Author Archives: Jean-François Burford

For disabled people, a simple game of football comes with a terrifying price tag: their benefits

Disabled people are encouraged to exercise to protect their health and independence. Yet many fear that participating in sport could jeopardise the financial support they rely on. This is the Activity Trap, and it must end.

For most people, playing football is an opportunity to exercise, enjoy themselves and connect with others. For some disabled people, however, stepping onto a football pitch comes with a frightening question: could this game cost me my benefits?

Health professionals, ministers and sporting bodies regularly promote physical activity for its benefits to physical health, mental wellbeing and social connection. Adapted football and other inclusive sports can help disabled people maintain mobility, manage long-term conditions and combat isolation.

Yet research by Durham University and Disability Rights UK highlights a disturbing contradiction. Their research examines the “Activity Trap”: the fear that physical activity could jeopardise the financial support disabled people depend on.

The findings are stark. 80% of disabled people surveyed worried that physical activity could put their benefits at risk, while more than one in four reported having benefits or other financial support denied or removed in circumstances they associated with being active. Although these findings do not establish the reasons behind every individual decision, they reveal the depth of anxiety surrounding participation.

This is not simply a question of confidence. It is about whether disabled people feel safe enough to participate in community life.

Grassroots football already presents considerable barriers. Accessible pitches and changing facilities remain limited, while adapted equipment, specialist transport and personal support can make participation prohibitively expensive. Finding a suitable club is difficult enough without the additional worry of losing essential financial support.

The Activity Trap reaches into the relationship between disability benefits and assessments of physical ability.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , and | 5 Comments

London’s football pitch crisis is freezing out disabled children. We must stop treating inclusion as a charity luxury

There is a cruel irony at play on London’s public sports pitches. While national governing bodies proudly launch multi-million-pound strategies to make football “the people’s game,” the cold reality of urban economics is quietly locking the most vulnerable children out of the sport entirely. For young Londoners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND), the barrier to entry is no longer just a lack of willing coaches; it is a hyper-financialised property market that has turned the simple act of kicking a football into a luxury.

On paper, the vision is exactly what the sport has desperately needed. The FA’s landmark “Football Without Limits” strategy is a genuinely progressive and vital intervention, injecting long-overdue funding and infrastructure into pan-disability football networks. Supported by corporate backing, this national push is finally providing the framework, specialized kit, and subsidized programs like the Comets initiative that grassroots volunteers have cried out for over decades. It is a massive step forward, proving that the will to change the game exists at the very top.

Yet, as this commendable national strategy hits the streets of the capital, it collides with a brutal, localised reality.

Despite the undeniable progress, grassroots organisers caution that London’s spatial and economic pressures mean the fight is far from over. Bureaucracy can still delay small grants from reaching the smaller, community led estates where the need is highest. Moreover, as land value pressures continue to squeeze urban green spaces, keeping pitch hire affordable remains a volatile challenge.

This isn’t a failure of the FA’s ambition; it is a fundamental design flaw in how urban spaces are managed. While governing bodies provide the funding, clubs must navigate layers of complex auditing and compliance to access it. The tragic paradox is that the tiny, estate based clubs embedded deepest within working class communities, where the concentration of under resourced SEND families is highest, rarely have the administrative muscle to unlock these coffers. Instead, the money naturally pools around wealthier, established suburban clubs with dedicated committees. The system, by design, feeds the fed.

Even when a community club beats the bureaucracy and secures a grant, they run headfirst into London’s brutal spatial politics. As inner city green spaces are swallowed by high density developments, grassroots football has been pushed onto commercial artificial pitches. In London, these venues operate on staggering commercial margins, with pitch hire fees frequently topping £100 an hour.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged , , and | 6 Comments

The government’s £1bn school sports revamp talks a good game on SEND inclusion. So why are disabled children being benched?

The government’s headline-grabbing £1 billion overhaul of school sport is wrapped in the shiny vocabulary of modern progressive policy: equity, accessibility, and an explicit promise to end the “fitness postcode lottery.” On paper, it looks like a long-overdue victory for children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND). The policy promises a needs-led system where “one-size-fits-all” gym classes are scrapped, replaced by specialist coaches from Paralympics GB, adapted sports like boccia, and a massive facility fund to tear down physical barriers.

But talk to any headteacher or parent of a disabled child this week, and the mood is not one of celebration. It is one of sheer panic.

Beneath the utopian rhetoric of the new PE and School Sport Partnerships Network lies a classic bureaucratic blunder: a gaping chasm between killing off an old system and launching a new one. In its haste to centralise control, the Department for Education has abruptly ended the direct Primary PE and Sport Premium; the ring-fenced bank transfers that schools have relied on for over a decade to hire their own local, trusted SEND sports coaches.

The catch? The new centralised network, which is supposed to deploy replacement coaches into playgrounds, will not be fully operational until Spring 2027. To bridge the gap, Ministers have thrown schools a financial crumb: a transitional payment worth a measly one-third of their usual annual sports budget.

The real-world math of this shortfall is devastating. School leaders are not dealing in “short-term adjustments”; they are dealing in cancellations. A recent poll by Schools North East revealed that nearly half of all schools expect to cut extra-curricular clubs this autumn, with a staggering third predicting direct cuts to specialized SEND-inclusive provisions. Two-thirds of schools expect to lay off local coaching staff.

For a neurodivergent child or a young person with physical disabilities, a sports club is rarely just a game. It is a vital sanctuary for mental health, sensory regulation, and social connection. Building the trust required for a SEND student to participate in physical activity takes months, sometimes years, of dedicated work by specialised coaches. Sweeping those familiar faces away this term because a centralised government portal isn’t ready to launch yet is a betrayal of the very children this policy claims to rescue.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | Leave a comment

Why A&E must stay free. But funding must change.

Few institutions define modern Britain as strongly as the National Health Service. Created in 1948 under the leadership of Aneurin Bevan, the NHS was founded on a simple but powerful promise: Healthcare would be free at the point of use, based on need rather than ability to pay. For generations this principle has been a source of national pride. Yet today the NHS faces unprecedented pressure, and unless we are prepared to rethink how it is funded, that founding promise itself may become impossible to sustain.

Demand on the system has grown dramatically over the past two decades. Britain has an ageing population, chronic conditions such as diabetes and heart disease are increasing, and advances in medical technology, while lifesaving, are also expensive. Accident and Emergency departments, in particular, have become the frontline of these pressures. Long waiting times, overcrowding and staff burnout are symptoms of a system that is trying to do more than its current funding model can realistically support.

The debate about the NHS often becomes polarised. On one side are those who fear any change represents the creeping privatisation of healthcare. On the other are voices calling for a more market-driven model, similar to that of the United States. Both positions miss an important point. Reforming the system does not have to mean abandoning the core values of the NHS. Instead, it can mean modernising how the system is funded while protecting the principle that no one should be denied care when they need it most.

One possible solution is to preserve free access to emergency services while introducing a shared funding approach after initial assessment. Under such a model, anyone could still walk into an A&E department and receive immediate care without charge or paperwork. Treatment would begin exactly as it does now, guided only by medical urgency.

Once the patient has been stabilised and assessed, however, the cost of treatment could be shared between public funding and private insurance. A simple example might involve a 50/50 split: half funded by the state and half covered by an insurance provider. No one would be turned away or left with an unaffordable bill.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 31 Comments

Make Culture Really Count

Governments don’t just underestimate culture, media and sport, they depend on them, while systematically failing to sustain them.

In the UK, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport stands as a formal acknowledgement that these sectors matter. In practice, it has become a symbol of something else: a gap between rhetoric and reality that has gone unchallenged for too long.

That gap is indefensible. The creative industries contribute £145.8bn to the economy, around 5.5% of GDP and the wider DCMS sectors account for close to a tenth of all economic output. They employ millions, grow faster than the wider economy, and project British influence globally. By any serious economic measure, they should be central to national strategy.

Instead, they are treated as optional.

This isn’t just a matter of perception; it is built into the system. At local level, most spending on arts, culture and sport is not protected. Councils are not required to fund it. When budgets come under pressure, as they have year after year, these areas are cut first. Libraries close. Youth services disappear. Community sport collapses. What is lost is not just access, but opportunity and once gone, it rarely returns.

This is not inevitable. It is the result of political design.

Nationally, the imbalance is just as stark. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport operates with a fraction of the budget of departments such as the National Health Service or the Ministry of Defence, despite overseeing sectors that generate a significant share of UK growth. This is not about affordability. It is about priority and a persistent failure to align investment with economic reality.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged | 2 Comments

Is Football losing its head?

English football likes to think of itself as the most competitive, compelling league system in the world. And in many ways, the Premier League still delivers on that promise every weekend. But financially, the game is drifting into something far less credible: a system where losses are disguised, rules are gamed, and profit increasingly exists only on paper.

The rise of intragroup sales is not a clever innovation. It is a symptom of a broken model. When clubs such as Newcastle United or Chelsea can transform massive losses into tidy profits by selling assets to companies owned by the same people, …

Posted in News | Tagged | 12 Comments

Education in 2050: Preparing Today for Tomorrow’s Schools

Imagine a classroom where every student is learning something different, guided by technology that adapts instantly to their needs. Some collaborate with peers across the world, while others receive tailored support from artificial intelligence tutors. The teacher is no longer delivering a single lesson to the whole class, but acting as a mentor, supporting creativity, discussion, and critical thinking. This is not a distant fantasy, but a realistic picture of education in 2050.

The schools of the future will look very different from those many of us remember. Traditional models: rows of desks, fixed timetables, and a heavy reliance on memorisation; are already evolving. By 2050, education is likely to be more personalised, more connected, and more closely aligned with the demands of a rapidly changing world. The challenge for governments today is not whether change will come, but whether they are prepared to shape it.

A defining feature of future education will be personalised learning. Advances in artificial intelligence will allow lessons to adapt in real time to each student’s progress. Instead of moving at the same pace, learners will receive support or acceleration as needed. This approach has the potential to make education both more effective and more equitable, ensuring that no student is left behind or held back.

Technology will also transform the role of teachers. Rather than serving primarily as sources of information, teachers will increasingly become facilitators of learning. Digital tools will assist with grading, feedback, and routine tasks, freeing up time for educators to focus on developing students’ creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence. In this way, technology will enhance, rather than replace, the human element of teaching.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 4 Comments

One Hub, Two Services: Why Police and Healthcare Should Share the Same Front Door

Across the United Kingdom, the role of the local high street is changing. Many of the civic buildings that once anchored communities, such as local police stations, small health centres, and council offices, are gradually disappearing as services modernise and budgets tighten. While change is inevitable, it raises an important question: how can we keep public services visible, accessible, and connected to the communities they serve?

One promising answer is the Integrated Community Hub. This would be a shared public building where Community Minor Injury Units (MIUs) and Neighbourhood Police Teams operate under the same roof. Rather than maintaining separate facilities scattered across towns and cities, a hub creates a single, welcoming location where residents can access help, advice, and care.

Posted in Op-eds | Tagged and | 5 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Graham Evans
    Whatever the message, we need a leader who can clearly enunciate it, and not simply make party policy on the hoof. Ed Davey's intervention on the issue of local...
  • Peter Davies
    "Wanting to tear down historical statues , monuments , portraits, sanatise books etc ….It’s what the Taliban did in Afghanistan." It's also something Cromwe...
  • PM
    If Brexit is the cause of all our problems in the UK, what is the cause of the similar, or even worse, problems in France, Germany, Belgium, Italy etc? The ...
  • David S
    Even if one's conclusion after examining all the complexities of the Civil War (which is a good deal more than "monarchy vs. democracy") is that Cromwell was a ...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    Much-needed piece. You are right that young people are the audience, but I am not sure Europe is the way in. The polling you quote shows they already agree with...