Opinion: Blue Skies Thinking

There is a section in Douglas Adams’ great work Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, where the residents of earth decide they have had enough of consultants, public relations men, telephone sanitizers and other non-productive sorts. They send them out into space in a specially selected spacecraft for VIPs, claiming the planet is about to be consumed by a huge, inter-galactic goat.

My pre-dilection is to fill the craft with London think tanks (with a few honourable reprieves). Why?

Because they are collectively responsible for the sheer absence of radical thinking in British politics, the explanation of why party manifestos, rhetoric and vocabulary sound increasingly and depressingly the same. Scarcely a week goes by without some or other party leader sounding off in their midst with negligible political effect. Collectively they are responsible for a dearth of genuinely new ideas.

The explanation is relatively simple. Karl Marx claimed “Social being determines consciousness,” and if we examine the denizens of ‘think-tank world’ we will find people of astonishingly similar backgrounds, experiences and education who unsurprisingly come up with astonishingly similar views of the world and its problems.

There is ample scope for some ‘Sociology of Knowledge’ here. Ought we not to be surprised if prominent members of Centre Forum cosy up to Liberal Democrat leaders one day and Labour Prime Ministers the next?

Ought it not to concern us that party leaders’ speeches all contain the tellingly limp line, “Yes, I know our political opponents also say X (fill in blank), but they don’t mean it quite like we do”? Ought we not to start building that spaceship?

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/2878 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

17 Comments

  • If you don’t like the ideas that thinktanks are coming up with, then rather than pointlessly trying to prevent them from thinking, maybe you should come up with some ideas of your own

  • This article is aimed at me as much as anyone – I am an academic, and on the advisory board of both Centre Forum and Policy Exchange.

    This week I published a column in Inside Housing, a longer version of which is to be published by Centre Forum. I argue that we should allow social housing tenants the right to sell the property they live in, and use the money to buy another one that they like (which would then be owned by the social landlord, who is essentially unaffected). In this way social tenants would have greater freedom. Now we can debate the merits of this idea, but I think it daft to claim that it is unoriginal.

    My challenge to John is simple: demonstrate that I am unoriginal and should be put in your spaceship by telling me where have you seen this particular idea before.

  • Jock: the former. They would sell something that they do not own, and use the money to buy something to replace it. Future affordability is not affected. As you say, and as I hope John will agree, it is novel. It reduces state control over the lives of people who are poor, without costing others anything. That sounds good to me! If you send me your email, I will send you a copy. I am not opposed to your idea, which could be used concurrently. Indeed, under my scheme, if they want to buy somewhere more expensive, they can, and it would then be shared equity.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 28th May - 4:32pm
    If people have the opportunity to elect their representatives than that is democracy. It does not matter if only one person wished to stand the...
  • User Avatardavespod 28th May - 4:31pm
    @Neale Upstone If it is an liberal economics you want, Tim Farron is probably not your man. He is generally considered on the left-ish wing...
  • User AvatarDavid-1 28th May - 4:22pm
    I am reminded of the claims made for the excellence of the system of rotten boroughs prior to the Reform Bill. According to the Duke...
  • User AvatarGordon 28th May - 4:19pm
    David Allen - Nicely put. And I totally agree with your last point. The Lib Dems simply aren't fit for purpose as currently organised and...
  • User Avatarpaul barker 28th May - 4:11pm
    We are in a strange twilight zone at the moment, its the start of the "silly season" & everyone interested in Politics is in recovery...
  • User AvatarToby Keynes 28th May - 4:02pm
    I'm encouraged that all 5 of our LibDem MSPs took part, and the majority were in support of the bill. Jim Hume, Liam McArthur and...
Thu 28th May 2015
Fri 29th May 2015
19:30
Sat 30th May 2015
Sun 31st May 2015
Mon 1st Jun 2015
Tue 2nd Jun 2015
Wed 3rd Jun 2015
Thu 4th Jun 2015
Fri 5th Jun 2015
Sat 6th Jun 2015
Mon 8th Jun 2015
19:30
Tue 9th Jun 2015
Wed 10th Jun 2015
Thu 11th Jun 2015
Fri 12th Jun 2015
Sat 13th Jun 2015
Wed 17th Jun 2015
Thu 18th Jun 2015
Sat 20th Jun 2015
Sun 21st Jun 2015
Thu 25th Jun 2015