£104 to read the Times online – how will the blogosphere react?

News International announced this morning that, from June, we punters will have to cough up £2 a week to read the Times and Sunday Times online – a cool £104 a year.

The sound you hear is bloggers choking on their breakfast cereal.

The move makes a lot of sense for News International.  True, their online readership will plummet.  But, unlike most bloggers, Murdoch’s willy-waving is based on the size of his bank balance, not his number of unique visitors.  Online advertising, for everyone except Google, hasn’t proved to be the magical money-making machine we were promised, and there’s only so much a business can give away.

We might like to read our news online for free, but we’re also the first to complain about poor standards of journalism, the “churnalism” reprinting of press releases and all the rest of it.  If we want more hard news, more investigations, more fact checking, more “proper” journalism, we have to pay for it.

But it presents a real challenge to bloggers.  The vast majority of us don’t get paid for our online efforts, and have neither the time nor the money to be full-time journos.  Look through most blogs and you’ll find a high proportion of the stories come from the online mainstream media, often quoting a paragraph or two and linking to the source.

Wednesday’s Lib Dem Voice, for example, had the Daily View plus two pieces based on stories from the Mirror. Yesterday had even more.

What will more pay sites mean?

Bloggers may find themselves biased towards the free-to-read media.  Even if the bloggers subscribe to read the pay media, the inability to link to content in a way readers can view it will cause issues.

Might it lead to groups of bloggers working more closely together?  That could be a way to collectively subscribe to papers and gain the resources for more original journalism.  Lib Dem Voice is run by a group of volunteers who achieve far more together than we could just running our own personal blogs (though we all have those too).  Between us, we might be able to fund the subscriptions.

The trend towards pay sites will continue.  The companies that run them are businesses which need to make a profit, and free-to-view media websites cost more that they raise in revenue.

The nightmare vision is the blogosphere turning into an extended Have Your Say thread – inward looking, all sound and no light, all opinion and no fact.

But blogging is still in its infancy.  Even the most popular blogs have a tiny readership compared to the mainstream media.  If  we can use this as an opportunity to up our game, we might look back on it as a positive development; one of the kicks we need if the blogosphere is to reach its true potential.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

11 Comments

  • This is superb news. The more obstacles Darth Murdoch puts up in front of people reading his poisonous literature the better.

  • £104 quid? Ha. Don’t be silly. I’ll only bother paying for it when all the others start charging.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Most Read

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Watson 18th Jan - 12:28am
    @Eddie Sammon "The Commons, and definitely not the Lords, won’t vote for hard brexit." I'm not so sure. A parliamentary vote is likely to be...
  • User Avatarmatt 18th Jan - 12:07am
    @Sesenco "Ask yourself why people with higher educational qualifications overwhelmingly voted Remain. Was it because they were all stupid?" What a nasty condescending attitude.. What...
  • User AvatarValko Yotov 18th Jan - 12:01am
    People calm down. There is a good news - It is a long game. Option 1 - May fails to do any negotiation and we...
  • User AvatarEddie Sammon 17th Jan - 11:45pm
    Thanks Lorenzo. I may do soon-ish. :)
  • User AvatarDJ 17th Jan - 11:32pm
    My initial thoughts are that May is saying, as have others in the months following, that because the Remain campaign told voters that Leave would...
  • User AvatarPeter Watson 17th Jan - 11:25pm
    "he joked that many of us in the audience probably did things that might not be missed by the public if we went on strike"...