Brian Paddick writes… I’m not a celebrity: should I have got me in there?

If there is a consistent theme throughout my life, it is following ‘high risk strategies’. Joining an overtly homophobic police service knowing I was gay, suggesting the police took a more liberal stance on illegal drugs, challenging Sir Ian Blair over the Stockwell shooting, and giving evidence for the family in the De Menezes inquest, were not the easiest or safest routes to take.

Having been approached by both the Tories and the Liberal Democrats to be their candidate for the 2008 Mayor of London election, following my conscience, my passion and my deeply held beliefs, was also not the easiest or the safest route to take. Whatever the pathologists might think, we took over 875,000 first and second preference votes, when the winner secured just over 1.2m.

So what came over me when I decided to participate in the ITV programme I’m a Celebrity … Get me Out of Here? Amongst other things, 15p from every telephone call made to the programme – and there were millions of calls – goes to charity. We do not know the final figures yet but Lambeth Crime Prevention Trust will be benefitting, hopefully substantially, from my participation in the programme. Commentators have speculated that my participation even boosted the viewing figures, possibly amongst potential Lib Dem voters.

Yes, there are risks associated with participation. You are totally isolated from the outside world and your loved-ones, given insufficient food (I lost 9 kg/1½ stone in 17 days) and you do not get enough sleep. You get far more emotional than you might otherwise be, and you have to spend 24/7 with some very irritating people. You participate in ‘trials’, some of which can be humiliating (mine, thankfully, were not).

It is also a programme that is on television for an hour and a half, every day for three weeks, on prime-time television, attracting over seven million viewers every day. Naively, perhaps, I felt this was an opportunity to show a much wider public that Liberal Democrat politicians are actually human, just how hard-working us Liberal Democrats are, how much we care about other people and that we are far from the negative stereotype our critics portray us as. Whether I was successful or not is for others to judge, but I believe I left with my dignity intact. The feedback I have had personally, via Facebook and elsewhere, appears to support that view (I apparently did the gay cause no harm either).

Can I be taken seriously anymore after my ‘antics’? Judging from my appearances on BBC Radio 4′s The Today Programme, the BBC News channel, BBC London radio and television, and BBC Radio Five Live since my return from ‘the jungle’, commenting on crime and policing issues, the answer would appear to be “yes”.

I have no intention of appearing on anything similar in the future and would never have considered appearing on any reality TV show that did not have a charitable element. My fiercest critics, alas, are probably those who know little about the programme, who would never watch such a thing, and so never did. (Not that that makes them bad people – neither did I until I was on it!) As my old boss, then Sir John, now Lord Stephens, said to me “Brian, I like a man who takes risks … provided they come off.” Have they?

* Brian Paddick was Liberal Democrat candidate for the London mayoralty in 2008.

Share:
This entry was posted in Op-eds and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink or use the short url http://ldv.org.uk/9917 for twitter and emails. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Trackbacks are closed, but you can post a comment.

19 Comments

  • Posted 7th January 2009 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    My sister liked Paddick, if that counts on anything! She’s the sort of person who enjoys reality TV.

    Look at it this way. All publicity is good publicity.

  • carrion
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Would you say that of the whole Nick Clegg 30 lovers thing?

  • Elizabeth
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Brian, a good defence and congratulations. No comments indeed!

    That probably shows you have taken another risk in writing, so I will get in and make a comment before those young men who always turn our blog threads into a personal argument, rather than a debate find their way here.

    I’m afraid to say that my television ration does not allow one-and-a-half hours per day. Neither did I know it was so, and am quite amazed.

    It is good for our party that we have some people who are not afraid to be on the edge of conventional.

    One thing that is pleasing me about the young Mr Clegg whom I didn’t help to get elected, is that he seems not afraid to be candid and after a few unfortunate episodes I think he will also show those strong leadership qualities that you obviously have.
    Elizabeth

  • Posted 7th January 2009 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Hi Brian, I don’t think there’s any harm in the occasional bit of light relief to balance all the serious stuff.

    I wouldn’t worry about the critics too much.

  • Posted 7th January 2009 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    No complaints from me, Brian. There is a world of difference between doing the odd reality TV show and using the platform it provides you to promote the party, and serially appearing on every single reality/celebrity TV show that will have you and not using that platform to promote anything other than yourself (and thus inflate your Hello magazine appearance fees).

    Not thinking of anyone in particular, of course.

  • Brian
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    I guess you can please some of the people some of the time…

  • LJH
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    My partner and I were watching it and getting misty-eyed over the fact that three older, openly LGBT people – Brian, Martina Navratilova and George Takei – could all appear on such a programme and get a positive reaction from the audience and fellow cast members. Sometimes it astonishes and delights me how much things have changed, even in the space of the last decade. In the midst of so much to be gloomy about, there really are some causes for hope, and in very unexpected places.

  • Posted 7th January 2009 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    Me and my family have been avid viewers of IACGMOOH since it started. You came over as a decent individual and we were struck with your passion for Blue and that fellow’s torso! You certainly avoided doing a Galloway.

    But then again, even Kilroy came over as a reasonably decent human being this year.

    The one dodgy character seemed to be David Van Day.

  • Gaycop
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    ‘An Overtly Homophobic Police Service’

    All I will say Brian is that I am extreemy disapointed in you. I have been in the Met for 9yrs now as an openly gay man and have never exp any kind of homophobic abuse – well none that I have not dealt with, and those instances were minimal and quickly brought to justice. The Police service as an institution is teriffied of anybody that is not hetrosexual and white… But that is wrong! Even as a gay copper myself, if I ever did anything wrong then I would expect to be treated the same as any other police officer. The sad fact is, the police service would run a mile.. unless of course I did something that outragous that a disaplinary action was unavoidable.

    In summary, I support you, but please do not ‘big up’ your cause because you are gay or because you want people to feel you have been hard done by.. because in my opinion you have not. In fact I beleive you have done extreemly well within the police service, and I have no doubt that, that partially has too do with your sexuality.

    The Police Service, including the MPS has a lot to learn, but the lessons to be learnt are not to be affraid of anyone that is not white and straight…

  • Hywel
    Posted 7th January 2009 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Brian joined the met about 20 years before you though. The thread below suggests Brian says that things have changed significantly.

  • David Morton
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 5:32 am | Permalink

    I apologise for being unoriginal but it was one show at a time when you held no party position. The show is well established, popular and mainstream. There was a charity element. What was ever the problem /

    I also think there is an element of “New Politics” about this. One of the problems of the mayoral campaign was that you were up against “first name only” brands like Boris and Ken. If you want another go ( and i don’t know if you do) then I’d have thought I’m a Celebrity would have been an excellent move.

    Tell Critics where to shove it.

  • Brian
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 6:47 am | Permalink

    Gaycop I am pleased the pioneering work that your gay predecessors has paid off for you. The police service I joined in 1976 was overtly homophobic. Yes, things have improved but the Gay Police Association recorded its highest ever number of homophobic incidents within the police service in 2006. I am not saying the police service is openly homophobic now.

    On whether I was hard done by or not, please read the linked article regarding Sir Ian Blair.

    I have successfully sued a newspaper who claimed I had been promoted just because I was gay. Let’s not go down that route.

  • Anonymous
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Good piece Brian, glad that now you are a politician you are continuing to be yourself.

    I sincerely hope that the party finds a high profile role for you that makes the most of your potential.

  • Sasha
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Brian – I thought you did really well in the jungle, we all thought you should have won. The point is, your a good man and you worked in the force protecting your community & people around you and some homophobic people have no respect whatsoever, even colleagues. Well done!

    P.S me and my family noticed how much weight you lost! You looked so thin, but you did well in the jungle!

  • John T
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    “some of which can be humiliating (mine, thankfully, were not).”

    “I left with my dignity intact.”

    Brian, you spent the night in bed with 30 rats in a cage with you… that is humiliating and shows no dignity.

    “I apparently did the gay cause no harm either”

    The gay cause? Brian what is this ‘gay cause’. There is no ‘gay cause’ it is in your head and even if there was you did not do anything to help it by sleeping with 30 rats in a jungle in Australia with a bunch of Z-List celebrities.

    Gay cause? My eye… and think I was quite glad when you were announced the pic for the May elections last year :O

  • Brian
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    John T you are entitled to your opinion (thankfully not one shared by the majority). A scenario can be humiliating if you behave in a ridiculous manner in response to the scenario and it can result in you having no dignity if you react in an undignified way. I do not believe, set in context, my behaviour in response to this challenge was either humiliating or lacking in dignity.

    ‘Gay cause’ is my shorthand for ‘helping to demolish negative stereotypes of gay people’. Negative stereotypes of gay people are not ‘in my head’ but in the minds of many bigoted and small-minded people who rush to judgement on the basis of little or no evidence and/or blind prejudice.

    I have lost count of the number of messages of support I have received from gay (and straight people) who have said they consider my ‘performance’ in the jungle to have conveyed a very positive image of gay people. Most people would also not consider Martina Navratalova and George Takei to be Z-list celebrities.

    On a technical point, I did not ‘sleep with 30 rats’. When one tried to get into my sleeping bag I told it in no uncertain terms “I hardly know you and already you want to sleep with me – get out!”

  • Anonymous
    Posted 8th January 2009 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    How many rats were there? “No more than 30″?

  • KL
    Posted 9th January 2009 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Brian, I must admit that when I saw that you were going in to the jungle I did cringe a little. It would have been so easy for the ITV producers to either edit you out altogether, or make you look foolish. But they didn’t, and I’d say that you came out of it with pretty much your reputation intact. It did help that this was probably the best set of contestants the series has had and was a generally interesting couple of weeks.

  • Posted 3rd March 2010 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    Am trying to contact Brian Paddick. We hold monthly debates at the Phoenix Tavern, Faversham, Kent ME13 7BH and I am looking for someone to argue that the drugs problem is best solved by legalisation.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but will not publish personally abusive comments. Our comments policy is published here, please respect it and all readers of the site.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Do you agree to the T&Cs?