PMQs: Vince tackles Gordon on Treasury disasters

Acting Lib Dem leader Vince Cable today took Gordon Brown to task – and after this week’s Government shambles he had plenty of choice of subject matter.

Cunningly Vince rolled up both Northern Rock and the HRMC’s lost data into his first question; though trying to stir up the Blair/Brown row allowed Gordon easily to deflect Vince’s point. For his second question, Vince moved on to QinetiQ, raising a valid concern about another instance of Labour’s financial incompetence; but this wasn’t the issue uppermost in people’s mind today.

(And, yes, yet again Gordon referred in his reply to ‘the Liberal party’ rather than the Liberal Democrats. I guess he must think we’ll be insulted or wound up by it; personally, I just find it bemusing. Does he really think it will make him sound more Prime Ministerial if he can’t get right the name of this country’s third largest political party?)

Full PMQs transcript of the Vince-Gordon exchanges below (via Hansard):

Dr. Vincent Cable (Twickenham) (LD): After the twin disasters of £25 billion of taxpayers’ money disappearing down the black hole of Northern Rock and 25 million personal records disappearing in the post, does the Prime Minister accept the wisdom of Tony Blair who said that the Treasury had become far too powerful under its previous incumbent, was no longer fit for purpose and should have been broken up?

The Prime Minister: This is a new policy from the Liberal party today. I do not know whether the new leader of the Liberal party will want to stick with the policy to break up the Treasury. If the hon. Gentleman seriously believes, as he implies, that we should not be helping Northern Rock depositors and savers, if he seriously believes that we should let Northern Rock mortgage holders go under, then I do not believe he has support in any part of the country. We have taken the right decision—initially supported, of course, by the Leader of the Opposition, who has since backed away from it—to give liquidity to Northern Rock. I hope that the hon. Member for Twickenham (Dr. Cable) will continue to support that position.

Dr. Cable: May I point the Prime Minister to the next Treasury disaster, with the imminent publication of the report on the privatisation of QinetiQ, which I warned about in the debate 18 months ago? Was the Prime Minister not financially very naive when he agreed to the undervaluation of public assets, enabling an American private equity company to make a windfall profit of £300 million and the chief civil servant involved to make a personal fortune of £22 million?

The Prime Minister: It is very interesting that the hon. Gentleman has not moved to talk about Northern Rock again. I suppose that he is now supporting us in rescuing Northern Rock. I hope that that is a consensus. As far as QinetiQ is concerned, we raised £800 million from the sale. QinetiQ is serving its country under its new ownership and QinetiQ is very important to the Ministry of Defence’s future procurement plans.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and PMQs.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/1664 for Twitter and emails.

5 Comments

  • Vote for Vince in Sky ‘PMQs: Which leader performed the best?’ poll.

    http://news.sky.com/skynews/politics

  • Martin Land 21st Nov '07 - 8:10pm

    Maybe we should stop refering to the Labour Party and start calling them the ‘Labour Representation Committee’?

  • dominic hannigan 21st Nov '07 - 8:23pm

    Can you believe that according to Channel four news. “Any of the 25m people have the potential to sue the Chancellor and the department under data protection laws!”

    Now that will be an interesting test case!

  • dominic hannigan 21st Nov '07 - 10:35pm

    What a great idea. Someone should try it out.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Do you agree to the T&Cs?


Recent Comments

  • User Avatarjason 18th May - 6:40pm
    Christian De Feo18th May '12 - 10:20am........................@Jason I disagree. Saying you don’t have a plan in place creates a panic of its own...................... Double bluff!...
  • User AvatarHelen Tedcastle 18th May - 6:13pm
    @AlexSabine: '... as Paul says in his article, all schools funding comes from the Treasury anyway.' Except that under the maintained system, there is local...
  • User AvatarAdam Smith Fan 18th May - 6:07pm
    Roland, those are reasonable points. The current situation with housing benefit, etc is indeed complex and would need to be taken account of so that...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 18th May - 5:57pm
    @Joe. There my be other solutions. You are nice person, I am afraid I am a nasty one. One nasty solution could be to crash...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 18th May - 5:24pm
    Roland, Firstly, before we had council tax and its predecessor the community charge - we had rates . Relief was always available for lower income...