The Voice

The 12 most-read LDV posts of 2014 (Day 7)

By | Wed 31st December 2014 - 2:45 pm

Throughout the 12 days of Christmas, we’re bringing you the 12 most-read posts on this site of 2014. Here’s today’s offering…

Ukip examined: who they are, what they stand for, and what it all means for British politics – Stephen Tall | Mon 28th April 2014

There is one off-note in Revolt on the Right. Ford and Goodwin dismiss the 1980s’ insurgence of the ‘radical centre’ when the SDP, albeit briefly, looked poised to win the popular vote: “in the end the SDP fell flat, barely denting the mould on the party system they had set out to break”. Except, of course, that the SDP lost the battle but won the war: Tony Blair’s victory under the New Labour banner in 1997 was, in reality, the SDP’s triumph. Socialism had been abandoned, and it was social democracy that propelled Labour to its biggest ever election victory.

Ukip may yet fail as an electoral force: it is, after all, hard to imagine a party reliant on the votes of a declining demographic of older, white, working-class, non-graduate men surging to victory. But that doesn’t mean they can’t win, just as the SDP did a generation before. It’s not so hard to imagine the Tories fighting an election in 2020 with a leader championing Better Off Out anti-Europeanism and decrying immigration. That’s the real danger Ukip poses.

Click here to read the whole piece.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Site news.
Advert

One Comment

  • JohnTilley 1st Jan '15 - 6:45am

    “…..a declining demographic of older, white, working-class, non-graduate men…”

    Hmmm. How odd that this is the description of people who we are told vote for UKIP.

    It seems to describe me.

    Although as AJP Taylor once said – “if I woke up and looked in the mirror and saw that I was white I would seek medical attention.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Neil Hickman
    @Simon - I think you should also note that Dan Neidle goes a long way beyond the "oh, we can't possibly touch the obscenely wealthy" position. He specifically a...
  • Jana
    “If the purpose of an economy is not to do that, then what is the incentive for those at the bottom to remain engaged in the economy, democracy and even socie...
  • Nonconformistradical
    @Peter Martin As far as I am concerned the terrorism issuue is not relevant to my point. My point is that the level of violence used against the police offic...
  • Simon McGrath
    "Over the very same years, the public wealth of the country fell from a positive £337 billion to minus £1 trillion." This is obviously nonsense "That is no...
  • Neil Hickman
    @David - Granted, by 1979 the "progressive" nature of the income tax system had become ridiculous. The top rate of income tax was 83% and you had an "investment...