Democracy and Public Debate

Fake news and hate speech online – much of it spread via the giant tech platforms. Government ministers brazenly lying. Threats to the integrity of our elections through the dissemination of misinformation on social media. National newspapers that are increasingly partisan, and a local press too financially enfeebled to hold politicians to account.

In recent years, the quality of public debate in Britain has deteriorated sharply, thanks to all these factors and the increasing rejection of traditionally accepted norms of behaviour. And this threatens the very fabric of our democracy. We have lost a set of shared truths and facts around which we can base political debate. What can be done to reverse the decline?

A policy paper prepared by an FPC working group, to be debated at Autumn Conference, proposes a bold and distinctly liberal set of initiatives that carefully balance our rights and freedoms, especially the right to free speech, with the need to combat online harms and allow misinformation to be challenged.

The individual and their rights are at the very centre of Liberal Democrat values and they are also the starting point of this paper. It calls for a new Bill of Rights, fit for the digital age. This would guarantee the right to education – including lifelong education about public debate; the right to online privacy; the right for the individual to own their data; and the right to freedom of expression. To ensure freedom to take part in digital debate, it would also establish a Citizen’s Wifi service, freely available in public realm spaces.

The powers of the social media giants would be curbed through better regulation by a new, independent watchdog, which would also safeguard the independence of the BBC and ensure due impartiality among broadcasters.

Social media platforms would be required to negotiate fair compensation to news providers whose content appeared on their site, and finance a fund to support fact-checking sites and local journalism. The paper repeats the long-standing Liberal Democrat demand for full implementation of the recommendations of the Leveson inquiry and the commissioning of a Leveson 2 inquiry into relations between the press and police.

To improve the quality of debate during elections, the paper demands greater transparency around spending and social media advertisements and says the powers of the Electoral Commission must be strengthened, including the ability to impose meaningful sanctions when rules are broken.

But perhaps the best way to prevent people falling prey to online misinformation is through better education, which is why this is so central a policy in the paper. It calls for the introduction of critical thinking skills to the school curriculum, following the example of Finland, which is ranked as the European country most resilient to fake news.

It would also bring in a programme of lifelong critical thinking education, keeping citizens abreast of changing digital issues. This would include addressing the asymmetry of knowledge between social media platforms and their users, which means users’ content is used in ways they have no way of knowing, or to which they have consented.

The topicality and urgency of these issues should ensure a lively Conference debate, which will be held on Friday between 8 and 9 p.m.

The full paper can be found here.

* Martin Dickson, a former national newspaper journalist, joined the party in 2016 after the Brexit referendum. He is currently serving as chair of the Federal Policy Committee working group on Democracy and Public Debate.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Conference, Op-eds and Party policy and internal matters.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Mike Falchikov 13th Sep '21 - 6:48pm

    An excellent contribution. This should also be aimed at reform of the way Parliament works – too much empty rhetoric and a totally out of date way in which “debates” are conducted.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter
    There is a great deal of truth in the comments made by Guy. I suspect that voters today have a low opinion of all politicians and parties. The voting is more co...
  • William Francis
    The development of a black/grey market separate from the carbon rationing is a distinct possibility, as it was a reality during wartime and post-war rationing. ...
  • William Francis
    There are a number of glaring issues with this policy. Putting a value on the carbon used to produce goods and services in the complex economy of millions of...
  • Joe Bourke
    Neal writes "The next election could be as little as 12 months away. The Tories will go when they think they can win." If the Conservatives are set to gain betw...
  • Nonconformistradical
    I find it supremely ironic that while Neal Lawson's OP is titled "The Independent View: A letter to the Liberal Democrats" at the end we are told that he is a ...