Tag Archives: nick clegg

In the news: Gaza, Treasury honours and Big Brother

Nick Clegg calls for suspension of EU/Israel agreement: “Innocent people are being killed and injured by a military operation that will only serve to further inflame extremism, and weaken the moderate Palestinian and Arab opinion which Israel’s long term security depends on.”

Vince Cable criticises knighthood for Treasury chief: “I would have thought it a rather premature judgment on government policy, which is far from assured of being a success. There is a slight element of self-congratulation about it.”

Ken Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions, criticises Labour’s plans for a database to track emails and phone calls …

Posted in Big mad database and News | Also tagged , and | Leave a comment

Nick Clegg’s New Year message: hope and change

You can watch it here:

There’s also a transcript on the party website.

Before you click away, here are three quick things you can do to help the film reach a wider audience:

1. Give it a rating on YouTube (free account required; you can register straight away online for one)
2. Digg it (free account required; you can register straight away online for one)
3. Share this story with others via email, Twitter or any of the other options using the links below.

Posted in Lib Dem TV | 3 Comments

My political video moment of the year

You may think that this was just another political YouTube film, this one happening to feature Nick Clegg talking about ID cards.

But watch carefully 30 seconds in for the man entering stage left with a piece of string and a banana, eaten. Ten months on, I still have no idea why he would have been doing that:

Posted in Lib Dem TV | Also tagged | 1 Comment

Our starters for 2008 – how did we do? (Part I)

A year ago, Lib Dem Voice posed 10 questions, the answers to which we believed might shape the Lib Dem year – time to revisit them, wethinks.

1. Will Nick Clegg become as well-known and respected/liked as Paddy and Charles became?

Well, not in his first year, he hasn’t – as Nick himself fully acknowleged yesterday, commenting: “This is my first year in the leadership, I have enjoyed it immensely. I also know that I am in the early stages of my leadership. If you look back in history it takes a while for all Liberal Democrat leaders to get …

Posted in Op-eds and PMQs | Also tagged , , , and | 4 Comments

Which Lib Dem MP would you want to be the next Dr Who?

The news that David Tennant is quitting his role as The Doctor in the BBC series Dr Who has prompted a flurry of speculation in recent months about who might succeed him: David Morrissey, James Nesbitt, David Walliams, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Catherine Zeta Jones have all been suggested.

To date – and perhaps not so very unsurprisingly – no Lib Dem MPs are yet in the frame for the job. But that didn’t seem any reason for Lib Dem Voice not to set our readers a different kind of Christmas quiz while we eagerly anticipate tomorrow’s special (BBC1, 6.00 pm): …

Posted in Lib Dem TV | Also tagged , , , , and | 18 Comments

Clegg “soars” in Iraq debate

A late but perhaps decisive entry for most astonishing favourable media coverage of the week comes courtesy of – make sure you’re sitting down – Quentin Letts of the Daily Mail, commenting on yesterday’s fiery Iraq debate in which both opposition leaders renewed the call for a public enquiry:

But the Opposition leader who seized the attention yesterday was Nick Clegg of the LibDems.

It was a good way for him to mark his first anniversary in charge of his party. The year has not always been easy but yesterday he soared.

Mr Clegg came in for a lot of argy-bargy from Labour and Conservative hecklers. They only made him ballsier.

He accused Mr Brown of producing ‘an extraordinarily rosy account’ of the Iraq business.

Indeed, at one point Mr Brown had spoken of the ‘continuing gratitude’ the Iraqi people felt towards Britain for ‘freeing Iraq from tyranny’.

Such gush may be okay for propaganda broadcasts on the wireless but it is not really acceptable in an adult debating chamber.

On clattered Cleggster, citing the opinion of one Barack Obama that Iraq was ‘a dumb war’.

Labour didn’t like that. Mr Clegg accused Labour of conducting the conflict ‘in secret, unaccountable, behind closed doors’ and concluded: ‘They let Britain down.’

And then Speaker Martin called, ‘Charles Kennedy’, and it was like being dragged back eight years.

Ex-LibDem leader Kennedy, plumper, pinker, pointed out that it was ‘fundamentally remiss’ of Mr Brown not to have referred in his statement to the Iraqi dead ‘who most shamefully the Americans and ourselves have not even bothered to count’.

He spoke with the voice of an ancient mariner. ‘No bodycount, no names,’ said Mr Kennedy.

He did not need to shout or gesture. A staining reproach before Christmas, it was formidably well put.

“Cleggster”? Has my meme worked? You can find Clegg and Kennedy’s full contributions to the debate in Hansard, and Clegg’s I think I’ll give you in full:

Posted in News | Also tagged , and | 9 Comments

CommentIsLinked@LDV: James Graham – Redefining liberalism

Over at The Guardian’s Comment Is Free blog yesterday, James Graham gave one cheer to Nick Clegg’s recent Why I am a Liberal speech, but urged the party to develop a much stronger response to the new recession politics. Read it in full here, but here’s the conclusion:

At a time when the Department for Work and Pensions is to be put under renewed pressure, limiting talk of social justice to tax cuts is unconvincing. What’s worse, it is clearly failing to win people over. Today’s ICM poll may show us slightly up, but over the past year the trend

Posted in LibLink | Also tagged | 9 Comments

Opinion on Nick Clegg’s first anniversary: Mark Littlewood – A number of clouds, but some silver linings

Clegg’s first year: Clegg on Clegg | Tall on Clegg | Land on Clegg | Littlewood on Clegg | Clegg on YouTube

As Nick Clegg reaches his first anniversary as Liberal Democrat leader there is much for him to reflect on, but not – at least yet – a great deal for him to celebrate.

Let’s start with the bad stuff. Then look at some areas of success. And end with some grounds for genuine optimism.

The principal bad news is the state of the party in the opinion polls. It’s as simple as that. There are, of course, staging posts of “real votes in real ballot boxes” between General Elections, but the best guide to the performance of a party – and its leader – remains the plethora of national opinion polls pumped out on a weekly basis.

There has been no obvious “Clegg effect” in the first year of his leadership. In fact, if anything, the party may have slipped backwards slightly over 2008. In broad terms, we are running at an average of around 15 – 16%, suggesting about a third of our supporters have deserted us since the last election. Some polls suggest we may have lost half our support. No poll I can find suggests we have increased it.

These are poor numbers. Not necessarily catastrophic, but definitely bad. Whatever the public “spin”, the party’s inner circle must not kid themselves that these figures are anything better than that.

The electoral problem is, of course, exacerbated by Britain’s insane electoral system. If we do lose a third of our vote, we will probably lose many more than a third of our seats. If we lose half of it, we will lose more than half of our MPs. The line between a fairly good outcome in Parliamentary seats and a disastrous one is a very thin line indeed. It feels like we are walking that line.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 47 Comments

Nick Clegg speaks… my first year as Liberal Democrat leader

Clegg’s first year: Clegg on Clegg | Tall on Clegg | Land on Clegg | Littlewood on Clegg | Clegg on YouTube

Complementing his piece for The Voice earlier today, Nick Clegg has also released a YouTube film to mark the anniversary of his election as Liberal Democrat leader:

Posted in Lib Dem TV | Also tagged and | 2 Comments

Opinion on Nick Clegg’s first anniversary: Martin Land – Has it really been one year?

Clegg’s first year: Clegg on Clegg | Tall on Clegg

Well, it has been a year. I’m sure its felt even longer to you Nick. Take some time over the holidays and quietly reflect. I know you’re busy, so let me help you:

The good bits

1. You have had a good year. Sure the odd slip-up, but no leader is ever surefooted straightaway. You’ve had the odd ‘baseball cap’ moment, but public recognition is increasing and I think they like what they see. Try to get angry more often though. After all, you are only human. Let people see it.

2. You have a new Party President, Baroness Ros Scott. I didn’t vote for her, but it’s an opportunity to reach out to alienated and ignored parts of the party that you simply don’t have the time to reach. I think she’s someone you can work closely with.

3. 19% in the latest ICM poll. That’s about as good as it gets between elections.

4. Whatever you may (or may not) think, you have a good team. Cameron would kill for your frontbench team. So, I suspect, would Gordon. If only parties had transfer fees like footballers. Think what we could get for Vince!

5. You perform well in the media. You are relaxed and in control, where Cameron just looks manic.

The bad bits

1. All political parties are having a rough time, but you need to take charge of ours. The strategy we have pursued over the past 15 years looks more and more like a scorched earth policy for local parties. Membership cannot be allowed to decline any further and we must stop bleeding local parties to death for the sake of strange ‘targeting’ strategies, which owe more to egos than demographic or psephological analysis.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 6 Comments

Opinion on Nick Clegg’s first anniversary: Stephen Tall – a work in progress

Clegg’s first year: Clegg on Clegg | Tall on Clegg | Land on Clegg | Littlewood on Clegg | Clegg on YouTube

It’s a cliché that the leader of Her Majesty’s official opposition has the most difficult job in British politics; unusually the cliché is wrong. For sure, David Cameron’s in an unenviable position (and not just because he’s a Tory); utterly powerless, the only weapons he has in his artillery are words. But at least those words are listened to; debated and disagreed with; quoted and used against him. They are not ignored.

Nick Clegg, the leader of the third largest party in the UK, the Liberal Democrats, does not (yet) enjoy the frustration of being the Leader of the Opposition. Inbetween elections when newspapers and broadcasters conspire to pretend that Britain has only two political parties, Lib Dem leaders must battle for every mili-second of publicity. They can look forward to endless dissection of their most minor gaffes; and learn to realise that their serious speeches are judged too dull by meedja execs in thrall to the myth that citizens just can’t be arsed to pay attention to anything that smacks of serious.

So exactly how do we judge the success (or otherwise) of Nick Clegg, who today begins his second year as our leader?

To be honest, I think it’s pretty easy. Nick Clegg as leader is exactly what the vast majority of us – discounting those few who thought he was the Lib Dem Messiah, and those few for whom Nick can do no right – thought he would be: he’s a work in progress.

Nick has immense intellectual strength and curiosity. He’s actually a policy wonk, which many might regard as a handicap for a political leader, who is often expected to remain at arms-length from the detail (a la Blair). I find Nick’s hunger for new ideas one of his most endearing qualities. If either Gordon Brown or David Cameron had even half Nick’s questing drive, political debate in this country would be so much more mature than it is.

But, as so often, there is a flip-side to Nick’s boyish questioning: his habit of ‘thinking out loud’ sometimes results in fuzzy communication, most notably when he appeared to suggest that the “vast bulk” of the party’s £20 billion public spending savings would be ear-marked for tax cuts. Nick’s chief of staff Danny Alexander was hastily despatched to these very pages to try and ventriloquise the party out of Nick’s mis-speaking; but the damage was done, and the confusion has been hard to un-do.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged and | 55 Comments

Nick Clegg writes… my first year as Liberal Democrat leader

Clegg’s first year: Clegg on Clegg | Tall on Clegg | Land on Clegg | Littlewood on Clegg | Clegg on YouTube

A year ago today I was elected as leader of our great party. It has been a challenging and exciting year. I am very proud that in that time we have made all the running on so many of the important issues facing us.

Across the country in my Town Hall meetings, of which I’ve now held more than 30, people regularly raise with me their concerns about housing repossessions, fuel …

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged | 15 Comments

Nick+1 on LDV tomorrow

In 2007, Christmas came early for a 39 year-old MP from Sheffield Hallam, when Nick Clegg was elected leader of the Liberal Democrats on 18th December. To mark his first anniversary as party leader tomorrow, Lib Dem Voice will be publishing an exclusive article by The Man Himself, as well as opinion pieces by a range of Liberal Democrats. Click back here tomorrow to read and enjoy, and to contribute to the debate on LDV’s pages.

Posted in Site news | Leave a comment

“A more coherent liberal position”

Never let it be said that I am not a steel-toothed harpy who likes to tear chunks out of journos and indeed the whole concept of the mainstream meedja. This being the case, praise where it’s due, there is a truly incisive and thoughtful leader in the Times this morning covering Nick Clegg’s “Why I am a liberal” speech.

It’s by no means entirely favourable, and in some ways it invokes pessimism. But I think it’s spot on, whether we like it or not. First, the favourable side of the analysis, and It’s the Policy, Stupid:

Striking a more coherent liberal position has two accompanying virtues. First, it puts the Lib Dems in a good position in the event of a minority Tory administration. Second, it places them advantageously in the event that Labour moves to the left. Charles Kennedy thought that he could sneak into the political centre from the left. Nick Clegg knows that the only viable way to supplant the Labour Party is from the right. Overall, this is a very different party from the one that fought the 2005 general election. Then it was difficult to say what the Liberal Democrats stood for beyond opposition to the Iraq war.

Apart from the fact that I personally couldn’t care less whether we attack Labour from the right, the left or from behind with a prize-winning leek so long as we advocate what we believe to be right (I know, what a fanciful soul I am) this strikes me as spot on. The last lines in particular are not an assessment you’ll often hear in the comment highways and byways of Lib Dem Voice, largely for the simple reason that the discontented tend to be louder than the contented, and the discontented (to paraphrase) seem to be currently of the belief that Clegg has led us away from the coherent position of 2005. But I and, I suspect, many others, have quietly subscribed to the Times leader’s view all along.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 38 Comments

Nick’s triple whammy: a fairer society, a greener economy, a politics of trust

Nick Clegg delivered a heavily trailed major speech to the think-tank Demos today on the subject ‘Why I Am A Liberal’ – you can read it in full on the party website here.

The part that’s making the headlines is Nick’s warning to his fellow politicians not to impose panic measures in the wake of high-profile cases, such as the kidnap of Shannon Mathews or the killing of Baby P.

We know that it was the disaster politics response to the killing of Jamie Bulger that led to a massive upswing in the number of children in prison or prison-like secure accommodation. And we know it isn’t doing any good, it isn’t cutting crime, it’s just turning fragile children into damaged adults. Turning out a generation of career criminals. We need to protect against the worst, but we should not assume it. Crime must not end hope.”

However, the whole speech is worth reading – in particular, for Nick’s distillation of the contrasts between liberal and socialist concepts of progressive politics:

… a difference which has endured for the best part of a century and lives on in the modern Liberal Democrat and Labour parties.

Liberalism believes fairness, fulfilment and freedom can be best secured by giving real power directly to millions of citizens. Socialism believes that society can only be improved through relentless state activism, a belief driven by far greater pessimism about the ability of people to improve their own lives.

A liberal believes in the raucous, unpredictable capacity of people to take decisions about their own lives. A Socialist believes in the ordered, controlled capacity of the state to take the right decisions about other peoples’ lives.

A liberal believes a progressive society is distinguished by aspiration, creativity and non conformity. A Socialist believes a progressive society is characterised by enlightened top-down Government. …

Optimism in people. Dispersing power. These then are the key instincts of liberals.

He’s also clear-sighted, and objectively partisan, in his view of the Conservative party:

the Conservative tradition in British politics has oscillated wildly between a paternalistic view of the state – as sceptical as the Left of the capacity of people to take charge of their own lives – to an aggressive consumerism wedded to an unreformed model of politics at home and a brittle, slightly neurotic, nationalism abroad.

The modern Conservative Party seems to me to be beached between these two traditions – keen to take a softer, paternalistic attitude towards social issues whilst taking an increasingly sink-or-swim attitude towards those hit by the economic downturn and a doctrinaire hatred of the EU.

The great strength of British Conservativism has been its aversion to excessive theorising, and respect for simple pragmatism. But I’m not sure how even the most ingenious pragmatist will make sense of these new contradictions.

In the second half of the speech, Nick sets out his – and the Lib Dems’ – liberal response to the current political climate:

… what we also need to understand is this: the economic crisis rightly dominates the political debate today, but it also obscures deeper challenges which the country was already facing, and which are now further exacerbated by recession:

A social crisis. An ecological crisis. And a political crisis. …

The economic turmoil we face today is a direct consequence of a failure to adhere to simple liberal principles in the way we run our economy. And we continue to face the triple challenge of a society which is unfair, ecologically unsustainable and disfigured by distrust in politics.

These problems all stem from power being in the wrong hands, or in too few hands.
That’s what keeps people poor, it’s what prevents us from protecting the planet, and it’s what feeds the growing disillusionment towards politics.

So the solution must be sharing power, rather than hoarding it. Giving people a say over their own lives. Trusting people to make the right judgements for themselves, their families and their communities.

Finally, Nick set out his election stall:

At the next General Election the Labour Government will no doubt say that they should be re-elected to get us out of this mess even though they’re heavily responsible for it in the first place. The Conservatives will no doubt say it’s time for a change even though they have no intention of delivering real, lasting change.

I believe it will be the opportunity for Britain to do things differently. To create a fairer society. A greener economy. A politics of trust. Because at a time of fear, I believe people want hope.

There are many interesting messages here; I’ll pick out only two.

Posted in News | Also tagged | 24 Comments

PMQs – Nick Clegg, the single mother’s friend

Our usual insightful team of commentators are away from their desks this lunchtime so it falls to me to report PMQs,

Questions from Cameron about recapitalisation allowed the PM to patronise him on economic answers. A slip of the tongue for the PM led to him telling the house he had saved the world.  Chutzpah much?

Alan Simpson, the Labour rebel for Nottingham South (including the ward I represent) pointed out the value of saving the world when you have an opposition that can’t even save face. He went on to ask whether now is the time to introduce a Tobin

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged | 72 Comments

Nick Clegg’s speech at the National Climate Change March, London

Thousands of people, including many Lib Dems, marched in protest yesterday on the National Climate Change March in London.

Nick Clegg addressed the crowd (transcript below) at the rally in Parliament Square, and MPs Susan Kramer and Jo Swinson were also there.

I made a video of some of the day’s highlights, such as:

Susan Kramer – “If we’re going to have any commitment to climate change then surely the last thing we need are more flights” (00:49:00)

Nick Clegg addressing the rally in Parliament Square (01:14:00)

Jo Swinson on a global approach to tackling climate change (05:34:00)

And er, me, signing off. (06:30:00) Because, hashtags or no, we’re all roving reporters now.

Posted in News | Also tagged and | 24 Comments

Nick Clegg: first British politician to promote hashtags?

Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg has emailed party members today to publicise Saturday’s National Climate Change March in London (email reproduced below).

Hashtag fans like me particularly liked the PS: Nick is encouraging participants to use the hashtag #climatemarch on Twitter and Flickr. As far as I know, Nick Clegg is the first British politician to promote the use of hashtags.

Whilst it’s a powerful thing for thousands of people to join together in one place and show their solidarity for a cause, this is a way for individuals to give their own report on events. Tweets bearing the …

Posted in Online politics | Also tagged , , , and | 12 Comments

Nick Clegg on Damian Green’s arrest

Writing in the Daily Telegraph today, Nick Clegg said:

When opposition politicians heard about Damian Green’s arrest, many of us asked ourselves the same question: “When did it become a crime to hold the Government to account?”

We already operate in a system where Parliament is effectively neutered, little more than a rubber stamp for legislation that ministers have already decided…

One of the weapons MPs do still have in their armoury is to play the Government at its own game. By releasing information of our own we can highlight matters of public interest that ministers would rather people didn’t know about.

With parliamentary

Posted in News | Also tagged | 3 Comments

Damian Green’s arrest: Nick Clegg’s reaction

From PoliticsHome report of BBC news:

Mr. Clegg called the arrest of Damian Green “a mayday warning for British democracy.”  He said “We have one of the most unaccountable, secretive forms of government anywhere in the modern world.  Now we have an opposition frontbench spokesman raided by anti-terror police.  It’s the kind of thing you’d expect in a tinpot dictatorship.

Posted in News | Also tagged | 16 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on fairness in the tax system

Clegg’s main question today to Brown was simple and broad: a Labour government had the opportunity in the Pre-Budget Report to make the tax system fairer. The Chancellor mentioned fairness eight times during his speech – why did they blow it?

Brown replied in the usual vein, citing increases in the various hand-outs – child benefit, child tax credit, pensions etc – which Clegg then rightly identified as a “list rather than an answer”. He also directly contradicted Clegg on the latter’s assertion that the VAT cut would help big spenders rather than hard-pressed “families” (I can’t

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged | 1 Comment

Lack of men in childcare denies young children role models – Clegg

Interesting speech yesterday from Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg to the Daycare Trust about the importance of male role models for children:

I remember well when I first arrived at Westminster the strange looks I would get when I would miss a drink in the Commons bar so that I could put the kids to bed.

For men wanting to actually work in the field, the social disapproval, even hostility, that they often feel is a huge deterrent … Of those who have done it, some say the only way they were accepted was by being seen as ‘honorary women’, rather than

Posted in News | Also tagged | 7 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on bank lending and bonuses

UPDATE: Anyone dropping in here from the BBC’s liveblog of PMQs, hello and welcome, but please go here instead. You will immediately notice what the hard-pressed Beeb livebloggers did not – that this post is last week’s PMQs report.

Even more shouty plonkerism than usual at PMQs today if such is possible, perhaps partly because Brown and Cameron were reasonably evenly matched. Clegg was heard with comparative quiet for once – it has occurred to me before that a bad day for Cameron often seems to coincide with a good day for Clegg. Perhaps it’s a function of psychology, that if Cameron hasn’t provided particularly effective opposition, Clegg feels more able to.

He asked how the government intended to force the banks to make good on the things they promised in return for recapitalisation – an end to the bonus culture, and increased lending to small businesses. All MPs, Clegg said, knew that small businesses in their constituencies were “receiving emails from their banks that virtually closed them down overnight”. The Prime Minister, to my great surprise, did not once mention Winter Fuel Payments in his answer. He referred to various existing government schemes for funding small businesses, confirming the now total merging of state and private sector in the collective hive mind of Labour.

Clegg’s second question was a reiteration of the first, but I think put the case more effectively with a reference to Brown’s “strutting” on the world stage of the G20 meeting, showing off his plan – which at home simply wasn’t working. If the Prime Minister would not force banks to lend to small businesses, would he at least set up a new commercial bank to lend businesses money directly – a reference to the “government bank” proposal that received some press this morning. Brown simply reiterated that his plan was working. No real change in the answer, except that Brown referred to the fact that Barclays had elected not to pay board bonuses (something which I gather was whispered to him on the front bench while Clegg was asking his second question) – a disingenuous point since Clegg wasn’t asking about just board bonuses.

This was what I would call a safe PMQs for Clegg. He didn’t tackle the tax issue in the bullish way James Graham suggested, and in fact refrained from tackling it at all. In starting a groove on any other issue of a similar depth to the one he has developed on tax cuts, he is hampered by the two question constraint. At least two questions on the same subject week after week can be slowly forged into a narrative – and the challenge is then to control it.

But when Clegg starts a new pet topic, Brown can get away with essentially providing the same answer to both questions, in a way that he can’t quite get away with providing the same answer to six questions from Cameron. I understand why Clegg sticks closely to one theme for both questions – he’s going for impact rather than scattergun – but even so it takes us a hellishly long time to get anywhere near a good PMQs narrative with two questions a week.

Posted in News and PMQs | 2 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on “big, permanent and fair” tax cuts

Today’s PMQs underlined to me how utterly hollow and rotten the institution really is. It’s not just that it couldn’t be more archaic if the protagonists were daubed with woad. It’s how it makes them behave. The aspect being chiefly reported is a horrifically self-important tussle between Cameron and Brown over a dead baby.

In case you are lucky enough not to know about this yet, Baby P was killed recently in North London after months of abuse during which time he had been the subject of supervision from various health and child protection agencies, all of whom

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged , and | 27 Comments

Nick Clegg on global cooperation and tax policy

The full text of his speech to the Royal Commonwealth Society on Liberal Democrat tax policy and also the party’s approach to global cooperation is now up on his website:

This is a time of crisis for Britain, and for the world. The banking collapse will lead to a global recession; that much is now certain. And its implications will be profound.

The very model of capitalism that America has promulgated for generations is now being questioned. The rise of China, India, Brazil and oil-rich Gulf States will be accelerated by a prolonged American recession. And instability and conflict will be driven

Posted in News | 14 Comments

Nick Clegg vs Daniel Finkelstein on tax

Seconds out, round two. Nick Clegg has a piece over on Comment Central, taking Danny Finkelstein to task over tax policy and laying out the Liberal Democrat approach:

Without growth there’s no earthly way we’ll be able to balance the books over the economic cycle. Far from being irresponsible, as Danny alleges, tax cuts at a time of recession is the responsible thing to do. No wonder august papers such as the FT and the Economist are now coming round to our view, as are many eminent economists.

Of course, not all tax cuts help the wider economy. The Tory inheritance tax

Posted in News | Also tagged | 21 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on Obama’s tax cutting policy

Both opposition leaders were able to make play with Obama’s victory at PMQs today. David Cameron compared his “novice” status to that of Obama, and Nick Clegg asked why the Prime Minister – who had minutes earlier compared his own government’s priorities to Obama’s – did not adopt Obama’s policies on cutting tax for lower and middle income earners.

Clegg has an increasingly clear record as the Cato of British politics on the subject of tax cuts. It has been a regular topic for him at PMQs all year, often associated with fuel poverty or food

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged , and | 15 Comments

Clegg welcomes Obama’s election

The Guardian reports the welcomes from all three main party leaders to the morning’s news that Barack Obama is the President-elect of the USA:

Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, was more open at his delight in a Democrat victory. “British voters may not have been able to vote in this election, but its outcome is vital to our future,” he said. “Climate change, the global economy, and threats to our collective security now demand a radical new approach by Barack Obama, leaving the Bush era firmly behind.”

Posted in LDVUSA | Also tagged | Leave a comment

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on wasteful public spending

This being Prime Minister’s Questions, the burning topic of the day – should Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross be publicly flogged for crimes against Andrew Sachs – was not tackled. But, this being PMQs, there was plenty of other puerile posturing and manipulative outrage on display.

The Tories’ David Cameron returned to the questioning that brought him no joy last week: demanding that Gordon Brown accept that ‘boom and bust’, far from being vanquished, is alive and well in UK plc today. The rest of his questions got bogged down in trying to prove the Prime Minister has abandoned his infamous fiscal rules.

Mr Cameron is right about this, but it’s poor strategy for three reasons: (i) the Tory leader just doesn’t sound convincing when talking about the details of economic policy; (ii) the Prime Minister (rather as Tony Blair did after 9/11) is quite content, at least for the moment, to say extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures; and (iii) because, as The Spectator’s Fraser Nelson argues here, the Tory leader is failing to project any form of Tory narrative that might connect with voters. More than usual, Mr Cameron is adopting slick debating society schtick during these recession reality PMQs. It worked once; it’s not working now.

By contrast, the Lib Dems’ Nick Clegg used his two salvoes to make two big, connected points: that there are billions of government spending that not only can be cut, but should be cut (eg, ID cards and the surveillance database); and that the best and fairest way to stimulate the economy is to cut taxes for low- and middle-income earners. In doing so, Nick gains high praise from Fraser (again):

Finally, the right line from Prime Minister’s Questions – and it’s one that Gordon Brown will fear the most. “What people need now is more money in their pockets. He could deliver big tax cuts for people who desperately need help”. It was from Nick Clegg. You can argue – as I do – that the Liberal Democrats’ proposed tax cut is paltry. But the rhetoric and positioning is precisely right. It’s a binary distinction: Brown trusts the state, and wants to spend his way out of a recession. Clegg is saying he trusts the British public, and wants to stimulate the economy by letting them keep more of their own money. When Brown retorted that the “Liberal Party” would somehow damage the British economy by taking out £20 billion of spending, it sounded irrelevant. Clegg has astutely judged that the Tories are missing an open goal because of internal struggles with the concept of tax cuts. It’s a no-brainer in the current environment – has anyone see Barack Obama’s website recently? Obama’s figures, like Clegg’s, are paltry if you add them up. But the positioning is right. Clegg is showing the Tories how to do it.

Anyway, you can judge for yourselves, below, via YouTube and the Hansard transcript:

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged | 5 Comments

PMQs: Nick tackles Gordon on pensioner fuel poverty

No surprises that the financial crisis again dominated the slanging-match exchanges at Prime Minister’s Questions this week.

Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg stuck to his week-in-week-out brief – asking punchy questions about the ‘bread and butter’ issues affecting the lives of everyday folk – this time focusing on fuel poverty, and the estimates that up to 80% of single pensioners will struggle to heat their homes this winter. Nick even managed to get in a sly dig at both Labour and the Tories over the Mandelson-Osborne Russian donor imbroglio, noting that Gordon Brown “is all at sea, if not in a luxury yacht, like some prominent members of the Opposition.”

David Cameron once again found himself on the defensive when challenging the Prime Minister, with his frustration levels visibly rising as he sees the Prime Minister growing in confidence in inverse proportion to the growth of the British economy.

The Tory leader has a problem at the moment: in times of crisis, you have to sound like you have a firm grip on policy, that you can offer solutions not just identify problems. Everyone knows the economy’s gone tits-up on Labour’s watch. But most of the public recognises that this is a global financial crisis, and that the Tories, just like Labour, failed to see it coming, and when it did happen stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Labour. So politicians are currently being judged on the proposals they put forward now, not the degree of foresight they showed previously (sadly for the Lib Dems and Vince).

Anyway judge for yourselves how Vince did, via the magic of YouTube and Hansard:

Posted in News and PMQs | Also tagged | Leave a comment
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Geoffrey Payne
    I broadly agree with comrade Simon, although the extra problem with raising taxes is that we also have a cost of living crises, so people on low to medium incom...
  • Richard Whelan
    I attended the one on Friday and, like you said Caron, felt that the party really did want to know the views of members. I look forward to seeing what emerges ...
  • David Raw
    Correction : should be "South Africa House in Trafalgar Square"....
  • David Raw
    @ Neil Hickman Thanks for stirring a memory Neil. I was employed at LPO (Party HQ) way back in June 1964, and took part in the massive international campaign...
  • Tom Reeve
    What strikes me about this discussion is what is absent from it. We are debating how to fund services to the last decimal place, and nobody mentions that the we...