Nick Clegg writes: Yes to multilateral, global disarmament

Lib Dem Voice has asked both leadership candidates to set out their views on what should be the party’s approach to Britain’s policy on nuclear weapons. First up is Nick Clegg…

My ambition is simple: nuclear disarmament around the world. Under my leadership, Britain would use every last ounce of her leverage to secure multilateral, global disarmament.

I am dismayed by suggestions we should pre-empt the 2010 talks on the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty by planning to build a new, “smaller” nuclear weapons system. Building a new warhead would almost certainly be illegal under the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty; a treaty I …

Posted in Leadership Election and Op-eds | 14 Comments
Advert

Opinion: God help us

“In my business, asking people to risk their lives is part of the job, but doing so without giving them the chance to understand that there is a life after death is something of a betrayal … inspiration best comes from a personal relationship with Jesus Christ … the example of his life, the purpose of his death and the hope that comes from his resurrection brings that special dimension to leadership and to life itself.” Isn’t it reassuring to know that the commander in chief of the British Army is more than just a few of rounds short of a full ammunition belt?

For those were the reported comments of General Sir Richard Dannatt, who managed to take time off from fighting two wars, in order to address a recent conference for evangelical Christians in Swanwick, Derbyshire. To my ears, it would have been scarcely less bizarre had he been extolling the virtues of the goddess Aphrodite, discussing his private conversations with Elvis, or perhaps suggesting that every soldier be equipped with a voodoo doll of Osama bin Laden as a key weapon in the war against terror. And yet, with one notable exception, the General’s remarks produced barely a murmur in the press; while our politicians, fearful as ever of losing the God vote, maintained a strict radio silence – such is the absurd degree of respect we routinely afford those who would order their lives (and indeed everyone else’s given half a chance) around the delusions of one or other of the ancient mythologies.

But what makes this latest public display of deranged thinking at once astonishing and deeply disturbing, is Sir Richard’s explicit invocation of a metaphysics of life after death. Failing to explain to our brave soldiers that this life is but a trivial prelude to the eternal life to come, would in his words amount to a “betrayal.” Has he forgotten so soon the apocalyptic events (if you pardon the expression) which brought on our disastrous misadventures in the Middle East? When the 9/11 hijackers ploughed into the World Trade Center in 2001, they did so with a huge grin on their faces. For they believed with chilling certainty that they were merely seconds away from entering a paradise flowing with milk and honey, scented wine and delicious fruits, and never forgetting of course the seventy-two dark-eyed rechargeable virgins (or whatever it is that devout Muslims actually believe). So it was that 16 acres of Lower Manhattan were duly demolished in the name of the “religion of peace.”

Yet now we learn that Sir Richard himself holds beliefs which, though arising from Christian culture, are qualitatively no different to those held by the 19 gentlemen who managed six years ago to upend our world in such spectacular fashion. So, whilst it seems most unlikely that the General will soon be perpetrating a terrorist atrocity of his own, do we really think that he is a fit person to be commanding the British Army?

Posted in Op-eds | 189 Comments

Lib Dems by SMS

The party today relaunched its free SMS service to send urgent news direct to your mobile phone.

The Twitter service was last used to send out information on election night, and has been quiet since.

But today a new message arrived:

Thanks for subscribing – we’re relaunching! We’ll send occasional party news, like TV spots, leadership poll news and campaign launches.

And in amongst the details on the party’s website about the leadership election,  was the following information

Get news by text message with Twitter
You can now get free new updates from the party direct to your mobile phone using the

…

Posted in Online politics | Tagged | 5 Comments

Euro and London mayoral ballot deadlines extended

Jonathan Davies, the party’s senior returning officer, has just posted the following message on LDV – it deserves flagging up:

Because of the delays in the mail, we have extended the deadline for the return of ballot papers for both the euro and London mayoral selection to 12 noon on Friday 9th November. The freepost envelope which was enclosed in the ballot paper mailing is second class, so you must post it no later than 2nd November. Or you can post your ballot paper first class post and post it until 7th November.

Please pass this information to other members you

…

Posted in News and Selection news | 15 Comments

Nominations close, and it’s official: Lib Dem leadership contest is two-horse race

Nominations for MPs wishing to succeed Ming Campbell as Liberal Democrat leader closed today at 4.00 pm. And, as expected, just two candidates – Nick Clegg and Chris Huhne – have thrown their hats into the ring.

There’s good coverage on both the BBC and The Guardian websites. Channel 4 News has published a pretty facile 5-minute guide here. And Nick Clegg answers Daily Telegraph readers’ questions here.

The party’s official coverage, including hustings information, is on the main Liberal Democrat website.

Meanwhile, leading liberal think-tank CentreForum has today published a briefing paper setting out ‘10 …

Posted in Leadership Election and News | Tagged | 2 Comments
Advert

Huhne launches his ‘Liberal Revolution’ manifesto

Lib Dem leadership contender Chris Huhne today launched his manifesto under the heading ‘The Liberal Revolution’.

You can read more on Chris’s website here. Here’s an extract from his foreword:

Britain needs a radical party to change our society, not just run it. We need a party that will breathe trust and faith back into the political process by speaking honestly about the challenges we face, and the disillusion that so many of us feel. The task for Liberal Democrats is to revive our antiestablishment edge, and remember that we are the party that wants to change the system, not

…

Posted in Leadership Election and News | 1 Comment

Let’s hear it for Evan

Over at the Daily Mail website (the things I read for Lib Dem Voice), Leo McKinstry has cobbled together an unpleasantly personal attack on Lib Dem MP, Evan Harris.

The title gives away the prejudices of the author: ‘Meet Dr Death, the Lib Dem MP Evan Harris who backs embryo experiments, euthanasia and freer abortions’. It’s the kind of poisonous cuttings job which gives journalism a bad name, and has already attracted the ire of Mail readers:

Even if I do not agree with Mr Harris’ points of view, I find this article typical of modern discussion methods, there is

…

Posted in News | Tagged | 12 Comments

Clegg: I’ll go to jail to halt ID card plans

The Guardian reports that Lib Dem leadership candidate Nick Clegg has announced he “will break the law and refuse to provide details of his identity if the government presses ahead with plans to make ID cards compulsory.”

The full story is here. Nick is reported saying:

“If the legislation is passed I will lead a grassroots campaign of civil disobedience to thwart the identity cards programme … I, and I expect thousands of people like me, will simply refuse ever to register.”

Posted in Leadership Election and News | 18 Comments

16 Labour and Tory London MPs claim for second homes

The Evening Standard yesterday named and shamed the 11 Labour and five Tory MPs representing constituencies in London, and all living within an hour’s commute of Westminster, who claim taxpayers’ money for a second home.

You can read the full story here, which identifies the 16 Labour/Tory MPs concerned. The Standard quotes James Allie, Lib Dem candidate for the London Assembly seat of Brent and Harrow:

“It is this kind of behaviour that gives politicians a bad name. The second home allowance is meant for MPs who live too far away to commute to Westminster. There is no conceivable reason why

…

Posted in News | 3 Comments

CK on the Union

Former Lib Dem leader Charles Kennedy has an article on the Guardian’s Comment Is Free website taking apart Malcolm Rifkind’s Tory proposals to create an English ‘grand committee’ to legislate on wholly English domestic policies.

You can read it in full here. Here’s an extract:

As a Scot, representing a Scottish constituency for almost the past 25 years, I do not harbour an overweening ambition to pronounce on each and every matter exclusively English. But I have always had a sense that our essentially make-it-up-as-you-go-along unwritten constitution is rather like one of those water mattresses – push down on one part

…

Posted in News | Tagged | 6 Comments

At last, some good news polls

Perhaps we should try not having a leader more often? The last three polls have shown support for the Lib Dems on the up after the nadir of mid-October.

* Today’s Guardian ICM (compared with last poll): Tories 40%(-3), Labour 35%(-1), Lib Dem 18%(+4).
* Yesterday’s Independent ComRes poll: Tories 41%(+7), Labour 33%(-4), Lib Dem 16%(+1)
* Sunday’s Observer Ipsos-Mori poll: Tories 40%(-1), Labour 41%(+3), Lib Dem 13%(+2)

Whether this is the result of the extra publicity caused by Ming’s resignation and subsequent leadership contest, or whether it’s a return to a more steady-state position after the ups-and-downs of the conference season and …

Posted in News and Polls | 9 Comments

Laws helps force Labour U-turn on schools cash-raid

Lib Dem schools spokesman David Laws was busy last week leading the attack on Labour’s plans to confiscate 5% of school cash balances. Today Labour back-tracked on its plans, with schools minister Jim Knight confirming the Government would keep its hands off, and leave school balances untouched.

The BBC has the full story here.

David is widely quoted saying:

“This daft idea should never have seen the light of day. Headteachers and governors across the country were outraged about how the clawback was set to have a devastating impact on their school budgets and could even have led

…

Posted in News | 1 Comment

Opinion: Who Decides?

In the Liberal Democrats’ leadership election, for all the strategic analysis and policy debates among the cognoscenti, it is the ‘armchair’ members who will determine this election.

This majority will rely on the mainstream media to make its choice rather than the party’s internal media and grapevines (bear in mind that the average age of party members is about 60 – this is not the Facebook generation).

The electorate is the whole paid-up membership of the party, 72,064 at the time of the previous leadership election in 2006, a figure that had fallen below 69,000 by the end of the year. …

Posted in Leadership Election and Op-eds | 11 Comments

Huhne: English votes on English laws (but only once PR’s in place)

The ‘West Lothian Question’ raised its head again this week, following the pre-announcement that the Tories want a ‘grand committee’ of English MPs to determine legislation which will affect only England.

Under the current constitutional arrangements, MPs representing Scottish and Welsh constituencies can vote on English matters, but MPs representing English constituencies cannot vote on those issues for which the devolved Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly have responsibility.

Chris Huhne, Lib Dem leadership candidate, has lent his support to the proposal – but only if the ‘grand committee’ is part of a much wider constitutional shake-up, which will also …

Posted in Leadership Election and News | 10 Comments

Opinion: Who’s going to give us a good reason to oppose an EU Reform Treaty referendum?

Those with long political memories (ie, longer than a week) may recall the kerfuffle prior to the Lib Dem conference prompted by Ming Campbell’s statement that he would oppose Tory attempts to hold a referendum on the proposed new EU reform treaty. It was, he argued, “not necessary”, as the treaty bears scant resemblance to the constitution it replaced.

A number of bloggers (and I was one of them) criticised Ming for seeming to side too readily with those who run away from a healthy debate on Europe. Ming swiftly strengthened his statement, and called instead for an early referendum on the much bigger question: does Britain want in or out?

That went a long way to placing the Lib Dems on the right side of the debate: in favour of giving the public their say on the future direction of the European Union, 32 years after the UK voted to join the Common Market. But there was always one loose end.

Some time soon, the Tories will call vote in the House of Commons on whether Britain should hold a referendum, at which point 63 Lib Dem MPs will have to make a decision – to march through the ‘no’ lobbies with Labour against a referendum; or through the ‘aye’ lobbies with the Tories in favour of one. I doubt I’m alone in feeling queasy at the former prospect.

However, that is what will happen regardless of the result of the leadership contest. Both Chris Huhne and Nick Clegg gave their full support to Ming’s statement during the Brighton conference; and have re-stated their opposition to a referendum on the treaty since the start of the leadership election.

By chance, I came across an article Nick Clegg wrote for The Guardian just over four years ago entitled, ‘We need an EU referendum: nothing will damage the pro-European movement more than appearing to have something to hide’. Now Nick was talking about the EU constitution, and his words should be read in that context, but it’s still worthy of note:

Posted in Leadership Election and Op-eds | 34 Comments

Next time Labour accuses the Lib Dems of…

… saying one thing in one place and another somewhere else, it might be worth referring to this:

“When people describe the nature of a place they are often describing the nature of its people and their behaviour as well as how it looks and feels. This gives us a real opportunity to develop a series of ‘local’ Labour brands and values. We can’t have a position where Labour has the same approaches everywhere. Greater devolution within government and the party is essential.”

– Steve Houghton, Labour leader of Barnsley Council, in a new publication, ‘Labour, Leadership and Locality: Distinctive Approaches to …

Posted in News | 8 Comments

Labour candidate convicted of forging nomination paper

From Mansfield Chad: 

A LABOUR candidate who forged a signature on his nomination form in this year’s Mansfield District Council elections has escaped with a fine.

Meden Vale man Vic Jennings, who stood in Warsop’s Birklands ward in May, could have been jailed after admitting a charge of election fraud at Nottingham Magistrates’ Court last Wednesday.

But district judge Michael Wheeler spared him prison after he was told Jennings (53) had made every effort to discourage local people from voting for him when the issue came to light.

The newspaper’s report has more details.

Posted in News | 2 Comments

Trident: what the Lib Dem blogosphere’s been saying

Chris Huhne has lit the touchpaper with his announcement that he would seek to re-open the decision agreed (by a slender margin) at the Lib Dems’ 2007 spring conference to take no decision on renewing Trident until after the 2010 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty talks.

Speaking to The Observer, Chris confirmed:

he favoured a less powerful, ‘minimal’ deterrent, even if that meant it would be ‘more vulnerable’ to attack by other nuclear powers.

The old Cold War presumption of a threatened Soviet first strike no longer made any sense, he argued. The current threats came from ‘rogue states’ or ‘terrorists’ and did not require a system like Trident to provide a deterrent.

‘It would be ridiculous to replace the system with something of equivalent power, strength and lack of vulnerability. It will also make us dependent for decades to come on the US for maintenance,’ he said.

This position is further clarified on the LibDems4Chris website:

… for the record, Chris is not a doctrinaire unilateralist; he thinks Trident is a poor purchase for Britain on cost and benefit and that it will squeeze the resources available to conventional forces. A smaller independent deterrent could be in the frame.

The Lib Dem blogosphere has been positively aglow since Chris’s intervention: reactions range from enthusiastic agreement to total opposition. Here, in chronological order, are those who have responded so far:

Posted in Best of the blogs and Leadership Election | Tagged | 21 Comments

Vince boycotts Saudi honour

Acting Lib Dem leader Vince Cable has – shock, horror – decided to put principle ahead of protocol by turning down the chance to hob-nob with Saudi King Abdullah at a state banquet tonight.

You can hear Vince give his reasons – citing Saudi Arabia’s “appalling” human rights record – on BBC Radio 4’s Today Programme here. And the Lib Dems’ Corruption is a Crime website has more here.

Proof that Vince was doing the right thing arrived with the typically pompous condemnation of the Tories’ ultra-right-wing defence spokesman Liam Fox (he sneered that the Lib Dems were …

Posted in News | Tagged | 8 Comments

James Purnell gets into further trouble

You may recall the story of James Purnell and the photoshopping incident – an NHS Trust faked a photo featuring him, the Trust and he then gave differing accounts of how it happened, he then bombed out in a rather funny TV piece trying to defend his line that he didn’t know what was going to happen and wasn’t in any way to blame for the fakery and then Pink Dog got dragged into the whole saga.

Yesterday the Telegraph and today the Mail have unearthed more evidence, and it’s looking pretty bleak for James Purnell:

After

…

Posted in News | Tagged | 3 Comments

Top of the Blogs: The Golden Dozen #36

Welcome to the 36th of our weekly round-ups from the Lib Dem blogosphere, featuring the seven most popular stories according to click-throughs from the Aggregator (21st-27th October), together with a hand-picked quintet you might otherwise have missed.

The leadership election rather unsurprisingly dominated the week – get used to it… there’s another seven weeks to go. Off we go, then, in descending order of popularity:

Posted in Best of the blogs | Leave a comment

Opinion: Is Sir David Steel the New Messiah?

Books and newspapers are filled with news and debate about crime. As far as I can tell from the evidence, crime in the UK peaked in 1995, dropped sharply up to 2000 and has dropped more slowly since. There are variations for individual categories of crime, and the whole business is complicated by changes in the way recorded crimes are counted, but the overall trend is clear.

This might give pause for thought to those who give the credit to Labour’s increasingly authoritarian laws. It normally takes a year or two from a measure being introduced in Parliament to it having an effect on the streets. If government law and order policies have made the difference, we would have to conclude that John Major gets the credit: whatever his Government did in the early ’90s must have done the trick. Blair, by contrast, appears to have managed to slow the fall: any new policies introduced around 1997 and 1998 would have started making a difference around 2000, at just the time the drop in crime petered out.

As it happens, I don’t think the evidence supports the law and order policies of either party making much difference. The economic upturn of the early ’90s probably had a much bigger effect. ASBOs, CCTV, high prison populations and rafts of draconian measures brought in or accelerated over the last decade seem to have made little or no difference.

But is there a link we’re missing? Figuring out why crime falls and rises isn’t simple. After all, if it were just a reflection of the economic state of the nation, why was crime so much higher in the 1980s than the 1970s?

I’ll admit that I really don’t know, but take some consolation from the experts not knowing (or, at least, not agreeing) either.

Which brings us onto David Steel as our modern saviour, a secular deity perhaps. Did Sir David deliver us from evil more effectively than the church has ever managed?

Posted in Op-eds | 5 Comments

Labour MP ‘unwise’ to alter news release

(Hat-tips to Jonathan Calder and Andy Mayer.)

As the BBC reports, Parliament’s standards watchdog has said an MP who inserted a quote from herself into an Electoral Commission press release had been “unwise”.

Sir Philip Mawer revealed in his annual report the unnamed MP then e-mailed the doctored press release on to the media as if it were an official release.

The MP in question is Emily Thornberry, Labour MP for Islington South & Finsbury. The case arose after she inserted a quote into an Electoral Commission press release; the Commission was urging voters to register …

Posted in News | Tagged | 1 Comment

Thanksgiving Service for Tim Garden

Like many people who were away in August, when he died, I was glad to discover that a thanksgiving service for Tim’s life is being held on 30th November. I haven’t seen it publicised it elsewhere so, with Sue’s permission, I am posting details of it here – and please do pass on the information if you know of others who would be interested in it.

Please note that if you would like to go then you need to request tickets by 9th November from the address below.

The event is being organised by the RAF, hence the formality. …

Posted in News | Leave a comment

It’s one ex-leader apiece for Chris and Nick

Last week, Paddy Ashdown endorsed Nick Clegg as leader, both in The Guardian and on YouTube.

Today, it’s the turn of David Steel to endorse a candidate – and he’s plumping for Chris Huhne. The full story is on Chris’s campaign website. Here’s Lord Steel’s quote, which also seeks to re-open the Trident debate:

“I have known Chris Huhne for 25 years, and worked last year with him on the Steel Commission. I therefore enthusiastically endorse him. He is a man of great ability and experience.

“Having enjoyed a talk with both candidates there is also one policy matter which

…

Posted in Leadership Election and News | Tagged , and | 10 Comments

New YouGov poll shows… well, not a lot, really

There’s a new YouGov poll published in today’s Telegraph, and the big news after all the tumult of the past 10 days – there’s been no change in the parties’ standings since last time the company polled: Labour 38% (nc), Tories 41% (nc), Lib Dems 11% (nc).

YouGov has tended to be the most Lib Dem-pessimistic pollster; its last five polls have shown the party to be in the range of 11-15%. It will be interesting to see what ICM, whose last five polls have shown the party ranging significantly higher – between 14-20% – reports in its next …

Posted in News and Polls | 10 Comments

Lib Dem MPs’ allowances published: who spends most, who spends least?

I can’t find it in myself to get overly excited by the annual publication of MPs’ allowances, detailing who spent what on rail fares and stationery. It is, of course, right both that the information should be collected, and right it should be published.

But there are two opposing ways of looking at the figures. Is an MP who spends least therefore ‘best value’ or are they not being assiduous enough in their job? Is an MP who spends most therefore ‘extravagant’, or are they simply ensuring the best quality of service to their constituents (and treating their staff decently)? It’s a moot point, and best left to their constituents to determine at election time.

It is also a given that MPs who represent those constituencies furthest from Westminster, and which are most sprawling, are more likely to rack up the highest travel allowances.

All of these caveats mean the figures should be treated with sceptical caution. Still, if you’re interested in finding out more about how much Lib Dem MPs spent and how they compare in their spending, read on…

Posted in News | 1 Comment

Lloyd George welcomed back to Parliament

85 years since he became the last Liberal Prime Minister, David Lloyd George today took his place in Parliament Square as Prince Charles unveiled an eight-foot statue, declaring: “In the course of a decade, beginning approximately a century ago, he established himself as one of the greatest social reformers and war leaders of the 20th Century.”

Acting Lib Dem leader Vince Cable paid his own tribute:

“This is a long-awaited tribute to a man who is generally regarded as the most radical social reformer to have led this country. Lloyd George created modern liberalism by marrying a belief in freedom

…

Posted in News | 7 Comments

Huhne officially a candidate

Well, there will be at least one name on the leadership ballot paper that will be dropping through Lib Dem members letterboxes in a few weeks’ time: Chris Huhne has formally submitted his nomination papers.

LDV has already published the list of the 10 MPs who will be backing Chris. He also has endorsements from a dozen Lib Dem peers, four members of the Scottish Parliament, one Welsh Assembly member, and 20 Council group leaders or deputies. The full list is on his campaign website here.

Chris is quoted as saying:

“I am delighted to be standing for

…

Posted in Leadership Election and News | Leave a comment

How the MPs are lining up (UPDATED)

I’m grateful to Jonathan Isaby of The Daily Telegraph, who has compiled (and allowed me to reproduce here) his up-to-date list of which Lib Dem MPs have declared for which leadership candidate so far.

Jonathan comments: “Below are my most up-to-date lists, which suggest that Huhne now cannot possibly overtake Clegg in terms of MPs declaring. Brackets state where they went in the 2006 election.”

The list shows that Nick has attracted two MPs who supported Chris as leader in 2006: Greg Mulholland and Stephen Williams; and seven who supported Simon Hughes (all listed below). Chris has attracted one former Ming Campbell backer – Tom Brake – and two MPs who supported Simon Hughes last time.

Nine MPs have stated they will not declare for any candidate; 14 have yet to state their intentions.

As was pointed out in the comments on yesterday’s thread, the number of MPs who declare for any one candidate is, in one sense, irrelevant: we are a one-member-one-vote party. Clearly, however, MPs’ endorsements will carry some influence with party members, especially among non-activists.

It will also influence how the media perceives, and then reports, the strengths of the respective leadership campaigns. Though, of course, being seen as the favourite is not always the most comfortable of positions, as Ming Campbell discovered last time. Lib Dems do love an underdog.

Posted in Leadership Election and News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , and | 26 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Anthony Acton
    What I find so disappointing about the last 2 years is that the 2024 GE result gave the party a massive boost in resources and, potentially, political influenc...
  • Nigel Jones
    I agree with Nigel Quinton, Tony Robertson and Katharine Pindar on the lack of a clear party lead on our overall vision for the future of the country which must...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Ed concluded our Autumn Conference by telling us that 'We are in the fight of our lives - and we will win!' Of course, rapturous applause followed. But somehow ...
  • Tim L
    In my experience of San Francisco, driverless cabs are smooth and courteous. I wish all drivers, there and here, were as good. I am sure in due course they will...
  • Nigel Quinton
    @Tony R - absolutely right. Burnham is echoing so much of what we have been shouting about (and being ignored) for years. Electoral reform, localism, social car...