Conservative MP uses Parliamentary expenses to promote by-election candidate
Written by Mark Pack on 13th May 2008 – 4:12 pmTrouble brewing for Conservative MP Stephen O’Brien, who has been promoting Edward Timpson - Conservative candidate in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election - on his website. The problem? The website is paid for by the Parliamentary funds. And that’d be funds for which the rules expressly forbid such campaigning. Tsk tsk.
A formal complaint has now been lodged with the Director of Finance and Administration of the House of Commons by Gwyn Griffiths, one of the local Liberal Democrat councillors. The key part of his complaint says:
On his website Conservative MP Stephen O’Brien promotes Edward Timpson, the Conservative candidate for Crewe and Nantwich, Stephen Mosley, Conservative candidate for Chester and Graham Evans, Conservative candidate for Weaver Vale.
He also uses the site to promote the policies and advance the cause of the Conservative Party in breach of the explicit rules laid down by the House.
Paragraph Seven of the ‘Rules and guidance on Members’ Websites funded from the Communications Allowance’ clearly states that it must not be used to fund party political activity or campaigning.
7. You must not use your website:
to campaign on behalf of or against any person seeking election
to advance perspectives or arguments with the intention of promoting the interests of any person, political party or organisation you support, or damaging the interests of any other such person, party or organisation.On his website, Mr O’Brien states that it is paid for out of his parliamentary allowances.
Please launch an investigation into Mr O’Brien’s use of his Incidental Expenses Provision and Communications Allowance to promote the Conservative Party and their candidates.
Meanwhile, happy news from Tim Farron MP, who has been out meeting farmers and getting a very warm response for Elizabeth Shenton:
Posted in Crewe and Nantwich, Lib Dem TV
13th May 2008 at 4:54 pm
It rather depends whether the website is paid for out of the communications allowance … rather than out of other Parliamentary allowances; doesn’t it?
13th May 2008 at 5:02 pm
And I can’t see a reference to Timpson, maybe I am going mad
13th May 2008 at 5:03 pm
Evan’s right to a point. It’d have to be his own pay to legitimately campaign with? But anyway this is hilariously hypocritical considering Lib Dem sehenigans.
13th May 2008 at 5:16 pm
The website says that it is being paid out of the ‘Incidental Expenses Provision’ and the rules in the Green Book permit websites to be maintained, but limit the use so that it is not permitted to use the funds for ‘party political matters’ - see here: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/HofCpsap.pdf for the Green Book and go to page 18.
I have to say that I have looked at the website and have found it difficult to find the matters complained about.
13th May 2008 at 8:52 pm
That’s because they were whipped off there as soon as the complaint surfaced
14th May 2008 at 7:47 pm
Er, this website contains lots of little adverts asking people to vote for Elizabeth Shenton on May 22. Are the costs of upkeep of this site going on her expenses? Why do I think not?