Three things you need to know about the new powers going to Scotland

There are some very interesting articles about the forthcoming Scotland Bill, the details of which were unveiled on Thursday, in today’s press.

The Tories were trying to back out and Clegg, Alexander and Carmichael wouldn’t let them

According to Michael Moore in Scotland on Sunday today.

 It is not a surprise to me that the Conservatives fought tooth and nail to remove some of the key elements of the Smith agreement.

We saw in the commission itself they adopted two or three different positions in the space of 48 hours on welfare and were clearly in touch with London colleagues at every stage.

We resisted it there and I am glad that my Liberal Democrat colleagues have resisted it in terms of the bill. There is no question in my mind that without Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael, Chief Secretary to the Treasury Danny Alexander and Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg digging in on this over the last crucial 48 hours before the bill was published, we would have ended up with the whole Smith process unravelling.

I think that this shows that it’s the Liberal Democrats, not the SNP who are the true guardians of devolution. The SNP will do anything to undermine devolution because they want independence. It’s what they do and they will never change. If we were them, we wouldn’t either, although I’d like to think we would be more constructive than they are.

Carmichael says there’s no Westminster veto on new welfare powers.

All the criticism from the SNP about the new welfare powers being watered down is wrong. Alistair Carmichael was asked about this on the Sunday Politics. The Orkney studio where he was interviewed looked a lot tidier than it did the last time, too. He said that the only thing that requires agreement is the start date  not on actual proposals. It makes sense, too. If Scots want the UK benefits system to deliver a new Scottish benefit, they will need to have some notice to get their systems in order. He added that the duty to consult on new welfare powers is reciprocal, as is fitting for governments working in partnership. If the UK government wants to enact welfare reform, it needs to consult the Scottish Government. You can watch his interview here

Nick: Never mind the SNP’s negativity. Lib Dems have delivered home rule

In an article on Scotland on Sunday, Nick was very clear on the fact that use of powers could not be vetoed by Westminster. He also laid out the Lib Dem position on the voting rights of Scottish MPs, saying that these should be protected:

Home rule is part of the Liberal Democrats’ DNA. It’s part of our history going back to William Gladstone’s Midlothian campaign in the late 1870s. We have always been 100 per cent behind the transfer of powers away from London and these new powers mark an exciting time in Scottish politics.

This is why I have been dismayed by the antics of the SNP to manufacture a row about the draft clauses that the UK government has some kind of “veto” over policy areas that will be devolved to Scotland. This is categorically not true. The UK government has guaranteed we will not veto any such decisions.

Instead of welcoming new powers and talking Scotland up, the SNP spent Thursday in a fog of negativity desperately trying to find an excuse not to endorse a package they have already signed up to.

While strengthening the Scottish Parliament my party has endorsed the letter and spirit of the Smith Commission, including the right of Scottish MPs to vote on budget decisions.

The Tory proposals to take away these rights are plain wrong. They are trying to correct an anomaly in the UK Parliament in light of devolution by creating another anomaly.

 And what about the borrowing powers they already have?

And now a fourth thing about the powers they already have, as a bonus. Before we even start with the new Bill, there are new borrowing powers available to the Scottish Government from this year under the terms of the Scotland Act 2012. Holyrood magazine asked representatives from the main parties what they would borrow money for. Willie Rennie’s view ws this:

After 100 years of talking about home rule I am proud that we are in a place where we can talk in real terms about what we will do with home rule. The capital borrowing powers will mean the Scottish Government has no excuses when it comes to supporting the big infrastructure projects in places like the North East and Highlands. The AWPR [Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route] has hardly started and transport infrastructure is crumbling. We need to see concrete action from the SNP and these powers should mean there is no excuse for continuing to shortchange the North East and Highlands.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

8 Comments

  • So if you have delivered Home Rule why did Alistair Carmichael say that the net proposals were a significant advance on the road to Home Rule?

  • And Para 4.2.8 of the White Paper also make clear that Mr Carmichaels interpretation of the position on welfare powers is to put it kindly misinformed.

  • Denis Mollison 26th Jan '15 - 8:45am

    Congratulations to Carmichael, Clegg and Alexander for keeping the Smith Commission process on-track, but its still well short of Home Rule.

    I wish I could find the 1913/14 Scotland Home Rule bill for comparison. Thinking of which, a look back at how politics functioned in the Liberal government just before WW1, relying on the Irish nationalists for its majority, might be useful preparation for any post-May negotiations.

  • Really!!!!!

  • Jane Ann Liston 26th Jan '15 - 12:45pm

    We shouldn’t be surprised, though, that the SNP immediately rubbished the Smith proposals. For them, independence is the Holy Grail so naturally enhanced devolution isn’t enough for them. I’m sure most of us could have predicted their response weeks ago; in fact it was probably written the day after they signed up to the Smith agreement was signed off! Almost anything is justified as far as they are concerned if it advances the dream of breaking up the UK.

    I do wonder which part of ‘no veto ‘ the SNP do not understand. Perhaps of course they are misreading it as a ‘no vote’? That might explain the stubborn refusal to accept the fact.

    And, by the way, I agree with the newspaper correspondent yesterday who says that the SNP are really hoping for a Tory government after May, the more right-wing, the better, in the hope that Scots will prefer the fire to the frying-pan and give the ‘right’ answer to the next referendum. All this talk of a possible pact with Labour, given that they have said they want to wipe them out in Scotland, is eyewash. But I’m sure most posters on this forum knew that already.

  • @Jane Ann Liston

    Have you read the Cmnd Paper?

  • David Howell 26th Jan '15 - 2:33pm

    How is it . . . “Home Rule”. . . when 75% of tax raising powers and 85% of benefits allocation remain with Westminster?

    The people of Scotland are not fools! They can clearly see that “the Vow” has not been honoured and will vote accordingly in the coming election(s).

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • GWYN WILLIAMS
    "And it is not just fingers. I got a very nasty dog bite on the bum once." It's only Monday and I have a mental image of someone trying to push a leaflet throug...
  • Alex Macfie
    Steve J Smith: Яeform may claim to be against the Online "Safety" (sic) Act and other online "for the children" surveillance for the sake of getting a few vote...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Tom, Your figure of the richest 200 families being worth £711 bn suggests that a 1% wealth tax should bring in £7bn on them alone. I'd start with thes...
  • John Smith
    And yet millions of people have managed to protest against Israel’s actions without getting arrested. It’s almost like expressing support for a group tha...
  • Nick Baird
    I agree with Tara (without necessarily supporting what the PA activists did). It was wrong to proscribe PA as terrorists, and in any case that happened *after* ...