is abhorrent. It imposes draconian penalties for repeat offences of homosexuality, so-called ‘aggravated’ homosexuality, same-sex marriage, attempting to commit homosexuality and for the loosely defined ‘promotion’ of homosexuality. This is nothing short of a great leap backward – not just for Uganda but for gay rights across Africa. I believe it marks a growing state-backed homophobic trend across the continent, one we cannot and should not ignore.

From Day 1 in my role as Africa minister at the Department for International Development (DFID), strengthening the department’s LGBT rights strategy has been one of my top priorities. I instructed every DFID country office in Africa to report back to me with details of their respective LGBT rights strategies, with proposals for doing more. The approach DFID has taken has been led by local gay campaigners in each country and, up until recently, they have asked that we take a subtle approach, raising our concerns only in private with their respective politicians. So, respecting their wishes, that is what I have done in African counties I’ve visited – raised my concerns behind closed doors with the Governments and privately met with local LGBT groups.

But this approach clearly didn’t work in Uganda. It failed to prevent new anti-gay legislation, and I fear it won’t deter similar legislation in other parts of Africa.

I will continue to do everything in my power to promote gay rights and equality – both at home and abroad. I’ve also invited Stonewall and the Kaleidoscope Trust to meet with me early next week to discuss how they and their international networks can help. We need to work closely together, jointly where possible, in defending and promoting human rights everywhere.

Because that is what this debate is about – not Western imperialism or Western impositions on African cultures, but the universal values of tolerance, love and mutual respect.

* Lynne Featherstone is a minister at the Home Office and blogs at www.lynnefeatherstone.org.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/38379 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

5 Comments

  • I cannot agree more. Too long have we let ourselves get boxed into the position of treating LGBT rights as if it were somehow a special case, something strange and exotic that foreigners just wouldn’t understand. We’ve been so busy apologising to crooks and tyrants for fear of seeming “imperialistic” that we’ve lost sight of the millions of individuals who have been and will be tormented and crucified for the crime of being born the way they are. Politicians must understand that these are not special ‘Western’ values, and that we can no more tolerate repression against LGBT people than we tolerate repression against people because of their race. The same remedies should be sought against Uganda and countries with like laws as were sought against Rhodesia and apartheid-era South Africa — they should be treated as pariah states and sanctioned for it. How politicians and countries respond to this will reveal a great deal about whether they give anything more than lip service to human rights.

  • Stuart Mitchell 28th Feb '14 - 6:49pm

    “The same remedies should be sought against Uganda and countries with like laws as were sought against Rhodesia and apartheid-era South Africa — they should be treated as pariah states and sanctioned for it.”

    I’d agree with that. But sadly, such countries are more likely to be treated in the same way as those countries which have long practised gender-based discrimination i.e. allowed to get away with it. I never understood why we didn’t treat, say, Saudi Arabia the same way we treated South Africa.

  • I agree with Stuart. There’s no place in the 21st century for denying women the vote and other basic rights. Of course, the real reason Saudi Arabia gets away with these and other abuses is its control over world oil. Politicians are not sufficiently idealistic to do something on principle when they know the opposition and voters will punish them severely for an inevitable jump in petrol prices.

  • Andrew Colman 1st Mar '14 - 7:43am

    I don’t think the Ugandan people or government should be blamed for this, Religious facists from America have been stirring up hate see http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/24/how-american-evangelicals-may-be-responsible-for-ugandas-anti-gay-law/. Uganda is a lovely people and a government keen on protecting its environment and R&D
    The religous facists spreading hate about homosexuals are not Christians, they are terrorists..

  • What about the LGBT campaign in Uganda was subtle? From the very visible protests by activists throughout the Western world the to the very public, very loud condemnation of the bill (now law) from Western leaders like Cameron and Obama, this was arguably the ONE human rights issue that the West actually spoke up publicly about. What other human rights issue has the UK threatened to cut aid over? In short, where’s the evidence of this subtly?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarNick Collins 28th Jan - 2:06pm
    Will you be issuing your canvassers and candidates with tee-shirts bearing the words "I'm not yet dead"? If you contact those nice people who produced...
  • User AvatarAlex Sabine 28th Jan - 2:03pm
    Malcolm: If it's not happening then it would perhaps be fair to characterise this initiative as gesture politics. It sounds like it is a rarity...
  • User AvatarChrisB 28th Jan - 2:02pm
    Instead of a death, it might be more productive to see this as a rebirth. Things have clearly gone wrong, the party has lost its...
  • User AvatarGreenfield 28th Jan - 1:59pm
    Stop this now! STV - nothing else will do. And DO NOT make PR a condition of any agreement............. especially a referendum - the majority...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 28th Jan - 1:59pm
    @ Matthew Huntbach Yes - a new party does seem the answer if NC manages to retain the leadership after the GE - although that...
  • User AvatarTony Greaves 28th Jan - 1:58pm
    Nonsense. The job of a radical party is to set out what we want and campaign for it. Leave any compromises to the day. STV...