Argyll and Bute Council backs down on school dinners blog ban

The leader of Argyll and Bute Council has reversed the decision to ban a 9 year old schoolgirl from taking photographs of her school dinners and blogging about them. Roddy McCuish did so live on Radio 4’s The World at One, bringing to an end a morning of social media frenzy which had seen the subject have 3 of highest trending topics on Twitter in the UK.

In my earlier post, I covered the background and Argyll and Bute’s initial statement on the matter. It seemed strange for the Council to say it was taking action against “unwarranted attacks” on their school meals service when the average mark Martha had given her meals was 7.59 out of 10.

It’s good to see that common sense has prevailed in this case. It’s the right decision. It is worth observing, however, that it appears to be an interesting example of the SNP chain of command in action. While Liberal Democrat councillors would never dream of taking orders from parliamentarians or ministers, it’s common for SNP councillors to be dictated to from above.  Liberal Democrat councillors who had worked in coalition with them told me that their deference to their MSPs could be at best irritating. We know that Mike Russell, the local SNP MSP and Cabinet Secretary for Education called the decision “daft” last night and eventually his wish prevailed.

The Communications Department at Argyll and Bute Council has had a troubled few months. Edinburgh Eye recounts how the communications officer had told a social media gathering how she created social media accounts in false names to follow critics of the Council. In April, two other officers were suspended, and  subsequently resigned after messages joking about other council officials were intercepted on the Council’s messaging system. With that sort of atmosphere in the Department, it’s hardly surprising that they have not produced their best work.

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie  earlier slammed Argyll and Bute’s actions as a “dog’s dinner” and said he was delighted

by Martha’s enterprising approach to highlighting an age-old problem, and encourage the council to work with her to create healthy and tasty school dinners.

By reviewing good dinners as well as bad Martha was being fair, it’s a shame that the Council haven’t followed her example.

Martha clearly has a bright future ahead of her. We should be seeking to reward her courage, not ban it.

After the ban was reversed, he suggested Martha could help train council officials across Scotland in blogging and social media skills.

Meanwhile, Martha herself continues to rake in funds for the charity Mary’s Meals. Over 2000 children in Africa will now benefit from meals for a school year because of this furore. Who says the internet is a waste of time?

* Caron Lindsay is Co-Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Bookmark the web address for this page or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/28979 for Twitter and emails.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Although a social media generated storm, this is really a good news story both for the principle of transparency and free speech and for the fact donations are pouring in on the website for a very worthwhile cause (including from lots of people outside the UK).

    Perhaps the council should have issued this statement: “We realised that a ridiculous over-reaction was the way to get everyone interested in this excellent blog and raising money for such a good cause. We are grateful for the many messages of abuse about our ban and the vigilance of social media leading to Martha’s target of raising £7,000 pounds has been smashed. Thanks to our ban, thousands more children in the third world will have food to eat and be able to attend school.”

  • Nigel Ashton 15th Jun '12 - 4:26pm

    Somehow I don’t think that Argyll & Bute Council’s communications staff have heard of the Streisand effect.

  • My 9 year old daughter was very impressed with the blog (although as a fussy eater she didn’t see anything she would like to eat!), and decided to donate £2 to Martha’s chosen charity, which looks at though it might have raised £50k by the end of the evening. Full marks to Martha, and her dad.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMark Argent 22nd Dec - 2:51am
    If we do find ourselves in the position of being the king-makers, might the argument not be partly pragmatism (deciding which party would offer a...
  • User Avatarstuart moran 22nd Dec - 2:04am
    Sarah Noble So there is one based on your (not unbiased) view. Looking at the odds, the best I can see are 5/1 on for...
  • User Avatarmalc 22nd Dec - 1:57am
    Sesenco It really isn't that complicated. I was in Withington when the LibDems won the seat, it has a large student population and nearly all...
  • User AvatarRichard Dean 22nd Dec - 1:36am
    Re-train to control the machines!
  • User AvatarSarah Noble 22nd Dec - 1:02am
    This is the thing: people are just looking at David's tiny majority, and the fact it's Bradford, and assuming we've lost already. We still hold...
  • User AvatarChris Manners 22nd Dec - 12:44am
    That was a by-election. A win over Labour by only 365 votes in Bradford East last time looks too small.