The Independent View: In tough times, parents need the government to help them, not to judge them

fifties-familyBackbench Conservative MPs are causing trouble and the marriage tax allowance is rearing its ugly head again. First, the so-called Alternative Queen’s speech would introduce tax breaks for married couples, alongside other excruciatingly right wing measures such as a Margaret Thatcher Day and the reintroduction of the Death Penalty. Also this week Tim Loughton has tabled an amendment to the Finance Bill which would introduce a tax break for married couples with children under five, where one parent is a breadwinner and the other is a homemaker.

Don’t Judge My Family, the campaign against the marriage tax allowance, has been inundated with emails from people across the country, angry and outraged that the government wants to use the tax system to enforce an old fashioned model of family life. How dare the government tell us being married and having one parent staying at home is the right way to bring up our children?

Those who would lose out from Tim Loughton’s amendment include:

  • those couples who are least well off, where neither parent is able to work
  • single parent families (in which 1 in 4 children grow up)
  • widows or widowers with young children
  • parents where both (or one) earn a low wage
  • parents who choose not to get married.

This is simply unfair. The amendment is a kick in the teeth for all these hardworking families who are doing the best for themselves and their kids. In these tough times, Mums and Dads need the government to help them, not to judge them.

Because the amendment leaves it open for the Chancellor to set the thresholds for the tax break, it’s not yet clear how much this policy would cost. Based on figures quoted by the House of Commons library, we estimate between £0.5bn and £1.5bn. When the government is just about to cut another £11.5bn from public spending, it’s even more outrageous if they can find money to judge our families.

If they were really serious about supporting children and families, they could invest in relationship counselling, reopen SureStart centres, tame the cuts to child benefit or put more money helping families fleeing domestic violence. But they aren’t. They care more about chasing right wing votes.

The Coalition Agreement enables Liberal Democrat MPs to abstain on a marriage tax allowance, although  Nick Clegg is a vocal opponent.  This amendment – to be debated 1st or 2nd July – will not be supported by the government. So Liberal Democrat MPs are free to say what they really think. We hope they join with us and say Don’t Judge My Family!

You can sign up here: www.dontjudge.org.uk and follow at @dontjudgemy

* Julianne Marriott is Campaign Director of Don’t Judge My Family.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in The Independent View.
Advert

2 Comments

  • “The amendment is a kick in the teeth for all these hardworking families who are doing the best for themselves and their kids. ”

    No, it’s the current system – the one the author’s article supports – that is a kick in the teeth for single income hardworking families. Maybe if the author actually believed in the concept of “Don’t judge my family”, she would ‘t exclude single income families from her category of “hardworking families”.

    This proposal will win votes for the Conservatives from other parties. The Lib Dems as partners in this coalition will lose votes to them if they ignore this idea. “Gifting” votes to other parties does not make electoral sense.

  • Peter Davies 25th Jun '13 - 8:36pm

    The Amendment is unfunded so your list of who loses is pure speculation. There are a lot of ways to raise 1.5 bn that have no impact on any of these groups.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 31st May - 10:46pm
    Lorenzo Cherin: David Cameron was campaigning with Sadiq Khan and made Labour's case about the EU protecting workers rights, maternity rights, etc. He presumably knows...
  • User AvatarCaron Lindsay 31st May - 10:35pm
    Please don't derail this into a debate about VAT generally. It's a post about the irony of Leave banging on about VAT on fuel like...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill 31st May - 10:13pm
    Oops, ITV News subtitled Alex Carlisle as Donald Trump, who looks different and talks differently.
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 31st May - 10:12pm
    That's not what the electorate and a lot of our own supporters thought. Failure of communication... or are 48% of our supporters not terribly bright...
  • User AvatarPeter Davies 31st May - 9:45pm
    We stated our position clearly. Our opponents weren't in a position to make anything of it because they were both planning VAT rises.
  • User AvatarStevan Rose 31st May - 9:25pm
    James, I studied EU law and European Political Cooperation to degree level. I could bore for England on the wonders of the EU. I understand...