Same sex marriage bill: how peers voted by party

We reported last night the historic decision of the House of Lords to approve the second reading of the Same Sex Marriage Bill by a hefty majority. 73 Lib Dem peers voted against Lord Dear’s wrecking amendment.

And if you were wondering about the breakdown across the parties — how many of each voted for or against? — then Will Howells (formerly of this parish) has posted this handy graph to Twitter:

equal marriage votes

Figures are from Public Whip, with one or two errors as noted here by Will.

* Stephen Tall is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice, and editor of the 2013 publication, The Coalition and Beyond: Liberal Reforms for the Decade Ahead. He is also a Research Associate for the liberal think-tank CentreForum and writes at his own site, The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Parliament.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/34808 for Twitter and emails.

3 Comments

  • Richard Church 6th Jun '13 - 12:37pm

    So the bishops party join with UKIP,UUP and DUP in their 100% opposition to gay marriage, and in their willingness to undermine the clear wish of the democratic part of parliament.

  • David Evans 6th Jun '13 - 3:30pm

    Or perhaps as a Liberal as well as a Democrat, you could say that they apply different weightings to certain values than other members of the Church family.

  • Roger Roberts/Wales 8th Jun '13 - 12:56am

    There are TWO plaid Cymru members – Wigley and Elis-Thomas. Both supported Equal Marriage.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read




Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Dean 23rd Oct - 9:32am
    The "central point" of this article has been challenged by a number of commentators, so I don't see why Rabi should complain that it hasn't....
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:29am
    When we review the party constitution next year (first I heard of it, maybe because I was entitled to go to Glasgow and vote, but...
  • User Avatarrobert sayer 23rd Oct - 9:26am
    John Dunn. ignores the outlandish and brazen misinformation expressed by some in his party(including its leader) and attempts to sanitize it But as I said...
  • User AvatarRichard Fagence 23rd Oct - 9:21am
    I usually agree with the remarks made by Helen Tadcastle but, on this occasion, I'm afraid we have to disagree. I shall be casting my...
  • User AvatarSIMON BANKS 23rd Oct - 9:18am
    There are some important perceptions here, and I speak as someone who was out in the constituency most days. What we need to do, though,...
  • User AvatarJohn Kelly 23rd Oct - 9:01am
    What's the date of the conference and where is it being held?