If we do decide to take part in future Coalitions, one thing that does need to be resolved is how to approach them. Make no bones about it – we were nearly annihilated. Play it like that again, and we could be doomed to oblivion. Yet if we choose never to go into Government again, we’re doomed to impotence. Scylla and Charybdis had nothing on this.
Last time the voters viewed us as having “got into bed with the Conservatives” rather than partners in something different. The Rose Garden set the image: a love-in rather than a business partnership. One with us seen as the weak partner: dominated rather than dominant. This might elicit sympathy, but voters won’t flock to who they see as the victim. They seek out strength in their leaders. Consider how Labour portrayed Nick Clegg (unfairly) in “The Incredible Shrinking Man” in 2014’s European Elections.
We’ve had analyses on what went wrong. Nick Harvey’s “After the Rose Garden” has detailed prescriptions and is well worth a read. George Kendall posted ideas in the direction I was thinking, and Bill le Breton highlighted that a workable and successful approach already exists for hung Councils, hung Parliaments and hung Assemblies in “Life in the Balance”, by ALDC.
Things that come out again and again include making the transactional nature clear, exposing linkages with wins, losses and trade-offs. Keeping your distance (an arrangement, not a marriage) makes it harder to portray you as weak and dominated.