Genocide. Genocide. Genocide.
For two years this word has been taboo as we’ve watched Israel carrying out its atrocities in Gaza. Most of us have avoided using it for fear of….what? Yes, we’ve rightly considered ‘genocide’ a powerful, extreme word, largely associated with the horrors of the Holocaust and Rwanda: a word that mustn’t be used lightly, without proper investigation of the true facts. But let’s be honest. We’ve also been terrified to call out the blatant killing of civilians and ethnic cleansing in Gaza for what it is, because in all likelihood we’d be accused of antisemitism or supporting Hamas terrorism.
But on Tuesday this week things changed. The United Nations’ Human Rights Council published a report by an Independent International Commission of Inquiry into Israel’s actions in Gaza. It concluded that “Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The Commission of Inquiry urges Israel and all States to fulfil their legal obligations under international law to end the genocide and punish those responsible for it.”
Suddenly ‘genocide’ in Gaza is no longer the subject of conjecture and hypothesis. it brings us back to facts, using international law and carefully-researched evidence as the yardstick.
More specifically, the Commission, which has been investigating the events on and since 7 October 2023 for the last two years, concludes that Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces committed four of the five genocidal acts defined by the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the Palestinians in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent births.”
“The Commission finds that Israel is responsible for the genocide in Gaza,” said Navi Pillay, Chair of the Commission, who headed the tribunal into the Rwanda Genocide. “It is clear that there is an intent to destroy the Palestinians in Gaza through acts that meet the criteria set forth in the Genocide Convention.” At the report’s announcement Judge Pillay also called the findings “a moral outrage and a legal emergency”.
Defending the Report against an intense backlash from Israel, Pillay and her colleagues have been quick to point out that, far from being pro-Hamas, the Commission took a strong stance against Hamas on 10th October 2023, denouncing Hamas atrocities against Israel as war crimes. They also stress that “explicit statements by Israeli civilian and military authorities and the pattern of conduct of the Israeli security forces indicate that the genocidal acts were committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip as a group.” In other words, key evidence of Israel’s intentions of genocide has come from the blatant words and actions of Israel’s leadership itself.
As a result of the UN’s findings, the language of media reports has started changing, with the Report on Genocide dominating Tuesday morning’s news programmes – alongside the stepped-up bombing of Gaza City. A detailed account of the report by the BBC’s Jeremy Bowen was headlined “a blunt indictment of Israel’s actions in Gaza”. Channel 4 News’s Lindsey Hilsum tweeted, “Many concluded long ago that Israel is committing genocide. Now a UN Commission has laid out evidence leading to the same conclusion”. Elsewhere in her substack she points out that a growing number of genocide scholars had previously come to the same conclusions as the UN commission.
And now politicians, led by the Lib Dems, have started boldly using the G-word too. Asked about the report on Tuesday’s Channel 4 News, Ed Davey accepted the word wholeheartedly, linking it to his decision to boycott Trump’s royal banquet. And on Instagram we see him firmly asserting “I say with them [the UN Commission] there IS a genocide.”
Could this be the start of a more courageous Lib Dem assertion of our vision for peace, human rights and the rule of law in the Middle East? In the month when Britain and our European allies are likely to recognise Palestine for the first time, we shouldn’t be afraid of honouring Britain’s historic debt to the Palestinian people, and promoting their statehood – all topics which will be widely discussed and debated at this weekend’s Party Conference.
We are right to be careful in the use of language in these charged times, when society is so divided and social media has enabled unlimited thoughtless, damaging talk. Yet our reluctance to condemn Israel’s destruction of Gaza has arguably allowed Netanyahu’s regime to normalise unspeakable atrocities and war crimes that our Government now barely seems to notice. The UN Commission has produced a considered, authoritative report. Now is surely the time for Lib Dems to confidently endorse its call for “all states to fulfil their legal obligations under international law”.
* Judi Conner is a former journalist, a member in North Norfolk and a committee member of Lib Dem Friends of Palestine.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Northern Ireland debates the future of its railways in 1957
Church Green video
Thinking of standing for election or re-election next year? Helpful questions to consider
Endometriosis and acetylation
Jeff
Nonconformistradical
John Peters
David Raw
Henry
8 Comments
This is all just talk which will be ignored by Israel. Who will actually DO something effective?
Yes, as Jim Dapre has said, this is all good stuff, Judi, but we need to state precisely what we think our our legal obligations are under international law. In my view, we should have long ago imposed wide-ranging, punitive sanctions on Israel. That may not seem the ideal way to encourage Israel to try to realise they are making a terrible mistake, but only shock tactics will work now.
When Assad started using poison gas against his own people we came very close to bombing the airfields he was using, to stop him doing it again. Sanctions are a relatively benign way of enforcing international law. Israel is a former ally, but is there any reason to think they they still share our values, or that their Middle East policy in any way resembles ours ?
@Jim Dapre 18th Sep ’25 – 10:27am….This is all just talk which will be ignored by Israel. Who will actually DO something effective?
EXACTLY…
Israel has calculated, sadly correctly, that, when she eventually stops this genocide, everything will be forgiven, the sanctions on some Israeli ministers will be forgotten and Israel will be welcomed back into the ‘gang’ of international democracies..
All trade agreements with Israel, by those nations, deeming Israel guilty of genocide, should be immediately suspended and those nations should refuse to participate in events, sporting and cultural, allowing Israeli participation.. Such actions would make it far harder for Israel to ‘return to the fold’
Very well said Judi.
It’s heartening to see our leaders now speaking out very clearly. I hope they will continue to do so in their demands, both of the UK government and the Israeli government. I agree we should be calling for wider, albeit thoughtfully targeted sanctions. (I say that not because I don’t want to hold Israel to the same level of accountability as other states that have been committing genocide, but because I think over time a better understanding has developed as to how to craft effective sanctions.)
It’s been a shame to see some of our Lords undermining this message recently, suggesting that Israeli soldiers should continue to be allowed to benefit from attending UK military colleges.
I would like to see ‘friends of Israel’ being a bit friendlier towards what is left of liberal Israel – including the peace groups and NGOs, and a bit more condemnatory of what Israel’s current leaders are doing.
I won’t be at Conference, but I hope the LDFP will make it very clear to our MPs that we need Lib Dem policy to call on the UK government to impose sanctions – urgently. Starmer may suppose that formally recognising Palestine is all he needs to do to wipe out his abysmal record on the genocide, but in fact there is a good case for indicting Starmer as a partner in the genocide as well as Trump. Of course, that won’t happen, but we need to make sure the Lib Dem party puts serious pressure on our PM and Foreign Secretary to actually do something. People are dying every day because of the ineptitude of our government.
Not only is Netanyahu committing genocide, he has made it abundantly clear that Israel intends to use the deadly but very short-lived Hamas attack in October 2023 as an excuse to annex East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza. His right-wing pals in the Knesset have made similar statements, and Trump and his son-in-law are calculating how many $billions they can add to their personal wealth from real-estate deals in the stolen territories in Gaza.
I recognise that it’s unfair to suggest our government has been entirely inept. They have managed to do one thing – criminalise more than a thousand people for supporting the Palestinians at peaceful demonstrations. Starmer is obviously on his way out for various reasons, and the contempt he has shown for the will of the British people on the Gaza tragedy (albeit enacted by Yvette Cooper, but probably at the behest of ‘number ten’) is one of them.
All signatories of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights have a duty to impose an escalating level of sanctions on a perpetrator up to possible armed intervention to prevent war crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. The UK Government, led by self-declared “Zionist without qualification” Starmer won’t even recognise blatant Crimes Against Humanity, despite one Israeli minister after another stating their intention to ethnically-cleanse or kill Palestinians.
Also the late Kofi Annan’s much lauded “Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect” has been effectively silenced since making a comment on Ukraine some two years ago and on Israel’s attack on Gaza a few months after October 7th.