Today’s PMQs

My feed reader shows me the latest Iain Dale Daley Dozen in which he points to us and asks why we didn’t cover PMQs today.

Although it may not have been our finest hour, the real reason is that Stephen, who usually covers that for us, is away, and none of the rest of us remembered until we were prompted.

For the sake of completeness, here is the full exchange between Vince Cable, covering for Nick Clegg today, and Hariet Harman, who was in the Prime Minister’s shoes.

Dr. Vincent Cable (Twickenham) (LD) rose—

Hon. Members: Hear, hear!

Mr. Speaker: Order.

Dr. Cable: May I begin by adding my condolences over the soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq?

It was reported earlier this week that Her Majesty the Queen had cancelled her diamond wedding celebrations because it was judged inappropriate to engage in extravagance at a time of economic gloom and recession. Does the Leader of the House share my view that that demonstrates Her Majesty’s unerring instinct for the public mood, or do the Government think that she was overreacting?

Ms Harman rose—

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman should not discuss Her Majesty the Queen. Perhaps he could try asking another question. He has used one up, and he will not get another after that.

Dr. Cable: I am very happy for the Leader of the House to return to the issue of economic gloom and recession. Does she agree with that assessment?

Ms Harman: As I told the right hon. Member for Richmond, Yorks (Mr. Hague), our concern is to ensure that people continue to have jobs. As the hon. Gentleman will know, the economy still contains 670,000 vacancies, and we want to ensure that it continues to grow as it has for some 62 consecutive quarters.

Dr. Cable rose—

Mr. Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman is out of order. I must move on.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News and PMQs.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Hywel Morgan 2nd Apr '08 - 11:44pm

    It was only not our finest hour if it was an omission. I’m not so sure it was and we were trying to make a point about the antiquated rules that govern Parliament.

    Coming on the day that the Information Commissioner overruled Commons authorities and required disclosure of how allowances are spent on party propaganda (sorry members newsletters) it seemed like a pretty good point

  • David Morton 3rd Apr '08 - 8:51am

    I think Michael Martin came out of this worse than Vince. While its a mild clanger to mention the Queen in a PMQ when rules say you can’t I though Martin was really partisan in the way he dealt with it.

    I’ve always held to the “dignity of office” arguement about Martin. We shouldn’t undermine him because the office he holds is more important than the efficency of a tempory holder of it.

    However after yesterday I don’t see why we shoyuldn’t just say he’s useless, biased and should go asap.

    The only reason to hold fire would be if we thought there was a reasonable chance of getting it for Ming or Alan Beith.

  • This isn’t the first time Speaker Martin has proven that he isn’t above the parties, but just a tool of the Labour Party. Speaker or not, Liberal Democrats should consider running a candidate against him in the next GE.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    Peter Martin, I agree that the lack of a real financial incentive for many people to take up low-paid jobs rather than living on benefits is a problem. But ...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    David, no apology needed, and less disagreement than you might think. I did not come to this party through its history, I came through its principles and a shop...
  • Jana
    @David Raw “…your message would have more impact if you actually produced some verified empirical evidence..” Perhaps this BBC news item from 15 years a...
  • Peter Davies
    "Labour and nature are the source of all value". The problem is that in the UK, much of that labour was by people long since dead. Unskilled labour these days i...
  • David Raw
    @ Jana "I do not blame people on benefits seeking to maximise their income by claiming PIP, particularly by getting their children diagnosed with ADHD and th...