This is a report of the meeting of the Liberal Democrats English Council, held on Saturday at University College London.
The English Council is the governing body of the Liberal Democrats in England and meets twice a year to consider matters of importance to the English Party.
Speech from Nick Clegg
The day started with a speech from the Deputy Prime Minister. Before heading off to chair meetings at the G8, Nick Clegg had stopped into University College London to give a message of optimism to party members.
While he touched on some of the themes he would later discuss in his speech to the Local Government Conference, this speech was primarily intended to rally the troops.
He was optimistic about the future prospects for the Liberal Democrats. The experience of coalition government has been a stormy one but the party had come through resilient; “we haven’t been broken… having been tested in the furnace”. He said he was grateful to the party membership, whose achievement this was.
He said that the Liberal Democrats were “unapologetically in favour of centre ground politics” repeating the message that it was the only the Liberal Democrats who could deliver a stronger economy and a fairer society. This put the Party “in the right place”, especially that this centre ground is a space being vacated by the other two main parties.
In conclusion he argued the Liberal Democrats can do much better in 2015 than critics of the Party allow and even better than we often believe ourselves.
Other business
The future prospects for the Party were also the topic of the two presentations that followed the speech. These were from Sarah Ludford MEP about the London party’s preparations for next year’s European Elections, which was particularly well received by the members present, and a presentation from the Liberal Democrat’s Director of Campaigns, Hilary Stephenson, discussing the recent local elections and where the party goes from here.
The meeting was then given a report from the Chair, Peter Ellis, which generated a lively debate on the topic of diversity and representation and what more the English Party should be doing to in this area.
This was followed by a report from the Vice Chair, Mike Wheatley, who focussed on the work of the regional party committee. This body works with the regions to encourage co-operation and the exchange of good practice. It also provides support to the regions in operating the party’s disciplinary procedures and had in recent months been dealing with several difficult disputes. He also noted that the English Party have published a new guide to the role of the regional chair.
He also reported back on the plans for the re-organisation of local parties. Each region has been working on their proposal for the new boundaries, a combination of constituency and local authority, that each of the local parties in their area will cover. It appears that, while the process has been at times difficult, the regions have made good progress. The reorganisation plans need to be in place by the end of this month and the English Party will be issuing new guidance on the next steps.
The meeting also received the usual reports from the Treasurer, the Chair of the English Candidates’ Committee, and from the English Council’s representatives on various other party bodies. Finally, the meeting passed,with some discussion but without controversy, a number of minor constitutional amendments to the English Party’s constitution and the model constitution for local parties.
You can find out more about the work of the English Party in my previous post What does the English Council do? and in the LDV English Council archive.
* Andy Strange is a member of the Lib Dems' English Council. He blogs at Strange Thoughts.



4 Comments
Good to know the English Council discussed and noted the lack of progress within the Party on Black and Asian (BAME) representaion in elected office But what action did they propose to address the problem Did they for example note the existance of the Dadabhai Noaroji Award for the Local Party that does most to promote BAME partcipation and representation and propose any actions ?
“…re-organisation of local parties”
Deckchairs……Titanic
“In conclusion he argued the Liberal Democrats can do much better in 2015 than critics of the Party allow and even better than we often believe ourselves.”
In 2007, Clegg pledged to double the number of Lib Dem MPs over two general elections – and hasn’t gone back on his word since. that would be 24 MPs in Scotland where the Lib Dems struggled to win any constituenecies for Holyrood.
He must have confused the word “double” with “halve”.
Talking about the centre ground of politics is so naff. Wasn’t it Nick Clegg who said “There are two crucial dividing lines in British politics. First – the dividing line between progressives and conservatives – between those who believe in tackling inherited disadvantage and removing the scars of poverty, and those who don’t. And second – the dividing line that splits liberals from the advocates of big government solutions – a dividing line that splits the progressive cause.”
What exactly is the center ground between those two dividing lines ?
Thank you for the report back. I do not think the English Council should be abolished, but it should not be working only as a forum for people like the Regional Chairs, it should represent ordinary party members and be accessible to them, as I suggested in more detail in my response to your previous post. There is the practical difficulty, that the English Council has no website or contact details published, so no one can find out more about what decisions have been made by the English Council which affect local parties. For example you said in your previous post that the Model Constitution for Local Parties was being amended to deal with online banking, but the copy of the Model Constitution on the Federal website has not been amended since 2010, so no one who is not a member of the English Council can find out what changes have been made.